Instant Runoff VotingThe Literacy Test of the 21st Century
Demand one person, one vote, on paper, publicly audited, no exceptions
The IRV proponents' next step is to quickly rope in 10 Counties. The best way to do this is without public discussion.
Efforts to block the vote just keep coming:
1st, only certain people could vote.
then, some people only had 3/5 of a vote
next, came poll taxes,
then, came literacy tests,
We would never tolerate these barriers to our franchise today.
Today's barriers to voting are more sophisticated and promoted sometimes by people we trust and respect:
What is new in Blocking the Vote?
How about Instant Runoff Voting, a new, sophisticated voting method -marketed as "Its as easy as 1-2-3". (some voters took this promo too seriously and put numbers on their ballots instead of shading in the circles).
Lucky you, you get to mark 3 choices for one contest in a local election!
Many people will be embarrassed to say - but I don't get it, how is my vote counted?
What if I rank the only candidate I care about - 3 times? (hint - your 2nd and 3rd choices won't count)
What if I don't have a 2nd and 3rd choice, will my vote count as much as other peoples? (No!)
What if I don't read the same papers and hear the same radio that "educates" the public about IRV? (You won't be on equal footing.)
Even SOME intelligent, well educated people in Cary, North Carolina found it confusing. Cary Demographics are unusual, this is a predominently white, educated and upper income community. The City Council website boasts that "This year, 94.3% of the respondents had internet access" But still IRV confused some folks:
IRV was "tested" in Hendersonville, NC using touchscreens (anyone say "incentivizing touch-screens?). One voter complained about the confusing ballot, and was bashed by the officials. On October 19, 2007 He told the "Blue Ridge Now" reporter:Cary election previews vote in Hendersonville By Jordan Schrader, October 15, 2007...When the count ended, Frantz led by a couple of dozen votes, with an official total due Tuesday. Frantz said he wouldn't support another instant-runoff.Hundreds of people he met left the polls not understanding the system, he said. He prefers an actual runoff with a clear choice of two candidates."Even after all this is said and done, none of us got a clear majority," Frantz said.
"I call it instant confusion"....He said the elections worker he spoke with didn't seem pleased when he questioned the system. "She acted almost like she was offended, like 'you idiot, can't you figure it out?'" he said.
IRV and its effect on election integrity and transparency
Dr. Rebecca Mercuri Internationally respected computer scientist and e-voting expert warns - ""IRV and other proportional balloting methods have been proven to incentivize the introduction of electronic ballot tabulation in places where none previously was needed or has existed, and they further complicate what has become an increasingly closed process for the determination of election results.
Since these methods lend themselves to potential "gaming" of the ballot set that may not be independently detectable or auditable, these run-off styles must be prohibited. The present climate of distrust regarding election integrity will only be further undermined by skepticism invoked by increased complexity of alternative balloting methods, especially if the vendors are allowed to continue to obfuscate their vote tabulation products."
More on What They Don't Tell You about IRV:
Have a conversation with one of your friends and try to explain to each other how the ballots are counted.
See the instructions here (pdf file)
Learn more at Instant Runoff Voting US
Demand one person, one vote, on paper, publicly audited, no exceptions