Gore's Not the Only One Who Won

SAVE AS FAVORITE

VIEW FAVORITES

By Mary Lyon (about the author) Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com Permalink

For OpEdNews: Mary Lyon - Writer

10 16 07

Gore's Not the Only One Who Won

by Mary Lyon

Pardon my cackling. I'm savoring my win.

The man from whom the highest American honor imaginable was stolen at the end of 2000 has now been awarded the highest honor the world community has to offer. And. I. Am. Loving. It.

Al Gore's Nobel Peace Prize is richly-deserved. By all rights he should be accepting it in Oslo at the end of this year as a magnificent bookend near the conclusion of his second term as the forty-third President of the United States, at the opposite end of his triumph over George W. Bush seven years ago. Perhaps he wouldn't have had the time to develop public awareness about the crisis of global warming if he'd had the kind of load on his shoulders that any competent president has to carry. Or maybe, with the clout, luster, and bully-pulpit of the White House at his command, he could have put that much more "oomph" into this cause. We would at least have been much farther along toward solving this crisis after almost seven years. Who can say? Nevertheless, this latest and most magnificent accolade is all the sweeter because it's OUR win, as well.

Invariably during the coverage of the Nobel Peace Prize announcement, print and broadcast reporters, anchors, and pundits described it as a vindication of the stolen election that allowed Bush to slither into Gore's rightful seat behind the Resolute Desk. It's long past time the media widely acknowledged that particular "inconvenient truth." Broad-based public verification of it SHOULD be commonplace by now. Yes, you can indeed say Gore has been vindicated. So have those of us in the majority of voters who marked our ballots for him originally. We were correct all along about him. We knew back then that he was by far the better man. That he's been named the newest Nobel Laureate now signals that everybody else across the globe knows it, too.

"One can generate a lot of heartburn thinking about all of the things that would be better about this country and the world if the Supreme Court had done the right thing and ruled for Al Gore instead of George W. Bush in 2000."
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/13/opinion/13sat1.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

Heartburn indeed. I wake up with it every morning, thinking about what might have been if we had a Gore presidency instead of the nightmare under which we've shuddered for most of this decade. Paul Krugman correctly points out that the wrong-wing has knee-jerk apoplexy over Al Gore - mainly because, unlike him, they and theirs have been wrong about everything that counts.

"The worst thing about Mr. Gore, from the conservative point of view, is that he keeps being right. In 1992, George H. W. Bush mocked him as the 'ozone man,' but three years later the scientists who discovered the threat to the ozone layer won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry. In 2002 he warned that if we invaded Iraq, 'the resulting chaos could easily pose a far greater danger to the United States than we presently face from Saddam.' And so it has proved."
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/15/opinion/15krugman.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

The OTHER worst thing about Gore from the CONservative point of view, I think, is how he always seems to be on the side of good the common good. You can't say that about their standard-bearer.

Stack 'em up side-by-side, all you "you're-with-us-or-you're-ag'in'-us folks: Al Gore, WHO REALLY WON IN 2000, now has a Nobel Peace Prize and the admiration of the ENTIRE WORLD. The highly-coveted medallion will go up on Gore's family room mantle next to the testimonials for his OSCAR-winning documentary, his EMMY, and his citations as best-selling author (and not merely for bulk-buys, either). George W. Bush is nothing more than an overgrown schoolyard bully who doesn't (and can't) EVER do anything else but go around lying, cheating, flouting the law, menacing everyone, wrecking everything he touches, and picking fights with people all over the world. Gore is about life, survival, peace, hope, truth, selflessness, courage, knowledge, and nobility. Junior on the other hand is about death, destruction, greed, misery, lies, cowardice, willful ignorance, terror, and torture.

Gore was about going to Vietnam. Bush enjoyed strings being pulled so he could hide within the safety of a questionable stint with the Texas Air National Guard. They were both sons of privilege and connections, certainly, but Gore went about earning his own way through his own hard work. Bush only mouths the term "hard work" while coasting on the coattails of his father's accomplishments and connections, with scheming minions both inside and outside his "government" who do his hardest dirty work for him. Gore has taken a personal blow and built something utterly magnificent and quite literally planet-saving in the past seven years. There is no way in Hell that you can make the same claim about Young George. Is there any question (aside those from the lost souls who choose to remain blind, deafened, and fooled) which of these is the better man?

The behavior pattern of the bad guys is very predictable. They typically try, and try VERY hard, to rain on our parade however they can, sometimes with malice aforethought.

http://mediamatters.org/items/200710160001?src=item200710160001

1 | 2

no website yet

Mary Lyon is a veteran broadcaster ad five-time Golden Mike Award winner, who has anchored, reported, and written for the Associated Press Radio Network, NBC Radio "The Source," and many Los Angeles-area stations including KRTH-FM/AM, (more...)

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author

Contact Editor

View Authors' Articles

Book Recommendations for "2000 Election Bush"

2000 Presidential Election: Bush v. Gore Florida Election Cases--Complete Supreme Court Coverage (CD-ROM)
by U.S. Government

$19.95

Number of pages: 85401
Publisher: Progressive Management

Bush's Presidential Election 2000: Candidates, Conventions, Campaigns and Comments
by Ph.D., Robert R. Morman

$25.50
Lowest New Price $15.80
Number of pages: 388
Publisher: 1st Books Library