Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
December 17, 2007 at 10:52:59

View Ratings | Rate It

The John Edwards Landslide

by Michael Fox     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

Tell A Friend

Back in October, I wrote that it was critical that Democrats select a surefire winner in our Presidential primary.   At that time I made the case fore John Edwards’ win-ability.   My prognostication has now been made official in the form of this week’s CNN poll, which pitted Clinton, Obama, and Edwards individually and Head-to head with each major Republican contender. 

Once again, in every one of those match-ups, Edwards wins by the largest margin against any of the Republicans.  And what could be more valuable a statement in the 2008 general election than a landslide?  

Remember, after the 2004 election, George Bush made his bloviating statement about his perceived “political capital” – which, of course he squandered on a 60-city tour to sell his dead-on-arrival Social Security privatization scheme.  That, with a 2-point “win”   

But, given (as in CNN’s Edwards vs. Huckabee race) a 25-point true landslide, the political capital would be palpable and spendable.  Edwards, winning with a foreseeable 65% of the vote, would be coming in with that sort of long-unseen approval rating that would enable him to embark on populist policies with the actual backing of the populace (unlike the elitist policies of Bush ineptly attempted to be served to his handpicked audiences – and even they didn’t bite!).   

Much has been written about Edwards as the worst nightmare of the corporate crowd.  Just this week, on Bill Moyers’ Journal, Dr. Ronald Walters (director of Jesse Jackson’s Presidential bids) pointed out that only Edwards, of the three leading contenders, is speaking of poverty and universal healthcare; this from a leading Black academic who clearly sees Obama as not having policies that serve the larger Black community, those in the middle and lower middle classes and the poor.   

Only Edwards (again, of the three leading contenders) has eschewed PAC and corporate donations.   Clinton, Obama and Edwards all have law degrees.  Clinton used hers, aside from early-career service on the congressional committee investigating Richard Nixon, as a partner in a law firm representing corporate clients; Obama was an Associate Professor of Constitutional Law at Harvard (this is the resume item I like best about him, as I think he may best be equipped to assess the damage done by Bush and his Republican Congresses); but only Edwards used his to take on corporations which have fought regulation and responsibility to consumers.  Only Edwards is proposing immediate universal healthcare. 

An extremely conservative acquaintance of mine wrote me - in answer to my advocacy of universal healthcare - that she is utterly opposed to it, and prefers health savings accounts, the party line of the Republicans.  As it happens, this middle aged woman is a well-employed professional with a decent insurance plan provided by her employer.   What she is not considering is that with her pre-existing conditions (obesity and a documented  heart condition), should she lose her job, for whatever reason, she will be uninsurable, and her savings – even if they amount to a few hundred thousand dollars – won’t get her through one hospital stay, and she will be left with no savings and a ton of debt.  When I suggested to this woman that even GM and Ford are now some of the top advocates for universal healthcare (without it, they will be building all their cars in Canada), she dismissed them as seeking “corporate welfare.”  So which is it - Corporate welfare or public welfare?  In fact, it’s neither.  It seems to me that right now the biggest welfare recipients in the country are the health insurance companies themselves.  In fact, they’ve figured out how to bypass the government and take their’s directly. 

Edwards seeks to put a stop to this nonsense.  Additionally, he has made it clear that the mistakes he has made, legislatively, are mistakes from which he has learned, and he is opposed to “free” trade expansion.   

The media have been focused almost exclusively on Clinton and Obama, whether it’s the Oprahpalooza tour or the obscene cocaine red herring.  Nevertheless, the public is hearing the message from Edwards, no thanks to Clear Channel, News Corp,, Disney, Time Warner, and Viacom and General Electric, and Tribune Corp (the 7 companies that control 90% of what you see, hear and read).   

I happen to really like Sen. Chris Dodd and Rep. Dennis Kucinich.  I think that Sen. Joseph Biden would make a terrific diplomat (clearly he’s got charisma and humor that are vital, and have been woefully lacking in those spheres).  But none of those guys is going to win a single electoral vote.  Sorry, my liberal brethren and sisteren, they’re just not, so it’s time to wake up and decide to not waste your vote.   

Primaries are less than two months away in most states.  It’s time to decide to be responsible with your primary vote.  Unfortunately for the idealist, the gender/race thing is not what matters, really.  What matters is bringing in a 21st century FDR.  Vote for Edwards.  And see the Democratic landslide in November.

Michael Fox is not connected to the Edwards campaign - or any other.

 

Michael Fox is a writer and economist based in Los Angeles. He has been a corporate controller, professor, and small business entrepreneur. After a life-altering accident, he spent five years learning more about medicine and the healthcare (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Class Clinton Hillary"
Rebels in White Gloves: Coming of Age with the Wellesley Class of '69
by Miriam Horn

$24.00
Lowest New Price $0.99

Number of pages: 328
Publisher: Crown

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 comments


Edwards Landslide

I hope now that Edwards is actually getting some media coverage that Democrats will take another look at him. He is clearly the most progressive candidate of the three frontrunners in Iowa and he is the most electable as demonstrated by not only the recent CNN poll, but other head-to-head matchup polls over the course of the campaign.

 Today on Hardball Ralph Nader even said good things about Edwards. I think if Edwards is our nominee we won't have to worry about another Nader run against our candidate. But leaving Ralph aside Edwards is the best natural campaigner in the race. He has been outspent by Obama & Clinton and given far less media coverage and yet his vision for America has kept him in a statistical three-way tie in Iowa.  And he won over the undecided voters in both the CNN & Fox focus groups after the last debate. Imagine how effective he would be with the entire Democratic Party behind him.

There is no doubt in my mind that with Edwards as our nominee we can fiinally reclaim our democracy by ending the corporate stranglehold that controls Washington and that has prevented government from working for the people. 

 

by Patty Morlan (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 3 comments) on Monday, Dec 17, 2007 at 5:31:51 PM

Recommend  (0+)

Ralph Nader says

that only Edwards is a true progressive that he could support; but the media have worked hard to kill his campaign

by Joel S. Hirschhorn (141 articles, 50 quicklinks, 65 diaries, 546 comments [2 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Monday, Dec 17, 2007 at 5:51:18 PM

Recommend  (0+)

John Edwards

He learned a critical point in the last elections after CNN destroyed Howard Dean with a 5 second video clip. John Edwards is very careful that the people elect him and not CNN with all their "expert" newzzz reporters.

by IwasJulius (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 31 comments) on Tuesday, Dec 18, 2007 at 11:53:22 AM

Recommend  (0+)

Congratulations for bringing these facts to public attention

I believe most people would pick Edwards in a heartbeat if they knew he could beat any Repub candidate. And that is the name of this game. Select someone electable who shares your values.

I just hope Edwards has competent, vigilant bodyguards with him at all times.

I, too, like Kucinich a lot, but he doesn't have a prayer.

If you dislike anything about Edwards, please keep saying to yourself "anybody but a Repugnant again. Let's pick a winner."

Beth

by Beth Grimes (3 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 25 comments) on Tuesday, Dec 18, 2007 at 5:18:31 PM

Recommend  (0+)

I think you're right on two counts

I think Edwards is gonna take it too. He acts like he knows it too. I hope he is very careful about his bodily security. Must be a lot of people hate him.

But what I think you're really right about is this: "Primaries are less than two months away in most states. It’s time to decide to be responsible with your primary vote.

The primary system adds such a weird skew to the American electoral system. As you say, Kucinich probably has no chance in the primary system, although he probably would stand a chance in a national vote once he got some camera attention. Too much depends on looks (Dennis should really urge his wife to swoop the TV circuit.) and whether you can get the media to suck your cockanamey.

When I watch debate clips and stuff, it comes across to me as surreal. It's so Hollywood, every bit of it. It is like a science fiction movie. Some of the candidates just get totally ignored because of some weird obsession everybody has with polling numbers that change like the weather. Do horserace bettors behave the same way? I bet they do.

For starters, I think people should get off their asses and vote where it matters most - in the primaries.

So I've been reposting this link a lot:

How to Vote in Primaries and Not Be an Idiot

 

by Peter Dearman (10 articles, 32 quicklinks, 9 diaries, 144 comments [1 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Dec 19, 2007 at 10:16:30 AM

Recommend  (0+)

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Photo Essay: Thoughts for the Fourth of July: Talking the Talk and Walking the Walk for Peace by Mac McKinney

Rothschild's Federal Reserve Must Be Abolished by Allen L Roland

Health Insurance Exec Whistleblower Wendell Potter Testifies Before Congress by Wendell Potter

Obama Has No Legal Authority For Afghan War by Sherwood Ross

Dept. of State Spokesman Addresses McKinney's Capture by Meryl Ann Butler

Hypocritical Repugnicans Owe WJ Clinton an Apology by David Gray

Torture on the 4th of July by Lawrence Gist

Our Nation has a Great Deal to Learn from Phillip Butler about Morality, Law, and Torture by Lawrence Gist

A Not-So-Glorious Fourth Posted by Josh Mitteldorf

Capricorn Full Moon Eclipse 2009 by Cathy Lynn Pagano

Go To Top 50 Most Popular

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum