As a writer, I am constantly searching for the "right word " to express what I want to say. For almost three years, I 've been looking for the right word to describe the Presidency of George W. Bush.
I should mention that any time I refer to something Bush has said or done, I am actually referring to the carefully orchestrated appearance of reality that we know as George W. Bush. This illusion is the product of an elite team of pollsters, propagandists, and media manipulators. There would be no George W. Bush, as we know him, without the people that make his decisions, write his speeches, teach him his sound bites, and point him toward the podium.
There are a lot of words that could be used to describe the Bush Presidency, but I wanted to find that one perfect word that best expresses its essence. This is how I found the right word.
I knew that any description of Bush had to include the hypocrisy and deceit that permeates everything he says and does. From his cowboy act to his concern for the military families, it is all deception. His words are chosen carefully, using false arguments and false associations to frighten and mislead as many people as possible. Even when Bush is not telling outright lies, he seems incapable of speaking without stretching, bending, twisting or somehow perverting the truth. In his defense; how would you like to try to justify the war in Iraq and Bush 's fiscal policies without lying? --It can 't be done.
Bush 's most apparent personal characteristic is his ignorance. Will Rogers said, " ...everybody is ignorant, only on different subjects. " The question is --what is Bush 's subject? I believe he was a history major in college, but he doesn 't even seem to remember historic events that took place in his lifetime --thus condemning us to repeat them. He has already involved us in another Viet Nam, and it looks like another Watergate is on the way. A question that is often asked, "Is his ignorance feigned or real? " Rumors are regularly leaked from the White House that Bush isn 't as dumb as he seems, but I bet when the Congressional hearings start to investigate him, he will proudly plead ignorance.
Bush describes himself as a Christian. He fits the narrow definition of "one who professes a belief in Jesus Christ ", but if you extend the definition to include motives and behavior, you start running into some troubling questions: What kind of Christian authorizes the execution of a fellow Christian and mocks her pleas for mercy? Or exhibits delight just before he unleashes a rain of death and destruction down on innocent Iraqis? Who would Jesus torture?
His passion for war is another of Bush 's less admirable traits. He and a good number of his Administration are Chickenhawks --they supported the war in Viet Nam, they just didn 't care to participate. Bush said he didn 't want to have to shoot himself in the foot to avoid going, so he jumped to the head of the line and got into Texas Air National Guard. Even then, he disappeared for a year and failed to fulfill his military obligation.
It eventually became clear that sometimes there is just no word to describe a thing --especially something as complex as Bush. Even if there was a word that adequately described Bush today, it would soon be obsolete because he is continually adding to his repertoire of high crimes and misdemeanors. He is a liar, a hypocrite, a demagogue. He is the law. He is judge, jury and executioner. He is a spymaster and a torturer. He is Commander in Chief. He is the man who would be king, or dictator, or emperor.
There also appears to be some kind of mysterious, indefinable power that separates and protects Bush from reality. Otherwise: How can Bush fail to react to numerous warnings of attacks before 9/11, and then base his next campaign on the proposition that only he can keep America safe? How can a draft dodger make himself seem tougher than a war hero? How can someone, who has been wrong about absolutely everything in Iraq, continue to speak with an air of infallible certainty and expect to be believed without question? How can Bush talk about fiscal responsibility, while turning a record surplus into a record deficit --borrowing two billion dollars every day, just to keep things running?
Reflecting on these contradictory events, I thought to myself --It 's downright Orwellian. That is when the answer hit me. Here is a single word, Orwellian, which can represent life in the world of "Big Brother" --as described in George Orwell 's novel, 1984. And there 's the word Machiavellian: a single word that describes the political principles and methods advocated by Niccolo Machiavelli, a Florentine Statesman, in 1517.
It was clear. The convergence of circumstances and conditions, brought about by George W. Bush 's presidency can only be described by a word derived from the name of its creator. Following the form of the previous examples, the word would be "Bushian "; but I wanted something that sounded a little more modern, so I propose a new definition for the word -- "Bush ".
Bush (boosh) adj. 1. of or relating to George W. Bush. n. 1. a person elevated by money and powerful interests to a position far above his abilities. 2. an amoral, deceitful, self-righteous hypocrite: COMPASSIONATE CONSERVATIVE 3. an inarticulate nincompoop, who believes himself to be amusing. 4. a corrupt, scheming demagogue, ruling an Orwellian world using Machiavellian principles. v. 1. To screw up everything --completely. 2. to use the vast resources of the government to attack and malign those who oppose you.
Be sure to use it in a sentence today. (e.g., He is a real Bush.[or] Anybody that Bush ought to be in jail.)