Tag(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (22 comments)

No, George, Diplomacy Is Not Appeasement

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (8 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

On May 15, George W. Bush gave a speech to the Israeli Knesset in which he took an apparent swipe at Barack Obama's promise of diplomacy in foreign policy.

"Some seem to believe that we should negotiate with the terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along," Bush told his audience.

He added, "We have an obligation to call this what it is -- the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history."

He even dragged Hitler into the same speech, seeming to imply that Obama would have probably wanted to appease the Nazis.

This is a prime example of the Bushco strategy of twisting words, distorting their meanings, and exaggerating the resulting untruths to the point of absurdity.

No, George, diplomacy is not appeasement. And diplomacy has not been repeatedly discredited by history. In fact, diplomacy is what has made possible today's modern globalized civil society, imperfect though it may be.


But there are some things that surely will be discredited by history.

Like ignoring a daily briefing entitled "Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US."

Like using a national tragedy as an excuse to invade an oil-rich country that had nothing to do with that tragedy and which, at the time, posed no threat to the U.S. or our allies.

Like detaining our prisoners in the "war on terror" for years without due process, even though a study by Seton Hall University found that 55 percent of Gitmo detainees are not determined to have committed any hostile acts against the United States or its coalition allies.

Like authorizing the use of torture in interrogations, even though it is illegal and immoral, and even though it doesn't work, and even as you look into the camera and tell the world, "We do not torture."

Like warrantless wiretapping of American citizens.

Like outing a covert CIA agent -- one who, incidentally (and ironically), was responsible for ensuring that the bad guys (Iran, Iraq, etc.) did not get nuclear weapons.

Like vetoing a bill that would provide health care for children because it would necessitate a raise in cigarette taxes.

Like vacationing while New Orleans was drowning.

And like arrogantly refusing to engage in diplomatic discussions with anyone you disagree with.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Mary Shaw is a Philadelphia-based writer and activist, with a focus on politics, human rights, and social justice. She is a former Philadelphia Area Coordinator for the Nobel-Prize-winning human rights group Amnesty International, and her views (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
22 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Mary, let me ask you a question. by steve scheetz on Sunday, May 18, 2008 at 1:10:35 PM
Mary, let me ask you a question. by steve scheetz on Sunday, May 18, 2008 at 1:11:58 PM
Iran has sought diplomaitc means all along by Houston Radical on Sunday, May 18, 2008 at 7:39:06 PM
Bush has no diplomacy, period. by TomK on Sunday, May 18, 2008 at 1:43:58 PM
Mr Sheetz, could the reason a by Stanimal on Sunday, May 18, 2008 at 4:52:01 PM
100 % Correct! by Houston Radical on Sunday, May 18, 2008 at 7:42:04 PM
The short answer is NO. by steve scheetz on Monday, May 19, 2008 at 9:02:17 AM
Diplomacy isn't profitable either! by Munich on Sunday, May 18, 2008 at 9:17:09 PM
Your wrong by David C Beach on Monday, May 19, 2008 at 2:39:57 AM
Do you think it's impossible... by waldopaper on Monday, May 19, 2008 at 5:44:04 AM
One can always tell when by David C Beach on Monday, May 19, 2008 at 3:28:36 PM
Appeasement. by douglas kay on Monday, May 19, 2008 at 7:10:30 AM
Bad Guys by douglas kay on Monday, May 19, 2008 at 7:20:11 AM
Appeasement Works by John Hanks on Monday, May 19, 2008 at 7:49:58 AM
Appeasement Works? by steve scheetz on Monday, May 19, 2008 at 9:09:33 AM
????????? by Michael McCormick on Monday, May 19, 2008 at 10:19:34 AM
These comments are satire,,, by waldopaper on Monday, May 19, 2008 at 12:45:09 PM
I asked a question, by steve scheetz on Monday, May 19, 2008 at 2:29:26 PM
Answer: by Maxwell on Wednesday, May 21, 2008 at 10:10:32 AM
These comments are satire? by Michael McCormick on Monday, May 19, 2008 at 3:01:32 PM
It's a "straw man" argument... by waldopaper on Tuesday, May 20, 2008 at 1:52:28 PM
Good grain! by Maxwell on Wednesday, May 21, 2008 at 10:15:59 AM