Come and see the blood in the streets. Come and see the blood in the streets. Come and see the blood in the streets. Pablo Neruda, ‘Selected Poems’; “I’m Explaining a Few Things”
We’ve seen this before.
An Iraqi city is surrounded by troops and armored vehicles; the artillery is wheeled into place, the roads are blocked, a giant wall of sand is piled up around the perimeter, and everything goes silent before the final onslaught.
We’ve seen it in Falluja, al Qaim, Husbaya and Tel Afar; the same persistent refrain over and over again; Rumsfeld’s lone mantra; “surround, isolate and destroy”.
This time it’s Ramadi, next time somewhere else; what difference does it make? Iraq is being decimated city by city, town by town; ravaged by invaders who see an opportunity to fatten their wallets or enhance their reputations. They’ll level everything before they’re done.
Ramadi is just another dot on the map; another set of mud-buildings in a vast ocean of oil; another convenient testing-ground for the War Department’s next generation of high-tech weaponry. To hell with the people; their lives mean nothing.
The strategy for Ramadi is the same as everywhere else; “search and destroy”; identify all areas of resistance and crush them with an iron fist. We don’t do diplomacy, we don’t do negotiations, we don’t do “body counts”.
No one defies the new boss.
Ramadi is a teeming city of 400,000 people. Now it is under siege by Rumsfeld’s legions. The water lines have been blown up, medical supplies have been blocked, electricity has been cut off, and tens of thousands of people are fleeing into the countryside without shelter or food.
This is what is taking place in Ramadi right now. It’s not a video game; its real, and its being executed by the United States under the cover of “liberation” or some other such nonsense. According to Times correspondent Megan Stack:
"The image pieced together from interviews with tribal leaders and fleeing families in recent weeks is one of a desperate population of 400,000 people trapped in the crossfire between insurgents and U.S. forces…U.S. and Iraqi forces had cordoned off the city…Air-strikes on several residential areas picked up, and troops took to the streets with loudspeakers to warn civilians of a fierce impending attack.” “Air strikes on residential areas”?
Not our areas, their areas. Areas where “hajis” and rag-heads live. Ramadi is just another “terrorist sanctuary” to be “democratized” with laser-guided weapons and firebombs. Who cares that thousands of lives will be lost in another barbarous assault on a civilian population? Who cares that property and infrastructure will be reduced to rubble?
The “free press” will paper it over. They always do.
1500 fresh troops have been deployed to Ramadi for the offensive. Residents are afraid of a Falluja-style battle where vast swathes of the city will be left in ruins and thousands of people killed or injured.
The city has been cut off from all sides and American patrols have announced on loudspeakers that civilians should evacuate immediately. Independent journalists are reporting that “fierce fighting” has already broken out between occupation forces and resistance fighters. Air strikes and helicopter raids have intensified. American soldiers are forcing their way into homes in residential areas and snipers have taken positions on the city’s roof tops. On Saturday, June 10, accounts from inside the city confirmed that:
“A full-scale American attack on Ramadi has commenced and fierce fighting is taking place in most of the districts…American fighter planes are now taking part in the offensive.” “Silence” from the American media. Silence from the congress. Silence from the United Nations.
Another colossal war crime is taking shape and the world averts its eyes once again.
Thousands of the city’s residents have refused to leave because they either have no money, no means of transportation, or no place to go. They’ll probably be caught in the crossfire just as others were in Falluja.
It’s a good day for Rumsfeld; another chance to spread misery across the pock-marked landscape; another opportunity to experiment with the Pentagon’s latest lethal gadgetry, another occasion to reduce a major Iraqi city to Dresden-type wreckage.
He is completely free to work his magic. No one will notice anyway.
Mike is a freelance writer living in Washington state.
To steal and paraphrase part of an important speech written and given by John Kerry in 1971:
"We saw first hand how money from American taxes was used for a corrupt dictatorial regime and war profiteers (corrupt multi-nationals), i.e. Halliburton and Bectel.
We rationalized destroying villages in order to save them. We saw America lose her sense of morality, as she accepted very cooly, Al Agrib (misp?) and refused to give up the image of American soldiers who hand out chocolate bars and chewing gum.
We learned the meaning of free fire zones, shooting anything that moves, and we watched while America placed a cheapness on the lives of Moslem Arabs.
Now we are told that the men who fought there must watch quietly while American lives are lost so that we can exercise the incredible arrogance of Iraqizing the Iraqis.
Each day to facilitate the process by which the United States washes her hands of Iraq, someone has to give up his life so that the United States doesn't have to admit,
something that the entire world already knows,
so that we don't have to say that we have made a mistake.
Someone has to die so that President Bush will be able to say, and these are his words, "mission accomplished".
We are asking Americans to think about that because how do you ask a man to be the last man to die in Iraq?
How do you ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake and war based on lies and deceit?
by
LYNNE KRINGLER (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 59 comments)
on Thursday, June 15, 2006 at 2:21:27 AM
I heard Sean Hannity agreeing with one contributor on his show that the marines who fought in Iwo Jima and Fallujah, should be supported. Now, I only saw the film, hence my precise knowledge may be a little suspect and prone to childhood admiration of the fight between Forrest Tucker and John Wayne…. (Tucker does not inform on Wayne who struck him for abandoning his post).
However, was Iwo Jima not a fair fight, which the marines could have lost? They faced a well-matched enemy, who had attacked them without warning and were determined, resourceful, ruthless and well armed? The Japanese were deeply dug in and presented a formidable challenge. This was an honourable battle, of which the US could be justifiably proud… the marines lost thousands of men. …and John Wayne!
Fallujah was different. This was an assault on a city, carried out by a space age air force, using Koran-sensitive satellite cameras, to pinpoint pockets of resistance. Any movement could then be countered by guided missiles, each of which had the explosive power of the entire Iwo Jima campaign.
Let's stop Ramadi before it occurs.
by
Hamish (45 articles, 0 quicklinks, 68 diaries, 210 comments)
on Thursday, June 15, 2006 at 4:04:29 AM
2 comments
How would you rate this?
You must be logged in (if signed up) to do ratings.
It's free to signup! And easy. And takes just a minute or two....
Must Read (
Well Said (
News (
Touching (
Funny (
Supported (
Interesting (
Inspiring (
Valuable (
