Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
November 16, 2007 at 08:23:55

View Ratings | Rate It

Ron Paul's Radical Views

FACEBOOK
submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Mike Kuykendall (about the author)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Mike Kuykendall - Writer

I have written previously about Representative Ron Paul's extremist views, but with his surging fundraising and steadily climbing poll numbers it seems another visit to this deluded Libertarian's views is in order.

Many of my non-political friends have asked my opinion on Paul. They are seduced by his anti-war views and GOP underdog status, and somehow consider him a real alternative to the current crop of warmongering Republican and "celebrity" Democratic candidates. I try hard to inform them that despite the pleasing surface, his positions are radical and he espouses a form of government never before attempted on the planet Earth;
Libertarians are a small group whose beliefs are unknown to and not accepted by the vast majority. They are utopian because there has never yet been a libertarian society (though one or two have come close to some libertarian ideas.) These two facts should not keep us from considering libertarian ideas seriously, however they do caution us about accepting them for practical purposes.
To examine Dr. Paul's positions, let's first take a quick look at a bedrock Libertarian principle;
A great degree of order in society is necessary for individuals to survive and flourish. It's easy to assume that order must be imposed by a central authority, the way we impose order on a stamp collection or a football team. The great insight of libertarian social analysis is that order in society arises spontaneously, out of the actions of thousands or millions of individuals who coordinate their actions with those of others in order to achieve their purposes. Over human history, we have gradually opted for more freedom and yet managed to develop a complex society with intricate organization. The most important institutions in human society -- language, law, money, and markets -- all developed spontaneously, without central direction.
In short, Libertarians believe government is an obstacle to personal liberty. The above author's logic is suspect, however. He says the constraints of government stop societies from empowering the individual freedoms of its citizens, all the while saying such ordered systems will be spontaneously created by the actions of millions of citizens in the absence of such controls. News flash- these systems did spontaneously generate. That's how we ended up with government to begin with! What else is government than the method by which such spontaneous relationships is exercised? In America laws were written and governmental bodies were formed, for the most part, to address real situations, not to slowly steal away the rights of citizens.

It seems like Libertarians are advocating a return to feudalism. Without government, unrestrained free markets would enrich the already powerful, allowing them to rule the way lords of old did. They controlled the assets, and the less fortunate looked to their lords to protect them and keep them alive, similar to the faith my dog has in my ability to fill his food dish.


So how about Representative Paul? Let's go over a few of his more radical positions. If after reading this those of you supporting or considering Ron Paul are not swayed that his Libertarian principles are a little kooky, or at the least require a tad more thought, then it's likely you supported Bush as well, and thus convincing you with reason was already impossible. Maybe I could dress up like God with a wig and false beard and chuck lightning bolts to change those kind of minds. Anyhow, on with the list;

These positions alone should disqualify him as a viable presidential candidate in most people's minds. Hopefully posts like this will serve to educate the public, and keep citizens from being snookered by his more popular antiwar positions.

Having the temerity to post on Ron Paul means one thing; an inevitable viral rush of Paul supporters with snide comments and logically fallacious arguments. These folks tend to proclaim long-standing support for Dr. Paul, but I suspect they are mostly disillusioned former Bush supporters, seeking a candidate to help minimize the humiliation created by the president's foolishness over the last seven years. Hopefully this post will sway a few of them back over to the side of reason and sanity.

UPDATE: I wrote a comment on Digg that came out just right so I had to link it up and re-post it here;
I sure wish Ron Paul's positions were as groundbreaking and fantastic as his supporters make out. Unfortunately he seems to me to be a supply-sider in wolf's clothing, an elitist with an elaborate political philosophy to cloak less than honorable intentions. It seems Libertarians forgot the days of the robber barons, the Vanderbilts, Carnegies, Morgans, and Harrimans. That's exactly what we would get if we relied on people's good intentions to rein in a wild, completely free market.

Government has a purpose. The different branches of our current system evolved to take care of problems that popped up organically over the lifetime of our country. People don't just wake up and say "Let's go tax the hell out of someone and regulate everything in sight." When some kid loses an eye on a toy or somebody's balls are sucked off in a pool drain the free market doesn't swoop in to make it all better. Indeed the Bush administration proves this; during their tenure toy manufacturers greedily sold our children lead-laced toys, drug companies sent dangerously under-tested drugs through a corrupt FDA to hurt and kill lots of people (think Vioxx) and contaminated produce ends up on our tables.

American history clearly shows what deregulating industry does- it hurts the average joe and enriches the elites. Anyone who makes this concept a cornerstone of their governing philosophy must be treated like they are RADIOACTIVE and be quickly and quietly led well away from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

 

http://indigentahole.blogspot.com

Mike Kuykendall is a progressive, patriotic veteran of the U.S. Air Force, fighting hard to save our democracy.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for " Antiwar Government"
Archaeology of Peace
by Jim O'Brien

$12.99

Number of pages: 108
Publisher: The Golden Eagle Press

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
93 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Bravo, bravo by Joel S. Hirschhorn on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 9:50:59 AM
Agreed by Mike Kuykendall on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:07:41 AM
At least he has views by David Martin on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:44:46 AM
Why accept anything less than the best? by Mike Kuykendall on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 2:47:50 PM
Less that the best? by Barbara Peterson on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 7:40:58 PM
What do YOU owe this nation by ardee D. on Saturday, Nov 17, 2007 at 8:21:39 AM
Agreed! Here here! by Mike Kuykendall on Saturday, Nov 17, 2007 at 11:38:44 AM
Tell me... by Mike Kuykendall on Saturday, Nov 17, 2007 at 11:34:55 AM
Sadly you waste your time by ardee D. on Friday, Nov 23, 2007 at 9:12:23 AM
your article.. by Jeremy Frombach on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:45:12 AM
I'd love to hear his tax views... by Mike Kuykendall on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 3:07:39 PM
CIA & FBI by fuzzy wzhe on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:42:21 PM
Hmm by Mike Kuykendall on Saturday, Nov 17, 2007 at 11:42:06 AM
Freedom is radical? by Jason Droon on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:47:31 AM
You can thank Bush economic policy for the dollar, chump by Mike Kuykendall on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 3:12:54 PM
Oh and by the way... by Mike Kuykendall on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 3:13:59 PM
Ron Paul's Radical Views? by Cleaner44 on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:48:08 AM
Have you forgotten Progressivism? by Mike Kuykendall on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 3:17:28 PM
baby steps by BugMan on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:11:53 AM
I say again... by Mike Kuykendall on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 3:21:56 PM
Ron Paul Radical? I think not. by Mike Folkerth on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:23:04 AM
I'm a big fan of change... by Mike Kuykendall on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 3:29:00 PM
sounds like you want the same old same old by Brad Griffeth on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:48:13 PM
Hmm by Mike Kuykendall on Saturday, Nov 17, 2007 at 11:46:12 AM
Libertarian or constitutionalist by chessmaster on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:38:26 AM
Tsk, tsk by Mike Kuykendall on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 3:31:40 PM
FBI & CIA by ibrahim turner on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 9:43:11 PM
Though I agree with you... by Mike Kuykendall on Saturday, Nov 17, 2007 at 11:49:31 AM
Ron Paul by dutchman on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:39:35 AM
Strict constructionism is radical by Mike Kuykendall on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 3:51:50 PM
What do you propose in the alternative? by Aaron Walker on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:06:51 PM
Firstly... by Mike Kuykendall on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 3:55:47 PM
Cop Out by Aaron Walker on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 4:22:17 PM
In the end... by Mike Kuykendall on Saturday, Nov 17, 2007 at 11:54:31 AM
Aaron Walker, Fort Worth, TX by ibrahim turner on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:00:18 PM
I have no problem with Ron Paul by Mike Kuykendall on Saturday, Nov 17, 2007 at 11:56:18 AM
Ron Paul by Ty on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 1:16:27 PM
I like where you're coming from... by Mike Kuykendall on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 3:59:17 PM
Federal Reserve by Ty on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 1:27:22 PM
Amen brother! by Mike Kuykendall on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 4:01:17 PM
Wrong! by rc on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 1:51:01 PM
The concept is good... by Mike Kuykendall on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 4:06:24 PM
Yes, but by Bill Samuel on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 1:51:50 PM
Here's my point, made repeatedly throughout this thread... by Mike Kuykendall on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 4:10:28 PM
Radical but a good guy by Rob Kall on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 2:34:58 PM
not a lesser of two evils by Over It on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 3:32:59 PM
Giuliani would be RED MEAT for any candidate... by Mike Kuykendall on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 4:15:20 PM
It would be interesting... by Mike Kuykendall on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 4:13:05 PM
Ron Paul's "Radical Views" are a Relief by Over It on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 2:40:10 PM
If you want a true anti-war candidate, choose Kucinich. by Mike Kuykendall on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 4:17:54 PM
I love Kucinich but... by Over It on Saturday, Nov 17, 2007 at 1:12:47 PM
My problems with your argument by Leon Kassab on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 3:24:53 PM
You must be the Libertarian version of hockey's "regulator" by Mike Kuykendall on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 4:27:52 PM
Alternates to FBI and CIA by Aaron Walker on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 4:45:44 PM
Who says? by Mike Kuykendall on Saturday, Nov 17, 2007 at 11:59:11 AM
Belated response by Leon Kassab on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 8:06:13 PM
Extremely well put by Mike Kuykendall on Saturday, Nov 17, 2007 at 12:05:46 PM
Error, no subject entered by Leon Kassab on Saturday, Nov 17, 2007 at 4:43:15 PM
Our current National Security setup???? by daveys on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 3:38:48 PM
Whoah there, buddy by Mike Kuykendall on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 4:33:49 PM
i'd vote for Paul or Kucinich by Better World Order on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 4:03:40 PM
"We The People" need some real representation by Sleeper on Saturday, Nov 17, 2007 at 10:36:05 AM
Mike, you poor lost soul!!! by Anthony Knittel on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 4:06:03 PM
Complete and utter claptrap by Mike Kuykendall on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 4:37:48 PM
The "oranically grown government to help the downtrodden" by fuzzy wzhe on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 7:10:30 PM
Whew! by Mike Kuykendall on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 4:45:22 PM
Sure, I'll answer you! by fuzzy wzhe on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 7:53:37 PM
I Agree With Anthony by Brad Evans on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 4:48:52 PM
Let me get this straight... by Mike Kuykendall on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 7:09:57 PM
Except of course, by Mike Kuykendall on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 7:12:06 PM
re: Let me get this straight... by fuzzy wzhe on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 7:23:59 PM
If Ron Paul is a Republican... by Over It on Saturday, Nov 17, 2007 at 1:31:46 PM
Building Momentum Against A Corrupt Oligarchy by Ed Encho on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 7:30:11 PM
Hey Mike by Greg Albert on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:27:58 PM
Oh jesus by Greg Albert on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:29:35 PM
Paul would return the government to the people by Sleeper on Friday, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:59:30 PM
Following the constitution is Radical? by Sean Freeman on Saturday, Nov 17, 2007 at 7:33:25 AM
National security? by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo on Saturday, Nov 17, 2007 at 9:36:59 AM
Just Remember! by iman on Saturday, Nov 17, 2007 at 3:23:15 PM
Denial runs deep these days by sharon kayser on Sunday, Nov 18, 2007 at 9:41:16 AM
Ron Paul really radical?? by sharon kayser on Sunday, Nov 18, 2007 at 3:06:08 PM
Ron Paul by E E on Sunday, Nov 18, 2007 at 10:12:04 AM
Logic, History, and Respect by reasonableperson on Sunday, Nov 18, 2007 at 6:20:51 PM
Correction by reasonableperson on Sunday, Nov 18, 2007 at 6:30:53 PM
Ron Paul is Jerk by pratliff94 on Friday, Nov 23, 2007 at 11:11:08 AM
More Sticks and Stones by reasonableperson on Friday, Nov 23, 2007 at 8:27:54 PM
You made me smile, Reverend by ardee D. on Sunday, Nov 25, 2007 at 10:12:42 AM
Ardee by pratliff94 on Sunday, Nov 25, 2007 at 5:28:00 PM
The benefit of the doubt by ardee D. on Sunday, Nov 25, 2007 at 7:28:20 PM
Kudos to Mr. Kuykendall by ardee D. on Saturday, Nov 24, 2007 at 9:54:43 AM
Feeling Left Out of the Fray by reasonableperson on Saturday, Nov 24, 2007 at 11:55:09 PM
Generalisations never work, do they? by ardee D. on Sunday, Nov 25, 2007 at 10:04:35 AM
Never Say Never by reasonableperson on Monday, Nov 26, 2007 at 2:35:06 PM

 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2010, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum