Tags for This Article:

Impeachment (3159)  Bush Admin (1984)  Iraq (1082)  Investigations (931)  People Dick Cheney (556)  Pelosi-Nancy (452)  People Cindy Sheehan (44) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
April 25, 2008 at 21:51:44

Headlined on 4/25/08:
Pelosi HEARTS Bush!

by Linda Milazzo

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

Thank you, Larry King.   When you bring it, YOU BRING IT!   And last night, YOU BROUGHT IT!!   Thanks to the few simple questions you asked Speaker Pelosi, viewers got a clearer insight into who Speaker Pelosi is and how Speaker Pelosi feels - about President Bush, about her self-described "day job," and about her Congressional opponent, Cindy Sheehan.  
 
So how does Speaker Pelosi feel about President Bush?  She likes him!   She genuinely likes him.   According to Pelosi, there's nothing "personal" for her in the decisions and policies of George W. Bush.  Why should it be personal?   Nothing the President has done regarding the war has personally affected Mrs. Pelosi or her family.  No Pelosis have been killed in Iraq, lost limbs, suffered traumatic brain injury, or committed suicide after returning home.  And since Mrs. Pelosi dislikes the war, or so she proclaims, no young Pelosi will be prompted to fight it.   So for Speaker Pelosi, the Iraq war, with its non-Pelosi casualties, will remain non-personal – and her relationship with its creator, George W. Bush, won't be soured by her pain.
 
Still shouldn't the war be more "personal" for Speaker Pelosi - and her feelings for its creator reflect the dislike she feels toward his war?   Isn't she mandated by her day job (as she calls her Speakership) and her Constitutional Oath to monitor impropriety and hold those accountable who do wrong?  
 
Like Pelosi, I too, have a day job, and colleagues with whom I disagree.  Where I diverge from Pelosi in my relationships with my colleagues is if one committed an act that purposefully harmed another, IT WOULD BE VERY PERSONAL FOR ME!  I would do everything possible to bring my colleague to justice – without sweeping Congressional powers or a Constitutional mandate to spur me on.  George Bush's policies have resulted in monumental harm and horror, yet his Madam Speaker colleague speaks fondly of him with a smile.  That's a filth I could never roll in.  The strongest lye wouldn't scrub me clean.  
 
Throughout my life I have NEVER been a conspiracist.  I demand much investigation before accepting a fact, but Pelosi's steadfast protection of Bush renders me ever more suspicious.  She removed all threats to Bush's office when she ascended to her own.  Impeachment, a Constitutional staple which should always be in play, was instantly "off the table."  In its stead were place settings and a candelabra – nourishing loyalty, starving our democracy.   Mrs. Pelosi pays more attention to breaking bread than breaking rules.  She prefers celebrations with the President (like the DeBakey event she describes to Larry King), to investigations of the President - which is what this nation needs.  
 
As the President's term draws closer to an end, calls for his impeachment wither, and Pelosi is further off the hook.  But my impeachment juices were rallied last night by Pelosi's acceptance of this architect of death.  
 
Seeing her effortlessly rattle off these Bush derelictions, Pelosi underscores the rationale for hearings: "he's taken us into war, that he's taken us into debt, that he's taken us into recession, loss of life, reputation... the [in]capability of our military to protect America's interests wherever it's sent... missed opportunity on energy independence and reversing global warming...,"  but she always blocks their way.  It makes one wonder – it makes ME wonder -- why Mrs. Pelosi was so quickly persuaded to let Bush serve his full term?  Mass murder aside, lying aside, torture aside, illegal surveillance aside, co-opting "Justice" aside, Speaker Pelosi likes him!!  HOW CAN YOU LIKE A MASS MURDERER?!
 
Here is the conversation (in video and text) between Speaker Pelosi and Mr. King:
  
 
King:     What's it like to work with the President?
 
Pelosi:    The President and I have a fine relationship, I think.
 
King:       Do you like him?
 
Pelosi:     Personally, yes.  It's not anything personal.   I just don't like his policies.    I think that he's taken us into war, that he's taken us into debt, that he's taken us into recession, loss of life, reputation, [unintelligible], the capability of our military to protect America's interests wherever it's sent.   It's huge.   I think missed opportunity on energy independence and reversing global warming is a missed opportunity.   There's so much we could have done but it's just a matter of months and we'll be able to do it.
 
King:      My late friend Tip O'Neill told me he argued frequently with President Reagan but never with animosity.
 
Pelosi:     No.
 
King:       Do you [and the President] argue?
 
Pelosi:      Yes, but I think he understands, as do I.   He has to do what he has to do and I have to do what I have to do.   And I have to try and find common ground and then stand my ground – the ground for the Congress when we don't find that.   But President was here yesterday [huge smile].   We gave the Congressional Gold Medal to Michael DeBakey [renowned heart surgeon].   Can you just imagine 99 years old?
 
King:        Amazing.
 
Pelosi:      We had a very amiable conversation.   It's not personal.   And you know the President is not that kind of a person.   He's not a bitter kind of a person so – and I certainly respect our differences of opinion and I have very serious differences of opinion with the President.
 
 
There's that "bitter" word again.   I just wonder what George W. Bush could possibly be bitter about -  that his mountain bike got scratched - or that Jeb outgrew his big brother?   What the hell does this Speaker believe has not served this indulgent addict turned war criminal's needs?   She's never let him down.
 
And now another big thanks to Larry King in his interview with Speaker Pelosi last night - for breaking corporate media's silence on Cindy Sheehan's campaign.   Obviously there are huge differences between Pelosi and Sheehan.  Pelosi is corporate roots.  Sheehan is grassroots.  Pelosi has green.  Sheehan is green.  Pelosi ignores the Constitution.  Sheehan adores the Constitution.  But the most glaring difference, as evidenced by the conversation above, is that for Pelosi this war is NOT personal, but for Sheehan it's PERSONAL IN EVERY WAY.  Sheehan lost her son in the war on Iraq.  Sad that Speaker Pelosi, who has a son of her own, was so dismissive of Sheehan's candidacy last night.  
 
Cindy Sheehan first became famous when she begged George W. Bush to tell her "for what noble cause my son [Casey] died," but Mr. "Not Bitter" refused.   George W. Bush, the man Speaker Pelosi shields from investigation, ignored the mother of a soldier who was killed.   Yet Speaker Pelosi likes him!  
 
Tell me, who should be in Congress in San Francisco – the protector and enabler of war criminals, or the person who battles the criminals and their war?
 
Here's the conversation between Speaker Pelosi and Larry King (in video and text) that breaks the ban on corporate media's refusal to cover Cindy Sheehan's campaign.   Thanks again to Larry King for addressing the campaign and for asking Speaker Pelosi if she'd debate Cindy Sheehan -  a spectacularly democratic idea. 
   
King:      You mentioned Iraq.   I guess the most famous anti-war activist, Cindy Sheehan, is gonna run         against you.
 
Pelosi:      Yes.
 
King:        In the Democratic Primary?
 
Pelosi:       No, as an Independent, I think.
 
King:        She's running as a [unintelligible].   How would you... would you debate her?   How do you              view that?   I guess you share her views, don't you?   
 
Pelosi:       Yeah, yes, well, god bless her.   I think it's a reflection of the dissatisfaction the people have that we have not been able to end war – but we were hoping that the President would have more – pay more attention to wishes that the American people - not turn a tin ear them to them and a blind eye to what's actually happening in Iraq.  But god bless her for her advocacy.   Cindy Sheehan lost her son in Iraq and so she has all of my sympathy, respect for her sacrifice her family has made.
 
King:    Surprised she picked you to run against?
 
Pelosi:  I don't even think about it.  You know I have a day job...
 
 
Yes, Madam Speaker, you do have a "day job."   And your job description comes straight from the Constitution.   Rather than continuing to protect and enable George Bush, Dick Cheney, and the rest of their cabal, why not abide by Article I Section 2 of the Constitution and initiate investigations of their acts?   And how about debating Cindy Sheehan?   It's time to take your job personally, Mrs. Pelosi.  The world is crumbling under your watch. 

How 'bout HEARTING the Constitution rather than those who have torn it apart?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Linda Milazzo is a Los Angeles based writer, educator and activist. Since 1974, she has divided her time between the entertainment industry, government organizations & community development projects and educational programs. Linda began her writing career over 30 years ago, starting out in advertising and promotions. From 1976 to 1989, she operated an independent public relations service providing specialty writing for individual and corporate clients. For the past six years, Linda has focused on political writing. Her essays, letters and commentaries have appeared in domestic and international journals, newspapers, magazines and on dozens of respected news and opinion websites. She's an educator and creator of a writers' program she's taught privately and in public schools. She currently facilitates an advocacy writing workshop and is developing an advocacy writing program to be implemented in public and private educational institutions and in community based organizations. A political and social activist since the Vietnam War, Linda attributes her revitalized-fully-engaged-intense-head-on-non-stop-political activism to the UNFORTUNATE EXISTENCE OF GEORGE W. BUSH and her disgust with greed-ridden American imperialism, environmental atrocities, egregious war, nuclear proliferation, lying leaders, and global tyranny!

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
14 comments

Very involved in 9/11 truth and in helping to seek a new investigation into the events of that day.
PixieVery involved in 9/11 truth and in helping to seek a new investigation into the events of that day.

What the heck?

"I think it's a reflection of the dissatisfaction the people have that we have not been able to end war – but we were hoping that the President would have more – pay more attention to wishes that the American people - not turn a tin ear them to them and a blind eye to what's actually happening in Iraq"

Yeah, kinda like we hoped Congress wouldn't ignore the wishes of the people and turn a blind eye to what's happened in Iraq.  The woman is certifiable.  What does she think her day job is?  To do as the President says?

Nevermind .... I just answered my own question.

by Pixie (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 45 comments) on Saturday, April 26, 2008 at 6:36:50 AM
 


Midwesterner, veteran of VietNam era naval service, I still feel an obligation to defend the Constitution against "all enemies, foreign and domestic."
John Sanchez Jr.Midwesterner, veteran of VietNam era naval service, I still feel an obligation to defend the Constitution against "all enemies, foreign and domestic."

My friend, George, says...

that it's just a "Goddamned scrap of paper." He may have misspoke, I believe it's actually just a goddamned scrap of parchment. Glad to straighten that out for you.

Smooches,

Nancy

by John Sanchez Jr. (5 articles, 0 quicklinks, 12 diaries, 1175 comments) on Saturday, April 26, 2008 at 7:14:48 AM
 


Currently I'm a cartoonist and contributing writer for The New Orleans Levee. For those wishing to view my work you can see my latest at: nolvee.com
Mr MCurrently I'm a cartoonist and contributing writer for The New Orleans Levee. For those wishing to view my work you can see my latest at: nolvee.com

It's all about her ...

"I" this and "I" that and to hell what The People want that she's supposed to represent. In every single way this women reeks of elitism. If there was anyone that deserves a pie-in-the-face it's this condescending bitch.

by Mr M (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 12 diaries, 1436 comments) on Saturday, April 26, 2008 at 8:00:20 AM
 


56 years on this jumpin' green sphere. Musician. Own and operate a music store to help kids find a possible life long friend. I believe in the soul and the search. Happily married w/ 2 boys. Published songwriter. play bass, piano and gut string guitar. there are no solutions..only alternatives. Ask questions. Listen. Be fair and don't expect. Baseball is a mirror. Don't ask....unless you have time and a sense of humor. Peace is never easy, but worth it. Always.
mikel paul56 years on this jumpin' green sphere. Musician. Own and operate a music store to help kids find a possible life long friend. I believe in the soul and the search. Happily married w/ 2 boys. Published songwriter. play bass, piano and gut string guitar. there are no solutions..only alternatives. Ask questions. Listen. Be fair and don't expect. Baseball is a mirror. Don't ask....unless you have time and a sense of humor. Peace is never easy, but worth it. Always.

Who are these employees?

     Mr M...CONDESENDING b****? To be or not to be......

     Miss Nancy....Here's your job. Representing your constituants. The ones who voted you into your position. It looks like about 80% of your constituants want you to end the war. And yes madam speaker, you have the duty to hold the president accountable for his actions. It is not your 'choices' or your 'opinions' that you are to follow. You see, we have this document that was written in hopes that no one, not you, not the president, nor any judicial member, could make singular decisions without the others approval and/or oversight. It's called checks and balances, a wonderfully simple philosophy that protects the 'people' whom this document defines as the real government. You derive your postion 'from' them. You are the representative government. After your time in office is completed and you return to the land of 'citizen' it is considered a 'promotion'. You may want to recall how Harry Truman scolded a young jouranalist who asked him what it felt like to not be president anymore. He understood this. Anyway, you have lots to do. It is a full time job. I heard you lightly called it a day job. I hope you don't believe that. It may get you into trouble. Also, before you go, there will always be someone else who thinks they can do a better job than you. It comes with the territory. Don't be surprised if you are surprised by this. It's funny how it works. You're a lucky person to be given this honor. It isn't rocket science. Quite simply you are a guard. To protect and defend is a good way to see it. At some point when you are at the close of your time on this earth you will have much to look back on. Your family and the purpose of your life will be your legacy. I trust you see what my point is. You still have a chance to NOT be what Mr. M suggests you are. Yes, I understand it is difficult. There is a lot of pressure to believe you are the source. We all have that issue in some form, at some time. Lastly, let me just say that if you feel the people who elected you don't really understand well enough what pressures you are under, I would suggest from time to time you ask them what they think. Kind of like how you were raised perhaps when your parents considered what your feelings were about things. Caring for others is the best place to start. Over and over I might add. Now go prove Mr. M and me wrong. You'll die happy. Otherwise, you'll just be gone and I don't think many like that idea.

     Good luck.

     peace    

by mikel paul (10 articles, 1 quicklinks, 7 diaries, 396 comments) on Saturday, April 26, 2008 at 10:45:36 AM
 


Nathan Nahm is a retired New York lawyer, with a strong interest in issues relating to individual ethics, individual liberty, human rights, peace and war, economic fairness and social justice.
Nathan NahmNathan Nahm is a retired New York lawyer, with a strong interest in issues relating to individual ethics, individual liberty, human rights, peace and war, economic fairness and social justice.

Doesn't the Democratic Party always do that?

Right on!  A further proof, if any is needed, that the main job of the Democratic Party is to enable the Republicans do all the dirty work. 

by Nathan Nahm (7 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 62 comments) on Saturday, April 26, 2008 at 11:42:33 AM
 


Nathan Nahm is a retired New York lawyer, with a strong interest in issues relating to individual ethics, individual liberty, human rights, peace and war, economic fairness and social justice.
Nathan NahmNathan Nahm is a retired New York lawyer, with a strong interest in issues relating to individual ethics, individual liberty, human rights, peace and war, economic fairness and social justice.

In case you did not reallize already . . .

I think there are two main groups of Democratic voters: one group mistakenly believing that the Clinton candidacy will represent a change and another group who want a real change from the current state of affairs. 

by Nathan Nahm (7 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 62 comments) on Saturday, April 26, 2008 at 12:07:04 PM
 


Nathan Nahm is a retired New York lawyer, with a strong interest in issues relating to individual ethics, individual liberty, human rights, peace and war, economic fairness and social justice.
Nathan NahmNathan Nahm is a retired New York lawyer, with a strong interest in issues relating to individual ethics, individual liberty, human rights, peace and war, economic fairness and social justice.

"Doesn't the Democratic Party always do that?"

"Right on!  A further proof, if any is needed, that the main job of the Democratic Party is to enable the Republicans do all the dirty work."   I don't think my comment above is inappropriate in the least.  Many, if not most, people believe that the most serious problem with our current two-party system is that it is too much like a one-party system.   Nancy Pelosi case is but one such illustration behind a facade of an opposing party.  A more current example is the Clinton-McCain collusion to bash the Obama candidacy which they rightly fear may change the status quo.    

by Nathan Nahm (7 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 62 comments) on Saturday, April 26, 2008 at 11:57:11 AM
 


Dr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published over 45 scientific articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.
John R MoffettDr. John Moffett is an active research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area, who has published over 45 scientific articles on the nervous and immune systems. Dr. Moffett is also the author and webmaster of the political opinion website www.Factinista.org, and is a Managing Editor at OpEdNews.com.

Precisely.


Now what do you do about it? Unlike the weather, you can actually do more than just complain about politics. You can get involved.

Unless you want to run for local office, your only other real choice is to vote. Every two years you get a chance to do that. Unfortunately, I suppose you could say, so do all the people who completely disagree with you in this country. The Bushites, and “bitter people, who cling to guns and religion, and have antipathy towards those who are not like them”. Values-voters who care more about gay marriage than the Iraq war.

I say the first step in any long process of political reconstruction in the country starts with winning the White House and Congress back from the people who cater to that other half of the country. That means we need to start with a clean slate of Democrats controlling all three houses. Then we can work to get rid of the bad apples. If that includes Pelosi, then so be it. She has been a major obstructionist to moving forward with investigations for political reasons.

Because third-party activists have been completely unable to field a viable candidate, and always seem to wait till the last minute to even try starting to build a campaign around a candidate, (rather than starting well before any primary season begins) I don't see that ever happening due to their lack of organization.

by John R Moffett (80 articles, 14 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 610 comments) on Saturday, April 26, 2008 at 12:25:36 PM
 


Nathan Nahm is a retired New York lawyer, with a strong interest in issues relating to individual ethics, individual liberty, human rights, peace and war, economic fairness and social justice.
Nathan NahmNathan Nahm is a retired New York lawyer, with a strong interest in issues relating to individual ethics, individual liberty, human rights, peace and war, economic fairness and social justice.

Yes, I could not agree more.

Despite my complaint about the track records of the Democratic Party, I don't recommend that people vote for Nader, for example.  To show that we the people do not approve the illegal acts of the current administration, we must soundly defeat whoever is perceived to be the successor of this administration.  Otherwise, we will be formally approving everything that has been done during the last 8 years.  That means voting for a Democrat for President and voting for other good Democrats in all other Congressional elections.  But, one way or another, we must also send a clear message of displeasure to the democrats who have not stood up against the abuses during the last 8 years. 

by Nathan Nahm (7 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 62 comments) on Sunday, April 27, 2008 at 2:43:53 AM
 


I do not feel it necessary for me to give you a bio..this is not High School
Susan NelsenI do not feel it necessary for me to give you a bio..this is not High School

Now..Here is a real..

elitist bitch,  Nancy Pelosi...quite your damn day job...you obviously don't take it very seriously, any way..and we the people would be far, far better off with out you sitting in judgement

by Susan Nelsen (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 268 comments) on Saturday, April 26, 2008 at 2:50:28 PM
 


My Blog,  The Cosmic Message Publishes Progressive Commentary About Current Political Events.  I've Been Writing Editorial Columns Online Since 1999 And My Archives Are Available For Public Review Since 2004. My work has appeared previously at Op/Ed News, Buzzflash and Mark Fiore Animations.
Stop By Today And Post A Comment About My Latest Topic.

CosmicMy Blog,  The Cosmic Message Publishes Progressive Commentary About Current Political Events.  I've Been Writing Editorial Columns Online Since 1999 And My Archives Are Available For Public Review Since 2004. My work has appeared previously at Op/Ed News, Buzzflash and Mark Fiore Animations.
Stop By Today And Post A Comment About My Latest Topic.

Your Post

Hi Linda ... thanks for posting this. 

Although I don't consider Larry King to be in the same league as Bill Moyer when it comes to credibe journalists the "You Tube" video posted here was encouraging. 

He asked the relevant questions that Pelosi and the DLC have been avoiding since the mid-term elections and which the debate moderators have dutifully neglected.

All are trying to parlay this election into maintaining the "status quo" without making the corporate elite accountable for morally and fiscally bankrupting our nation.

Peace,

Cosmic 

 

by Cosmic (13 articles, 0 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 6 comments) on Saturday, April 26, 2008 at 5:57:17 PM
 


Jennifer Epps is an anti-war protester, feminist, environmentalist, and activist with the L.A. Area Impeachment Center. She is also a screenwriter, stage director, and former film critic.
Jennifer EppsJennifer Epps is an anti-war protester, feminist, environmentalist, and activist with the L.A. Area Impeachment Center. She is also a screenwriter, stage director, and former film critic.

Insight into Pelosi

Thanks very much for writing this piece and posting those clips of Pelosi's responses. Very interesting how she tries to pass the buck! She wants to criticize Bush just enough for Dems to be satisfied yet still try to please Republicans. What a bunch of tomfoolery even showing up to her 'day job', what a waste of taxpayer money for them to debate and pass bills, when they let Bush break the law over and over with impunity and deliberately ignore over 1100 of the laws Congress has passed during his presidency!

by Jennifer Epps (4 articles, 1 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 19 comments) on Sunday, April 27, 2008 at 8:10:20 PM