Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
November 1, 2007 at 10:52:28

View Ratings | Rate It

Smashing secret vote counting in San Francisco, giving away the vote in New Hampshire

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Nancy Tobi (about the author)     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Nancy Tobi - Writer

Click to view youtube

San Fransiscans are taking back their democracy.

What's happening in New Hampshire? We like to think of ourselves as Ground Zero for "grassroots democracy".

Or are we?

Here in New Hampshire, we pride ourselves on our grassroots democracy. We grill the presidential candidates. We live free or die. But there's something missing in this picture. A real grassroots democracy depends on a free and open vote, controlled by the citizens whose interests are supposed to be represented by those elected in a free, grassroots, democracy.

But inexplicably, 81% of New Hampshire voters do not enjoy a free and open democracy. They have given away their vote to a private corporation, a private entity with a history of partisan special interests and whose management team has included a convicted embezzler (formerly aligned with a convicted Watergate burglar mastermind), and a convicted cocaine trafficker.

Yes, 81% of NH voters have given away their vote to a private corporation whose New England representative is located in Methuen, MA. 81% of New Hampshire voters have blindly handed off their civil rights to a company about which we know nothing and over which New Hampshire citizens and officials have no oversight whatsoever.

These New Hampshire voters have allowed LHS Associates, New England's sole representative for Diebold Election Systems, to decide how 81% of NH ballots will be counted, using trade secret software algorithms that even NH's Secretary of State is not allowed to see!

Who are these anonymous programmers in Methuen, MA, controlling 81% of NH's votes, counting them in secret? WE DON'T KNOW WHO THEY ARE. What security procedures does this company employ to secure the purity of NH's vote count? WE DON'T KNOW. Have there been any background checks on these people controlling the NH vote count? WE DON'T KNOW. And who are the financial backers of this company that counts 81% of NH's votes in secret? WE DON'T KNOW.

LHS Associates, claiming they owed nothing to NH citizens, declined to reveal information about their business and business practices requested by the NH Fair Elections Committee in March 2006.

We don't know a whole lot about the company that controls so many of our votes, but we do know a lot about US Constitution and its framers, who built and designed our form of government with a wary eye to those with power and control, and who institutionalized a system of distrust and checks and balances, based in most part on openness and observability to enable complete citizen oversight over all governmental processes.

When our governmental functions are shrouded in secrecy our institutionalized distrust and checks and balances falter. When our vote - the sole instrument of citizen oversight and empowerment, short of revolution - is held hostage inside a black box owned by special interests, those checks and balances are irretrievably damaged.

And we are left to consider - blindly - what might be going on inside the black box.

So let's consider what we do know about the private interests controlling the vast majority of NH's votes. There is one thing we do know about LHS Associates: we know that they have two lines of business.

Business #1, Programming Elections: With their first line of business, LHS Associates alone has access to and control over the secret vote
counting software
that counts 81% of NH's votes.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

www.democracyfornewhampshire.com

Nancy Tobi is co-founder, former Chair, and website editor for Democracy for New Hampshire (DFNH). She is also a founder and Chair of the NH Fair Elections Committee. Nancy is the author of numerous articles on election integrity, including "The (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Census Corporations E"
State Statistical Trends: Findings of the 2000 Census I

$50.00

Number of pages: 100
Publisher: Morgan Quitno Corporation

State Statistical Trends: Findings of the 2000 Census II

$50.00

Number of pages: 100
Publisher: Morgan Quitno Corporation

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Yet another filter and another level for human error by Tom Murphy on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 1:21:30 PM
Proof of our approved defective machines by Nancy Tobi on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 1:37:26 PM
Has NH recorded problems with the units? by Tom Murphy on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 2:33:21 PM
File FOIAs with every town and city by Nancy Tobi on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 5:49:19 PM
Casting a net across and empty sea by Tom Murphy on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 9:32:51 PM
There has been evidence of problems by Nancy Tobi on Friday, Nov 2, 2007 at 9:25:09 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum