By Dr. Linda Seger, Author, Jesus Rode a Donkey: Why the Republicans Don't have a Corner on Christ
I sometimes wonder when Liberation Theology became a dirty word. As the media has continued to harp on Obama's relationship with his minister, who obviously has done him much good, the topic continually comes up "" Wright preaches liberation theology. How awful!
But any Christian who reads their Bible will discover that Jesus' first mission statement was to liberate. If someone wanted to know what he was about, they only have to read Luke 4 where Jesus clarified his mission: "The spirit of the Lord is on me, for he has anointed me to bring the good news to the afflicted. He has sent me to proclaim liberty to the captives, sight to the blind, to let the oppressed go free"-"-
Those who preach liberation theology don't play it safe. There is no quiet, calm, soft little comfort zones for the Christian to simply relax into a meek message. Christians who take these words seriously know that Jesus had serious work to do. He confronted the establishment "" especially the religious establishment for not caring enough about the poor and the needy, for oppressing others, for causing others to suffer.
This is not simply a Christian message, but a prophetic message that can be traced to the prophets in the Old Testament who railed and harangued against the injustices of the day.
Some African-American churches fit well into this tradition. Obama explained it well "" about how the African-American Church has a different style and many whites don't understand it.
The prophetic voice is not always pretty. We wouldn't want to be friends with Isaiah or Jeremiah or Amos or Micah because they were much too much in-your-face with their messages. They wanted to jolt the people. They wanted to change "" not just hearts and minds but change a society.
There are over 500 verses in the Bible that speak to nations and rulers "" not just to individuals. They call on nations to be just, merciful. They tell them "woe to you who create unjust legislation."- (Isaiah 10). Yet, for many conservative Christians, they want their leaders to be Christian in terms of their belief systems, but not Christians in terms of truly changing society by helping those who suffer, who are oppressed, who are afflicted and brokenhearted.
Of course, some of these sermons and preachers get out of hand. They cross a few lines. According to Obama, Wright crossed a few boundaries in the sermons broadcast, ad nauseum, over television in the last few weeks.
Yet, if anyone is honest, they would recognize that America has not been totally innocent "" not in this war, not in the way we have treated our citizens. We deserve a bit of haranguing as a nation. It is time for a few changes in the ways we handle many things-- rendition, torture, taking away the rights of citizens, those who go hungry, those who die because they don't have health care, those who suffer because of many policies, the way we've conducted the war in Iraq.
Obama clarified where he thought that Pastor Wright had gone too far, and also clarified those boundaries that some pastors cross. He couldn't disavow what Pastor Wright had done for him. He had no reason to leave the church, since Wright had already left it by retiring. But he wisely differentiated those fine lines. He nuanced, and as many of us might remember, we haven't seen nuance for 7 years because Bush has said he doesn't nuance. But we are in great need of some nuancing these days.
Notice, that no one is talking about McCain's spiritual advisors. Rev. Rod Parsley in Ohio calls on the U.S. to wage war against Iran, and compares Planned Parenthood to the Klu Klux Klan. Rev. John Hagee in Texas calls for a military strike against Iran, called the Catholic Church anti-Christ and "The Great Whore"- and says that Jews have brought persecution upon themselves. Yet, McCain doesn't denounce them. Compare the two. Do we prefer a spiritual advisor (now retired) who asks us to be merciful and just? Or do we prefer a President who has spiritual advisors who are filled with hatred, divisive, and pushing us toward more wars?
Obama, in a wise and perceptive way, used this controversy as a jumping off place to talk about some of the most difficult topics. He showed he knew how to include not exclude. He showed he knew how to unify, not divide. He showed compassion, understanding, discernment. And where did he learn this way of perceiving? Much of it was learned in this church. It would be good if Citizens could do a bit more reading before casting the first stone.
http://www/jesusrodeadonkey-thebook.com
Linda is the author of JESUS RODE A DONKEY: Why the Republicans Don't Have a Corner on Christ, which looks at Christian values from the viewpoint of the Democratic Party. She is the granddaughter of a Lutheran minister, and a member of the Society of Friends (Quakers). She holds an M.A. in Religion and the Arts from Pacific School of Religion, Berkeley, California, a ThD in Religion and the Arts from The Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley, California, and an M.A. in Feminist Theology from Immaculate Heart College Center, Los Angeles, California.
I, at least, remember those times as a chance to produce change. At the time I worked for a company where 95% of the employees were black. In the computer department we were somewhat desegregated. Somewhat, because there were Negro programmers and lead operators, while the preponderance were still white.
One operator, helpful to me as I tried to test new programs before the full crew arrived, was articulate on tumultous times in Chicago. He asked if I thought all people were created equal. I replied that yes, but what counted after birth was how opportunities were equal. He complained about white churches and their prejudice. It was summer and we had substitute pastors on Sunday. Gordon Gilkey (Harvard Ph.D and member of UC of C) was slated for the next week. So I invited him and his wife to come for dinner after the four of us attended North Berwyn Congregational Church. Although we were buffered from Chicago borders by Cicero (verifiably one of the most segregated suburbs in Cook County history) our suburb was also lily white.
Who was there and how it worked is not why I comment. Hot as issues were in those days, all persons showed their Christian upbringing at church. I comment because of the sermon's message. Dr. Gilkey had forsaken his usual calling to become vice-president of community outreach for a department store in the Loop. He laid out a view of the future, when other peoples of the world would have a chance to enjoy the bounty as we have done. And he told us that we needed to participate in what Jesus would have us do.
Our minister came back from vacation and we continued to do work with CALC and COCU, knowing that Ken Smith on the South Side was doing the same thing at Trinity Church of Christ. More hopeful than realistic, we participated in Interracial Fellowship meetings with those from our Ecumenical group. One of the nicest afternoons I recall from those days was going to the South Side to a Lutheran church, where Dick Gregory laid it on the line for us.
I think of the chaplain at Harvard (Is his name Comes?) who recently said that WWJD is the wrong message. It should be "what would Jesus have me do?) Now that Dr. Thomas at headquarters UC of C has the situation well in hand over the federal lawsuit, it seems like we have arrived at the same place we were 40 years ago.
Thank you for your article.
by
Margaret Bassett (33 articles, 2015 quicklinks, 30 diaries, 1345 comments)
on Saturday, April 5, 2008 at 9:46:57 AM
Rev. Wright is right for all of us. We should all listen to people like Rev. Wright. They are right. Why wouldn't we want to be a member of their congregation.
by
sbaker (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 137 comments)
on Saturday, April 5, 2008 at 10:49:14 AM
The USA is probably 95% Christian, they attend church regularly and no doubt recite the ten commandments ad lib but WHY are these same Christians supporting a vast military, the same military which has caused the death of millions, who have torture prisons all over the world. Don't answer, all foriegners are evil, right. Robertson called for the assasination of Chavez and calls Iran the enemy, just like most of the christians do. If there is a god, and I don't believe for a second there is, then why does he tolerate such behaviour.
Religious nutcases like the author are to blame for most of the evil in this world, you don't believe me then read about the Spanish inquisition, or more recently the invasion of Iraq and Afgahnistan. Tell me how a christian country can carry out a crime of this magnitude.
by
douglas kay (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 83 comments)
on Sunday, April 6, 2008 at 9:24:48 AM
4 comments
How would you rate this?
You must be logged in (if signed up) to do ratings.
It's free to signup! And easy. And takes just a minute or two....
Must Read (
Well Said (
News (
Touching (
Funny (
Supported (
Interesting (
Inspiring (
Valuable (
