Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Vote to End Bush's War

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Despite what you may have heard on the news, the election on November 7th is not really about Republican pedophiles and the people who love them. It is about ending the occupation of Iraq and bringing the troops home--or it should be.

As of October 7, 2006, the Department of Defense reported 2742 Americans have died and 20,687 have been wounded in Mr. Bush's war. Over 2000 of those deaths took place after "Top Gun" George declared, "mission accomplished".

The Pentagon reported that American troops in Iraq were attacked an average of 792 times each week in August. That's 113 attacks each day or one attack every 13 minutes. In September, 776 U.S. troops were wounded; and 33 Americans were killed in just the first nine days of October. We cannot allow this to continue.
.
A majority of Americans believe Mr. Bush's decision to invade Iraq was a mistake; but mistake is the wrong word. It was not a mistake. It was a deliberate, premeditated attack on a third-world nation, designed to create "political capital" for George W. Bush. The decision to go to war may have been wrong and stupid and illegal; but it was not a mistake. The mistake is staying there any longer--sacrificing more American lives and squandering America's military capabilities.

In November 2005, the Center for American Progress released a report that predicted "[I]f we still have 140,000 ground troops in Iraq a year from now, we will destroy the all-volunteer army" (The report was co-authored by Lawrence J. Korb, Assistant Secretary of Defense during the Reagan administration). Eleven months later, we still had 147,000 troops in Iraq (Army Times, 9/13/06), and the Army is making plans to maintain current troop levels in Iraq through 2010 (MSNBC, 10/11/06). How can they do that?

• "[The Pentagon] delayed for six weeks the return home of about 4,000 U.S. soldiers in Iraq's volatile Anbar province -- the second extension of U.S. forces in the country in two months -- as the insurgency and rising sectarian violence exert heavier demands on a stretched American ground force."- - Washington Post, 9/26/06

• Every available active-duty combat brigade has served at least one tour in Iraq or Afghanistan, and many have served two or three. Likewise, the vast majority of Army National Guardsmen and Reservists have been mobilized since Sept. 11, 2001, some more than once." --Washington Post, 9/14/06


• "Strains on the Army from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have become so severe that Army officials say they may be forced to make greater use of the National Guard to provide enough troops for overseas deployments." -- New York Times, 9/21/06 (don't expect an announcement before the election)

In August 2005, the Institute for Policy Studies reported:

• By May 2005, the Bush Administration had used "stop-loss orders" to keep more than 14,000 soldiers on active duty beyond their expected discharge date, in an attempt to maintain troop levels.

• The Army's surgeon general reported that 30 percent of U.S. troops have developed stress-related mental health problems three to four months after coming home from the Iraq War. (About 1 million American troops have served so far in the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. You do the math).

Since Mr.Bush decided to invade Iraq, the Army has quadrupled its recruitment bonuses, lowered its standards, raised its maximum enlistment age, and cut down the numbers who "wash out" in basic training; but it has still not been able to meet its personnel goals (Washington Post, 9/14/06).

• "The invasion of Iraq I believe will turn out to be the greatest strategic disaster in U.S. history." --Retired Army Lt. Gen. William Odom, The Lowell Sun, 9/30/05

Ignoring all reality, President Bush vows, "I will not withdraw, even if Laura and Barney [his dog] are the only ones supporting me." I seriously doubt that Barney supports the war, but Mr. Bush doesn't need to worry. He will always have the support of the neoconservatives who still dream of world domination, the war profiteers who benefit from the protection of our military, and his biggest fans--al Qaeda.

• "In a letter to their Iraq organization, al Qaeda's leadership wrote, 'The most important thing is that you continue in your jihad in Iraq... Indeed, prolonging the war is in our interest...' The letter contradicts the administration's talking point that withdrawal is 'precisely what they want.'" --The Progress Report, 10/6/06

Otherwise, there is little support for Mr. Bush's war. A study conducted by the Institute for Policy Studies and Foreign Policy In Focus found that 72% of American troops serving in Iraq think the U.S. should exit the country within the next year, and 29% believe we should leave Iraq "immediately". (This was 14 months ago).

In early September 2006, the Program on International Policy Attitudes conducted a poll of Iraqi public opinion. It found:

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Mick Youther is an American citizen, an independent voter, a veteran, a parent, a Christian, a scientist, a writer, and all-around nice guy who has been aroused from a comfortable apathy by the high crimes and misdemeanors of the Bush Administration.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Scientists Discover That Conservatives Are Brain-Dead

It is Time to Raise Taxes on the Wealthy and Save the American Dream

The Rottenness of John McCain

Why Are We Still Fighting in Afghanistan?

Bu$hWorld--The End Game

One Word to Describe Bush and Bush as a Vocabulary Word

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments