Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (1 comment)

Broder the Banal

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)
Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

David Broder continues his "exhibited loyalty" (to borrow a term from the Bush regime) to the GOP in a pair of columns in the Post this week, having long ago jettisoned honest journalism. 

The Post columnist, hailed as the “Dean of the Washington Press Corp,” has a column today dismantled by Greg Sargent in Talking Points Memo. 

Sargent notes Broder rushing in to defend the Republicans by knocking down a story in yesterday’s Times “that questions the political health of the GOP.” 

The problem is that Broder in his analysis of the Times piece omits crucial point after point from the text, the inclusion of which would render Broder’s column utterly vacuous. 

“Broder was so eager to attack the Times for besmirching the honor of the GOP that he snip-snip-snipped those inconvenient facts away,” writes Sargent. But that’s par for Broder.

In Monday’s column, The Fading Freedom Mission, Broder mourns that: “To be blunt, the Bush prescription for American foreign policy -- an aggressive effort to expand freedom and democracy around the globe -- has lost its credibility.” 

Gee, why would that be? 

You might think that Broder’s assertion that Bush’s foreign policy is as “an aggressive effort to expand freedom and democracy around the globe” might at least merit stating some factual basis, maybe a passing reference to an academic freedom index measuring civil freedoms brought about by Bush’s freedom mission, or perhaps a noting of the new civil liberties now enjoyed by people living in Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, for example. (Wonderful places to live, if you like to criticize the government and current social arrangementsJ.) 

But no, there is no reference to human rights groups’ praise, or civil libertarians extolling the virtues of Bush. 

For factual support of his contention of the existence of a Bushian “effort to expand freedom and democracy,” Broder offers one fact: that Bush himself said so in the second inaugural address, so, obviously, it must be true, though as the piece notes, lots of Americans don’t believe much that Bush says these days. 

Yep, Bush did say so, over and over again. And this week we were reminded of this, thanks to the piercing insight and the typically Herculean journalistic efforts of David Broder.

###

 

http://malcontends.blogspot.com/

Michael Leon is a writer living in Madison, Wisconsin. His writing has appeared nationally in The Progressive, In These Times, and CounterPunch. He can be reached at maleon64@yahoo.com.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Editor

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The quality that makes a medicore windbag like Broder into by Richard Mynick on Thursday, Mar 15, 2007 at 11:00:28 AM