The Enemies Within The Bush Family and their 50 Year War Against the USA
The CIA called him the Ice Pick, because of the cruel callousness with which he meted out tragedies for his enemies and any hapless innocents who got in their way. The general US public knows him as "Poppy Bush" -- that smiling and occasionally elderly weeping shell of a man whose son has finished the job many feel he was to begin in his second term. It's a commonly held opinion that Bush the Elder was somehow a more benevolent President. If he was, it was an accident of history.
Truly, in one way or another, the Bush family has ruled this country like an unseen monarchy since 1980. Before that, they were strongly represented among the ruling class. It's commonly accepted that Ronald Reagan -- probably already suffering from early Alzheimer's disease when he was elected -- was merely a puppet for his then-Vice President, George the Elder.
I think it entirely plausible that George Sr. was behind the attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan. I mean, really, what are the chances that Reagan's assassin just happened to be the son of Bush's old friend?
Had Reagan died, their whole takeover timeline would have moved up. As he didn't, George "won" re-election on the coattails of the first cartoon President and Poppy Bush emerged supreme.
It makes me wonder why Bush Sr. suddenly became so ill in his later years of the Presidency. He was a comparatively young President, at the time, and yet he was stricken with one ailment after another, threatening to unleash upon us what would surely have been the USA's (then) dumbest President, Dan Quayle ... a man so stupid he couldn't spell as well as a 5th grader.
Was Quayle to be the first attempt on our democracy, just in time for the right-wing forces in the EU to emerge triumphant as a single nation state? It makes me wonder. He'd have come to the fore through no folly of our own -- just an accident of being Bush's VP if the President himself were too ill to continue in office.
Certainly, to have Quayle rush us into another Iraq conflict and a head-to-head contest with Iran, would have set-up a very similar situation to the one we have now. And as Bush Sr. had such deep contacts in Iran prior to Jimmy Carter's loss to Reagan, one can imagine many of the pieces might have been put in place early on.
But some of the pieces may have been put in place even earlier than that.
Shall we do away with idiotic reservations about Royalty's compulsion to murder their opponents? They have done so for ages. I feel John F. Kennedy and his brother Robert were both murdered by elements of the same cabal that then brought Nixon into power, setting up Watergate, to say nothing of sinking our country into the worst morass of CIA misdeeds ever carried out by a single nation. All this, at the behest of the Bush family. When you look at all the names surrounding Watergate, the CIA involvement in murder and espionage, and the present administration, you see the same names cropping up: Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld. Nixon was amongst them until his death.
We must ask ourselves for whom has this been good? Who stood most to gain from the post-JFK attack on our government (under the guise of Reagan wanting "small government"), our educational system (to dumb us down), our media via mass corporate buy-ups? Arabs? Hardly. Jews? Please! Aristocrats, my friends ... aristocrats -- European and American aristocrats have always hated the USA because of the sense it belongs to its people. We've done many good things, we've accomplished much, we are in possession of vast resources which are ours by right of our forefathers' sacrifices. How else to bring us down like the common trash we are?
Bush. That's the only name you need to know -- Bush. The same Bush family who are strongly allied with the UK Tory government and its most staunch right-wing. You may remember our country's history with Tories.
King George the younger's swagger and smirk say it all. This C student, this wash-out at everything he has ever tried, this trust fund barnacle and unashamed beneficiary of nepotism, knows he's better than we are in the eyes of these people. He is merely displaying his primate tendencies, but he can ignore that because he doesn't believe in that silly evolution stuff.
We have only to look into the connections between these "neoconservatives" and their international brothers to see the face of the enemy shaping up. PNAC in the US, the Henry Jackson Society in the UK, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard whose one-man campaign against Bill Clinton certainly seemed oddly-timed, and others.
During the Civil War, our enemies sought to put pressure on the US fault line by splitting up the north and south and, what do you know, we now have a very similar situation.
My European friends have much to be proud of in their own cultures. I share those cultures. My ancestral homeland is Great Britain (except for the 1/4 of me that belongs to the Cherokee). My heart is and will always be with the people of Europe and the government of Europe that serves those people, but just as we have a solid US aristocracy plotting against the populace, they have one as well.
I am self-employed as a writer and internet traffic consultant. I have a degree in cultural anthropology. I've been married for thirty years to my college sweetheart. We have one son. My family has been in the USA for 350 years. I take right-wing incursions personally.
Exactly ! How do you turn an oil tanker with a row boat? If dumb keeps on getting dumber the u.s. will soon become a bad science fiction movie with the poor rattling the chain link fences of the gated communities while the black water boys lock and load. Wake up america !! O and by the way my brother and law worked for the EU for 6 months until he quit, calling the EU the most crooked organization on earth. Abe Lincoln said, "Most men can handle adversity, if you want to find the true measure of a man give him power." Ain't it the truth. Yup, I'm an X pat.
by
davy (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 241 comments)
on Saturday, July 14, 2007 at 4:33:40 AM
Thank you, davy, I appreciate your taking the time to let me know you liked my article. Let's hope we're embarking on a new era of sanity in the States but at this point, I'd say it's 50-50.
by
Melody Clark (6 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 10 comments)
on Monday, July 16, 2007 at 1:21:07 AM
Dear Melody, enjoyed your article ref Bush family war against the U.S. and can't find fault in any of it to dispute.
However, cannot say the same for the reference to Unionism. Am aware unionism is looked down on in the U.S. and there is incredible political pressure to minimise and make unions irelevant.
Here in Australia, we've had good unionisation over the last 50 years, and the work they have done, is reflected in our working conditions that we have to this very day. In fact every Australian worker is entitled to a minimum of FOUR WEEKS PAID ANNUAL LEAVE each calender year, as well as one paid sick day per month (compare that to what the U.S. worker has in comparision)which is allowed to accumilate for a year.
There are many more conditons that were hard fought for and painfully gained over the preceeding years, however since the Howard Govts last re-election the attack against unionism is unprecidented. Our country was the FIRST country in the Western World to introduce the 40 hour week, and the Howard Govt has destroyed this hard fought for condition for all Australians. We are now expected to work unlimited hours per week, if this means 12 hour days and 6 sometimes 7 day working weeks, too bad. Previously all working Australians were allowed to retire at the age of 65 years and receive a Govt pension, now were are expected to work until we drop.
Incidentaly, the above mentioned pension, the Govt claims the older citizens are too many in number and there will be insufficient funds to cater for them all to receive a Govt pension.
Many citizens accept this, after all, would our very own Government LIE to us ? Yet the very sad FACTS are, in 1954 the Govt then introduced this very same pension scheme and to fund this scheme, they increased pay as your earn taxes by 6%. These taxes would be deducted automaticaly from workers pay and invested in Govt bonds for future use, thus there should be more then enough funds available for all retirees, despite the lies our government tells us.
The SAD thing in all this, is the citizens who are/were aware of all the above are now dead or too old to recall all the facts, luckily I have some elderly friends who still have all their facilities and can clearly remember these events and from whence the information can be obtained to verify what they recall.
At the same time he has attacked unionism and made many inroads to minimise their power and effect to such an extent they are almost on a par now with unions in America,(maybe he's received instructions from his good mate in the Whitehouse ?) he's even got many Australians believing unions are evil and he's doing them a favour, people are turning their backs on unions in droves. Usually the story goes, "what does a Union do for me ?" If you tell them every condition of employment they have was won by a union, they give you a blank stare and respond by "union leaders are bullies and thugs usually looking after their own interests".
Whilst in 'some' cases this is true, the FACT is, without sanction of the union members, such leaders would never have acheived the position of high office they hold, and therein lies the problem for unions IMHO.
People these days are so smug and complacent in their comfort zone that previous union members have fought for, in many cases with their own blood, sadly the memories of such struggles are never printed or readily displayed so soon forgotten. People these days begrudge the time required to assist their unions to function properly. Very few will even attend union meetings, (in many cases, this is justified by excessive workloads placed upon them by their employers) thus depriving the union hierarchy of the democratic process needed for a union to function. The leaders are left without instruction from the rank and file, then in the absence of same, must make decisions that they hope the rank and file will accept.
In my experience, the acceptance of such decisons was very small, as actual gains made by officials were usually small thus rank and file looked upon such advances with scorn and derided their leaders, never realising they were further eroding their own union.
When I hear the words, unions are useless and redundant" I usually respond why do they think this is so, and they rant and rave with what they think is justification, I then ask them when was the last time they attended a union meeting, and in EVERY CASE, they've NEVER attended a meeting at all. I then tell them, if they are serious to indentifying the reasons that their union has failed them, they need look no further then their bathroom mirror which will reflect for them, one of the respondants guilty for that failure.
Needless to say, from thereon my popularity stakes hit rock bottom.
Whilst the above has been written with Australian conditions in mind, I have a funny suspicion they also apply within the U.S. Please, tell me I'm wrong.
by
Eddy Schmid (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 197 comments)
on Saturday, July 14, 2007 at 8:06:20 AM
The opinion against unions stated in the argument was my stepmother's, not mine. My grandfather's teenage stepbrother lost a hand to a machine in a factory when he was barely old enough to drive a car. Thereafter, my grandfather was a staunch union organizer in a place where it wasn't popular. I grew up with unions in my blood.
The point I contrasted in the article was that the USA may seem unnecessary to those who are shrugging off our current situation, but they'll find out how necessary we may be as soon as we no longer exist -- which is what my stepmother found out when the unions in competing companies left and she was dumped just like the other folk were.
Howard is nothing but a Bush clone. In fact, Howard's son worked on his re-selection campaign. They're all part of a global Anglo aristocracy.
by
Melody Clark (6 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 10 comments)
on Monday, July 16, 2007 at 1:19:26 AM
I really like your style of thinking in your article about Bush; 50 year war against USA. You bring out a lot of interconnections between various events and people involved in those events. You may find more about the Bush Family connections in the Bolshevist Revolution if you check the names of those few original founders. One had a long Russian name with the syllable "Bush" right in the middle. The President does not run this country or his administration anymore; there is a great structure of invisible men making him comply with their long term well thought out plans. You can find much more on these "Interconnections" in Michael Collins Piper's book "High Priests Of War" pub. by American Free Press. And incidentally your 1/4 Cherokee actually contains a lot of British-European stock too. Unions have good intentions from the grass-roots but they, alas, also become 'aristicratically' dominated very quickly, just as our government does. "Been There; Done That" in 78 years of hard labor. Got the TEE SHIRT.
by
Green Cat (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 5 comments)
on Saturday, July 14, 2007 at 2:07:38 PM
Thanks for the book recommendation. I'll look it up.
Actually, I personally think there are deeper connections than we know between the Irish and the Native Americans, but that's for another time. lol
Unions may not be perfect (nothing is, when you're dealing with a primate society), but they are one way for individuals to have a voice in the face of huge corporations.
by
Melody Clark (6 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 10 comments)
on Monday, July 16, 2007 at 1:25:06 AM
