OpEdNews Op Eds

Smashing secret vote counting in San Francisco, giving away the vote in New Hampshire

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It


Become a Fan
  (8 fans)
- Advertisement -

Click to view youtube

San Fransiscans are taking back their democracy.

What's happening in New Hampshire? We like to think of ourselves as Ground Zero for "grassroots democracy".

Or are we?

Here in New Hampshire, we pride ourselves on our grassroots democracy. We grill the presidential candidates. We live free or die. But there's something missing in this picture. A real grassroots democracy depends on a free and open vote, controlled by the citizens whose interests are supposed to be represented by those elected in a free, grassroots, democracy.

But inexplicably, 81% of New Hampshire voter s do not enjoy a free and open democracy. They have given away their vote to a private corporation, a private entity with a history of partisan special interests and whose management team has included a convicted embezzler (formerly aligned with a convicted Watergate burglar mastermind), and a convicted cocaine trafficker.

Yes, 81% of NH voters have given away their vote to a private corporation whose New England representative is located in Methuen, MA. 81% of New Hampshire voters have blindly handed off their civil rights to a company about which we know nothing and over which New Hampshire citizens and officials have no oversight whatsoever.

These New Hampshire voters have allowed LHS Associates, New England's sole representative for Diebold Election Systems, to decide how 81% of NH ballots will be counted, using trade secret software algorithms that even NH's Secretary of State is not allowed to see!

- Advertisement -

Who are these anonymous programmers in Methuen, MA, controlling 81% of NH's votes, counting them in secret? WE DON'T KNOW WHO THEY ARE. What security procedures does this company employ to secure the purity of NH's vote count? WE DON'T KNOW. Have there been any background checks on these people controlling the NH vote count? WE DON'T KNOW. And who are the financial backers of this company that counts 81% of NH's votes in secret? WE DON'T KNOW.

LHS Associates, claiming they owed nothing to NH citizens, declined to reveal information about their business and business practices requested by the NH Fair Elections Committee in March 2006.

We don't know a whole lot about the company that controls so many of our votes, but we do know a lot about US Constitution and its framers, who built and designed our form of government with a wary eye to those with power and control, and who institutionalized a system of distrust and checks and balances, based in most part on openness and observability to enable complete citizen oversight over all governmental processes.

When our governmental functions are shrouded in secrecy our institutionalized distrust and checks and balances falter. When our vote - the sole instrument of citizen oversight and empowerment, short of revolution - is held hostage inside a black box owned by special interests, those checks and balances are irretrievably damaged.

And we are left to consider - blindly - what might be going on inside the black box.

- Advertisement -

So let's consider what we do know about the private interests controlling the vast majority of NH's votes. There is one thing we do know about LHS Associates: we know that they have two lines of business.

Business #1, Programming Elections: With their first line of business, LHS Associates alone has access to and control over the secret vote
counting software
that counts 81% of NH's votes.

Business #2, Collecting Census Data: With their second line of business, LHS Associates performs what is known as "data mining". They collect census data, information about who lives where, what are their incomes, their professions, their habits, their properties, their family histories.

Next Page  1  |  2


Nancy is best known as a national leader in the voting rights movement for her seminal work exposing the dangers and fallacies in various election reform efforts past, present and future.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

NH recounts no check and balance for its privatized corporate-controlled elections

Summary of the Stimulus bill - Don't look half bad to me

NH Secretary of State: "Citizen Election Observers Threaten Election Integrity"

The Myth of Verified Voting: How GOP strategists & J. Abramoff transformed America's elections & the reform movement

2009 Holt Bill. E-Voting: Making a bad system worse

Time to review NH Ballot Law Commission approval of Diebold optical scanners


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

"This is our democracy. It's time to get ... by Tom Murphy on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 1:21:30 PM
Thank you for your comments. You are looking for p... by Nancy Tobi on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 1:37:26 PM
As I stated in the first post, "[W]hat tangib... by Tom Murphy on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 2:33:21 PM
That's the only way you MIGHT find out what pr... by Nancy Tobi on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 5:49:19 PM
Casting the Freedom of Information Act "net&q... by Tom Murphy on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 9:32:51 PM
2006 we had a few reported incidents. This is an i... by Nancy Tobi on Friday, Nov 2, 2007 at 9:25:09 AM