Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (6 comments)

The Voting Literacy Test of the 21st Century

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (3 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

Instant Runoff VotingThe Literacy Test of the 21st Century

Demand one person, one vote, on paper, publicly audited, no exceptions

North Carolina adopted a pilot program for instant runoff voting for up to 10 cities in 2007 and up to 10 counties for 2008. "The State Board of Elections shall closely monitor the pilot program established in this section and report its findings and recommendations to the 2007 General Assembly." The city of Cary used IRV for municipal elections in October 2007 and the city of Hendersonville will use IRV for municipal elections in November 2007.
The IRV proponents' next step is to quickly rope in 10 Counties.  The best way to do this is without public discussion.
Instant Runoff Voting is not Instant, and not as easy as 1-2-3
San Francisco re-named it "Ranked Choice Voting" because it isn't "instant"
It opens us up to a gaming of the ballot, and makes election transparency as clear as mud.
We have done a lot to clean up elections in North Carolina.
Some special interests kept us from ditching all the touch screens, so we are still very vulnerable in some parts of the state.

Efforts to block the vote just keep coming:

1st, only certain people could vote.

then, some people only had 3/5 of a vote

next, came poll taxes,

then, came literacy tests,

We would never tolerate these barriers to our franchise today.

Today's barriers to voting are more sophisticated and promoted sometimes by people we trust and respect: 

Paperless Electronic Voting. 
Votes are lost, switched, added or subtracted by voting machines with no paper record to check the electronic count against. We corrected that by passing the Public Confidence in Elections Act in August, 2005.
Voter registration databases.
When registering to vote, people have to provide a social security number, and a drivers license number (if they have one) etc on it. 
Then the State Board of Elections has to match this information with the DMV and the Social Security databases.  20% of social security numbers don't match, and they don't give a reason why.  The last 4 digits are what are used to run the match, and any woman who has had a name change, or anyone with a mis spelling etc can be disenfranchised.  If you didn't match,  then "No Match, No Vote"! They aren't registered. We corrected North Carolina's "No Match No Vote" rule  in August, 2007
Once approved by the DOJ (we are a Jim Crowe state and have to get clearance) then if you don't match, you will just have to provide the typical NC required id the first time you vote.  You will be registered!

What is new in Blocking the Vote?

How about Instant Runoff Voting, a new, sophisticated voting method -marketed as "Its as easy as 1-2-3". (some voters took this promo too seriously and put numbers on their ballots instead of shading in the circles).

Lucky you, you get to mark 3 choices for one contest in a local election!

Many people will be embarrassed to say - but I don't get it, how is my vote counted?

What if I rank the only candidate I care about  - 3 times? (hint - your 2nd and 3rd choices won't count)

What if I don't have a 2nd and 3rd choice, will my vote count as much as other peoples? (No!)

What if I don't read the same papers and hear the same radio that "educates" the public about IRV?  (You won't be on equal footing.)

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://votingnews.blogspot.com

Editor of the Voting News. The Voting News is a free national newsletter about election integrity issues, voting machines, election fraud, voter access and legislation in United States and international news.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

IRV without legislation giving 3rd parties equal rights is by Rob Kall on Monday, Oct 22, 2007 at 8:30:54 AM
if you support hand counted paper ballots, read this by Joyce McCloy on Monday, Oct 22, 2007 at 6:10:17 PM
range voting and approval voting by Warren D Smith on Monday, Oct 22, 2007 at 9:40:12 AM
IRV by Terry Bouricius on Monday, Oct 22, 2007 at 11:04:07 AM
valid ballots claim what San Francisco's elections dept by Joyce McCloy on Monday, Oct 22, 2007 at 3:18:11 PM
The IRV myth machine by CLAY SHENTRUP on Monday, Oct 22, 2007 at 2:03:41 PM