Tags for This Article:

Bush Crimes (1263)  Lies Bush (1109)  Bush Enemy Of Democracy (1016)  Bush Liar-in-Chief (861)  Bush Co-Conspirators (682)  Bush Reasons To Prosecute (667)  Lies Republican (533)  Lies Neocon (518)  Lies Cheney (465)  Bush Torturer-in-Chief (401)  Lies- Pentagon (230)  Lies Rumsfeld (149)  Lies Justice Dept (131)  Lies State Dept (109) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
April 3, 2008 at 08:16:16

Headlined on 4/3/08:
Bush Lies About 911: A Primer

by Len Hart     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com


Tell A Friend

As FBI Director Robert Mueller had said, there is no evidence to connect the 'said' 19 'hijackers' with the events of 911. That's 'no' as in 'none', 'nada' and 'zip'! Those who assert must prove. Bush asserted a theory in which the 19 hijackers crashed US buildlings an all died. Show me the bodies! Show me a valid and verifiable autopsy report.

 

Show me the evidence! FBI Director Robert Mueller had said that there was none no evidence connecting the 19 'said' hijackers with 911. He was right about that if he was wrong about almost everything else.

 

While there is NO verifiable evidence to support the absurd Bush version of this capital crime of mass murder, there is, however, probable cause to indict George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and Condoleeza Rice for the crimes of mass murder and treason. Let Cheney give his side of the story --under oath --to a federal grand jury! My critics should not complain if there is no evidence in support of the Bush/Cheney fairy tale! The evidence that might have exonerated the Bush/Cheney gang --if there ever was any --has all been destroyed upon orders from the Bush administration.

 

Certainly, Bushco opposed the creation of the 911 Commission, having already ordered the destruction of evidence at the Pentagon and 'ground zero'. Since, Bush interfered with the work of the 911 Commission.

These are not the actions of an innocent man. Had Bush wanted the truth out, he would have supported a complete, fair, and impartial investigation. But he did not! We must, therefore, conclude that he did not want a complete, fair, and impartial investigation. And, if Bush did not want a complete, fair, and impartial investigation, then there is every valid reason to suspect that it is his own guilt and complicity that he actively seeks to hide.

A single body might have gone along way in supporting Bush. The identified and autopsied body of Hani Hanjour, for example, might have supported the Bush/Cheney theory that Hani piloted an aircraft that he most certainly could never have piloted. Some physical evidence might have overcome serious objections, but --alas --there are no bodies! There are no hijacker names on the pathologists report. There is no evidence that Hanjour's remains were buried/ There is no evidence that Hani Hanjour was ever on any of the Flights in Question! The Washington Post even reported that Hanjour was not on Flight 77 because he did not have a ticket. It's hard to imagine Hanjour forcing his way on board and, after having done so, taking off at the controls! I just don't think that ever happened. Bush's 'official theory' is full of holes.

 

It's not enough that the Bush administration actively covered up evidence even as it sought to quash every attempt to investigate 911, Bush and Condoleeza Rice would lie about the event after the fact, specifically, both Bush and Condo stated that the crashing of airliners into buildings could not have been foresee, were not foreseen. [Bush: No evidence that US could avoid 9/11] Bush lied! And so did Condo Rice:
Today's Sydney Morning Herald prints an extract from Shenon's book which provides further details about Rice's incompetence. "Emails from the National Security Council's counter-terrorism director, Richard Clarke, showed that he had bombarded Rice with messages about terrorist threats" before 9/11, Shenon writes.
In fact, just such a 'scenario' was the basis for security when Bush attended the G8 Summit in Italy, July 23, 2001 [See: "Italy: Bush Targeted at G8." New York Newsday 19 Sept 2001, unsigned; "Extremists 'Planned Genoa Attack on Bush'", BBC News, 27 Sept 2001]. Secondly, Dick Cheney supervised precisely that scenario on the very day that it happened in fact --a highly improbable coincidence' that would repeat later in Britain on 7/7. Cheney supervised what are called 'exercises' within a bunker --the Presidential Emergency Operations Center --located under the White House. There is damning testimony against Cheney from former Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta who contradicts 9/11 Commission Report's Account of Dick Cheney's timetable.

 

The Probable Cause to Charge Dick Cheney With Mass Murder, Terrorism, and High Treason

 

That's not all. Cheney had already been put in charge of a 'domestic terrorism study group' [See: 911 Coincidences], a clever cover from which to commit high treason and mass murder.

 

Since those events, the Bush administration has worked overtly, assiduously to quash and interfere with every effort to investigate fully the events of 911.

 

# Scot J. Paltrow, "Government Accounts of 9/11 Reveal Gaps, Inconsistencies. Questions Arise About Who Put Nation on High Alert; A Threat to Air Force One? Panel Assembles Timeline," --Wall Street Journal, March 22, 2004.

 

Condoleezza Rice, "9/11: For The Record," Washington Times, March 22, 2004: "Despite what some have suggested, we received no intelligence that terrorists were preparing to attack the homeland using airplanes as missiles, though some analysts speculated that terrorists might hijack airplanes to try to free US-held terrorists." Also see "Promoting Icon Condi" in the August 4, 2003, Daily Howler.

 

--National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States - SourceWatch
Rice's statements were bald faced lies.

 

Only the guilty try to cover up their crimes.
If the 9/11 attacks were orchestrated or at least deliberately allowed by the Bush- Cheney administration and the Pentagon, then the motivation to cover up this murderous and treasonous act would be unlimited. No expenditure of time and money would be considered too great."

 

--Professor David Ray Griffin [4], The True Story of 9/11: Part IV
The Bush administration and accomplices in other government offices would have you believe an absurd coincidence theory that on the very day, the very moment that Dick Cheney was supervising an exercise in which terrorists would attack the Pentagon and WTC, a rag tag gang of 'terrorists' would do precisely that!

 

Our 'government' thus declared war on the people of the United States and wages it! As Che would have put it: the peace is already considered to be broken. Thomas Jefferson would have already declared 'our' independence of a cabal that has, in effect, already destroyed the 'legitimate' government of the United States.
Section 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.

 

 1  |  2

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Demand A Federal Grand Jury Investigate Bush for the cover up of 911

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

http://existentialistcowboy.blogspot.com/

Len Hart is a Houston based film/video producer specializing in shorts and full-length documentaries. He is a former major market and network correspondent; credits include CBS, ABC-TV and UPI. He maintains the progressive blog: The Existentialist Cowboy

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Spurl      Tag!RawSugar      Shadows Tag!      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
28 comments

Len Hart is a Houston based film/video producer specializing in shorts and full-length documentaries. He is a former major market and network correspondent; credits include CBS, ABC-TV and UPI. He maintains the progressive blog: The Existentialist Cowboy
Len HartLen Hart is a Houston based film/video producer specializing in shorts and full-length documentaries. He is a former major market and network correspondent; credits include CBS, ABC-TV and UPI. He maintains the progressive blog: The Existentialist Cowboy

FATAL INCONSISTENCIES IN BUSH'S OFFICIAL THEORY

A review of "9/11 Contradictions: An Open Letter to Congress and the Press," by Dr. David Ray Griffin. Interlink Publishing, March 2008. 368 p. List

At last there is a book about 9/11 that politicians and journalists can openly discuss without fear of being labeled "conspiracy theorists".

9/11 Contradictions advances no theories. It simply exposes 25 astonishing internal contradictions that will haunt the public story of this unparalleled event for all time.

Until now, the persistent and disturbing questions about the day that changed the world have confused and alienated journalists and politicians, because:

  • The technical issues regarding the collapse of the towers, the failure of the military to intercept the flights, and the relatively minor damage to the Pentagon have been considered too complex for analysis in the media.
  • However, Griffin's new book requires no technical expertise from the reader, because each readable chapter revolves around one simple internal contradiction inherent in the public story. "If Jones says 'P' and Smith says 'Not P', we can all recognize that something must be wrong, because both statements cannot be true."
  • Many who have doubted the official story have offered alternative theories which have been dismissed as "conspiracy theories" by a press which must understandably place a high value on its credibility.
  • However, this book offers no alternative theories to explain the contradictions within the public story. It simply presents the glaring contradictions that have never been probed by Congress or the media, and beseeches members of these institutions come to grips with the reality and lead the charge for a truly independent investigation.

  • The 9/11 issue is six years old, journalists are busy people, and the world has moved on.
Though six years have passed, this matter is by no means closed, nor is the trail cold. "The accepted story about 9/11 has been used to increase military spending, justify wars, restrict civil liberties, and exalt the executive branch of the government." Indeed, this reviewer notes, the public story has recently been challenged in foreign forums (Japan Parliament, January 10, 2008, and at the European Parliament building in Brussels, February 26, 2008). The 9/11 Commissioners themselves have cast doubt on the credibility of the Commission Report in their January 2, 2008 New York Times article, "Stonewalled by the CIA." (Ref. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/02/opinion/02kean.html)

Let us now turn to the contradictions. But first, to quote Professor Griffin:

"Within the philosophy of science, there are two basic criteria for discriminating between good and bad theories. First, a theory should not be inconsistent with any of the relevant facts....Second, it must be self-consistent, devoid of any internal contradictions. If a theory contains an internal contradiction, it is an unacceptable theory."

Unacceptable, for example, is the following internal contradiction, quoted from the chapter summaries that have been helpfully provided at the end of the book interested investigative journalists and members of Congress:

With regard to the identity of the plane spotted over the White House around the time of the Pentagon strike: The military's denial that it was a military plane is contradicted by CNN footage of the plane's flight, which showed, as former military officers have agreed, that it was an Air Force E-4B.

[Reviewer's note: "The E-4B serves as the National Airborne Operations Center for the president, secretary of defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff or JCS." Cited from a current US Air Force factsheet at http://www.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?fsID=99.]

In his 2004 "The New Pearl Harbor", Griffin had already noted that the Standard Operating Procedures regarding flight interceptions had been inexplicably dropped on September 11th. This reviewer deduces that because a complex network of defense systems could not have been fully disabled without coordination from a senior military level, it was logical for Dr. Griffin to open the current volume by asking questions that the 9/11 Commission failed to ask: what were President Bush, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, and General Richard B. Myers, Acting Head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, doing that morning? In each case, inexplicable contradictions emerged in the reports of their whereabouts, and the same applied to Vice President Dick Cheney. None of these public officials were questioned under oath, and now it is abundantly clear that the contradictions surrounding them must be laid to rest in by a thorough and rigorous investigation.

In Part II, Griffin carefully tracks the disparities in the reported times at which the military was notified about the erratic behaviors of Flights 11, 175, 77, and 93. In each case, the striking contradictions he unearths are shown to require a serious investigation into how this over-arching failure actually did happen, and---this reviewer suggests---what connection it may have had to the unprecedented military air drills that were progressing throughout the attacks.

In Part III, probing questions regarding the pre-9/11 tastes and habits of the alleged hijackers are closely pursued through early press reports, with the confounding revelation that they had taken up Western sexual and drinking practices, and could certainly not be characterized as devout Muslims ready to meet their maker. The contradictions revealed in the investigation of cell phone and airphone reports of their actions on the planes is nothing short of brilliant, negating the entire phenomenon of the aggregate onboard myth.

Finally, Part IV deals with the towers themselves, including advance knowledge of their collapses, and the extraordinary oral testimonies of dozens of firefighters who reported, for example, massive explosions in the sub-basements of the buildings: a 50-ton hydraulic press reduced to rubble; a 300-lb. steel door wrinkled up like a strip of aluminum foil.

It is interesting to note that Dr. Griffin has become a virtual one-man clearinghouse for the vast accumulation of research that has been done on this world-changing event. It now appears highly likely that his neutral approach to this impressive body of evidence will be the axe that finally splits the issue open. Each one of the 25 carefully researched contradictions represents a crumbling brick in the official facade that shields the world from the unknown underlying truth.

As a writer myself, and a retired professional librarian, it was an honour to critique and give bibliographic support for Dr. Griffin's chapters, and for the extensive research supplied in the footnotes. Throughout the process, I was able to witness first-hand the precise, methodical, and ethical standards to which he works. One can only hope that the exceptional quality and responsibility evident in his work will inspire people in Congress and the media (and indeed in all walks of life) to rise to his challenge to investigate this pivotal international issue.

Global Research Articles by Elizabeth Woodworth

by Len Hart (119 articles, 153 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 454 comments) on Thursday, April 3, 2008 at 10:04:48 AM
 


Bia Winter is an Artist/Writer from Maine,
and has been an activist and letter-writer since the 60's.
In 2004 she received the Roger Baldwin Award from the Maine American Civil Liberties Union for furthering Democracy after she got a Resolution Against the USA"Patriot"Act passed in her small home town of Mount Vernon, by overwhelming show-of-hands vote at Town Meeting. She continues to Write, Activate and Cartoon for Progressive causes. Her Letters are often seen in the Baltimore Ch...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Bia WinterBia Winter is an Artist/Writer from Maine,
and has been an activist and letter-writer since the 60's.
In 2004 she received the Roger Baldwin Award from the Maine American Civil Liberties Union for furthering Democracy after she got a Resolution Against the USA"Patriot"Act passed in her small home town of Mount Vernon, by overwhelming show-of-hands vote at Town Meeting. She continues to Write, Activate and Cartoon for Progressive causes. Her Letters are often seen in the Baltimore Ch...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Like the Timeline..

Len, this "co-incidences" chronicle sounds like a good rational approach to unraveling the true story of 9/11,  Like the timeline of actual media coverage of this watershed "event" in  "9/11: Press for Truth ", where you can see these contradictions and "Co-incidences" for yourself.

This is also where the BBC reporter announced SEVEREL MINUTES BEFORE it happened that Building#7 had collapsed.  Not to mention, GW saying TWICE on TV  "When I saw the FIRST plane hit..."

by Bia Winter (1 articles, 2 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 170 comments) on Thursday, April 3, 2008 at 5:16:13 PM
 


Hater of Nazis above all. Hobbies include activism, military model building, military history, exciting and vital conversation with retired crooks. Retired
John HanksHater of Nazis above all. Hobbies include activism, military model building, military history, exciting and vital conversation with retired crooks. Retired

Democrats are the princes of denial.

911, 1968 Peace Talks, October Surprise, Florida, etc. etc. etc.  Don't let the Democrats be enablers again.

by John Hanks (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 859 comments) on Thursday, April 3, 2008 at 11:13:03 AM
 


I am  48 yearold gun totin redneck, tree huggin greenie lovin liberal. I have takin  on the mantel of personal responceability  to shout out the truth as I  see it. Right or wrong I will not go quitely into the night but instead kicking and screaming
Keith HuppI am  48 yearold gun totin redneck, tree huggin greenie lovin liberal. I have takin  on the mantel of personal responceability  to shout out the truth as I  see it. Right or wrong I will not go quitely into the night but instead kicking and screaming

bush lies


A Patriots Lament.
To all of our fallen heroes and loved ones we salute you on this Memorial day. Rest assured your sacrifices and those of your families will long be remembered. The pursuit of the criminals responsible for your wrongful deaths will continue until justice for these crimes is achieved. The struggle will be long and lot’s of hard work and sacrifice will be required. Our National Security is at risk. Our way of life is being threatened; operatives of an ideologically and morally corrupt faction of Religious zealots and financiers  are refusing to cooperate with and are actively attempting to impede our duly elected authorities during ongoing investigations into the covert missions by rouge factions of the right wing political establishment  attempting to subvert our personal rights and liberty’s and freedoms. By flooding the court systems at every level with extremist ideologues and party insiders, they are quietly dismantling our constitution and election fraud has driven their rise to power. Officials and appointees at the highest levels of the Bush administration are compromised and implicated in this plot against America and sadly there is evidence that some  right of center Democrats may have been involved as well . They hate our freedom.

Buy wrapping themselves in the flag and inducing a fog of war the Bushites have declared that they are the true patriots put here by god almighty and charged with the divine mission of vanquishing evil doers where ever they maybe (as long as they are in a strategic oil producing country). By producing the landmark constitutional time bomb called the patriot act, they are sweeping away the very underpinnings of our great nation. Our way is clear. These extremists must be dealt with, they must be declared enemy combatants. Their rights under the constitution must be suspended. Extraordinary Rendition to Canada should take place with the appropriate interrogation techniques applied i.e., water boarding, sleep deprivation, stress positions, sexual humiliation, scary dogs, really loud heavy metal music and desecration of their Bibles etc.

Given the existence  and rise of fanatic right wing private Paramilitary groups such as the Blackwater militia mercenaries, utilized and funded by Bush, with the corporate oil and war dollars this cabal has pilfered and funneled for the last thirty years to fund illegal covert wars around the world . That’s three decades of unbridled, unregulated, warmongering, Neo-Capitalism set in motion in the Regan, Bush era.  True American patriots need to be called upon to mount a preemptive security sweep on the extremist enclave in the 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue neighborhood of Washington D.C.. Your boots are needed on the ground in an attempt to take our country back and return it to the beacon of freedom and liberty respected and embraced by all free nations in years past. Employing shock and awe tactics these Fascist evildoers and their minions must be rooted out at all costs, our survival as a nation demands it. By applying the guidelines set forth by the Attorney General and the executive branch we can circumvent the protections of the Geneva Convention and the oversight of the United Nations, Human Rights Watch be damned, stay the course and god bless America.     

by Keith Hupp (3 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 7 comments) on Thursday, April 3, 2008 at 1:39:03 PM
 


August Adams is a CPA and holds a Masters Degree in Psychology. He is an activist striving to create a fair and just world for all.
August AdamsAugust Adams is a CPA and holds a Masters Degree in Psychology. He is an activist striving to create a fair and just world for all.

It's astounding to me

how many people still have their heads in the sand.  Very sad.  

And no real response from our elected officials.  Impeachment hearings and the process of removing a leader for high crimes was a peaceful solution to what had long been removal by violent means.

The "founders cure for royalism" isn't working anymore.... 

by August Adams (10 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 387 comments) on Thursday, April 3, 2008 at 7:24:12 PM
 


Stanimal is a concerned citizen of planet Earth, wanting to promote fairness and harmony with fellow inhabitants.
StanimalStanimal is a concerned citizen of planet Earth, wanting to promote fairness and harmony with fellow inhabitants.

I would also like to see

the Bu$h & Co. cabal impeached, trials of Treason and by the Hague War Crimes convictions, with them spending their life sentences at Gitmo receiving "Enemy Combatant" procedure.

Have their illegally amassed fortunes given to the U.N. for humanitarian projects in the country's they have been "Terrorizing".

Then the world would see that the U.S. is serious about its "War on Terrorism".

These are just the lackey's who are part of a broader sinister plan of a privileged crowd to subject the masses to forced submission of the NWO agenda, that has been unfolding before us.

Much of the public has accepted the lies from Bu$h & Co. for 9/11, and want to bury its legacy quickly forgetting this episode of history, just as they have done with other administrations who have advanced the NWO cause.

What I find perplexing is how can one NWO president be impeached for lying about a personal affair, while other NWO president's are found lying about misguided foreign policy adventures, Treason, and other laws broken, are allowed to fade away. Same players, just different sides of the street.

But, I can only gleen bits & pieces from the Big Picture, and can't devote the time required to comprehend it all, as they have me busy toiling for useless paper the public has been conned into believing holds value.

by Stanimal (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 10 diaries, 332 comments) on Thursday, April 3, 2008 at 7:53:51 PM
 


Born in 1929 in Sheffield Yorkshire England. Left school at age 14 and worked as a painter & decorator until I was called up for National service in the British Army. Served in the army untill 1973, then worked as an electronics/radio engineer untill 1984 when i retired. Built a boat and sailed around the Med. for 11 years then sold it in Tunisia, returned to the U.K. then to Florida where I've lived ever since.
douglas kayBorn in 1929 in Sheffield Yorkshire England. Left school at age 14 and worked as a painter & decorator until I was called up for National service in the British Army. Served in the army untill 1973, then worked as an electronics/radio engineer untill 1984 when i retired. Built a boat and sailed around the Med. for 11 years then sold it in Tunisia, returned to the U.K. then to Florida where I've lived ever since.

It was so obvious even two days after.

In January of 2002 I started in thread on the Guardian talk boards entitled, " Why has there been no investigation of 9/11 " I did this because basic physics was being turned upside down. Buildings cannot fall in free fall time due to fire, it's impossible, cell phones do not communicate from an aircraft in normal flight. Based on these two facts I started to research and by December of 2001 I knew it was an inside job. I mentioned this to friends and family but got little positive response, only a well known British MP agreed with me.  You see Bush and company knew that people hate to think they've been deceived, hate to think their own government would murder 3000 citizens so it was an uphill struggle, and still is. Only tonight on BBC America they mentioned 9/11 as though the official story is true so people are reluctant to side with common sense, it's easier to go along with the fairy tale than upset the nursery. How can a 757 hit a wall make a small hole then disappear, it's just ludicrous, not forgetting of course that even an expert pilot would have had great difficulty even arriving at the wall. Whether Bush and company stand trial or not is up to the elected officials but my money is on a cover up, after all they have their careers to consider and the crime of the century must not jeopardise those.

by douglas kay (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 83 comments) on Thursday, April 3, 2008 at 9:50:53 PM
 



Wolfie

Bird Land

We are at a location that seems to drift as one imagines the world as it was and should have been. We are here standing on the shore as the boats bob in the waves. Nothing is as it should be expected. 

Live in the present and haul the rock of truth up on the plate of the earth's firmament and force the gravity of their lies to weigh them down. There are no flights of fancy when the facts clip the wings of fowl that smell in their pens.

Wolfie  a believer

by Wolfie (8 articles, 0 quicklinks, 9 diaries, 972 comments) on Friday, April 4, 2008 at 1:12:28 AM
 


I am an individual who is interested in exposing the true events of the 9/11 attacks.
CB BrooklynI am an individual who is interested in exposing the true events of the 9/11 attacks.

9/11 Court Cases - US District Court

Court Cases in the US District Court,
Southern District of New York,
with Attorney Jerry Leaphart:

** Dr Judy Wood, suing on behalf of the United States of America and demanding a Trial by Jury, has evidence that Directed Energy Weapons were a causal factor in the destruction of the World Trade Center:

http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html

Docket No. 1:07-cv-03314-GBD
Title: Dr. Judy Wood ex rel. USA vs. Applied Research Associates, Inc. et al.
Judge: George B. Daniels


** Dr Morgan Reynolds, suing on behalf of the United States of America and demanding a Trial by Jury, has evidence that the Media broadcasted cartoons of an airplane hitting the South Tower:

http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=federal_case

Docket No. 1:07-cv-04612-GBD
Title: Dr. Morgan Reynolds ex rel. USA vs. Science Applications International Corp. et al.
Judge: George B. Daniels

PRESS RELEASE: 9/11 Qui Tam Jurisdictional Challenges Filed - 2/29/08 - Two Qui Tam cases - U.S. District Court, SDNY -- 9/11 related - One alleges Twin Towers destroyed by Directed Energy Weapons - Other alleges No Planes hit the towers - Directed energy weapons toxic effects continue at Ground Zero:

http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_rugbyzhg_080307_9_2f11_qui_tam_jurisdi.htm

PRESS RELEASE: Scientists See WTC - Hutchison Effect Parallel - On a Washington DC local radio station, WPFW, Scientists discuss true nature of destruction of WTC Complex on 9/11 and conclude it was related to a known effect:

http://www.prlog.org/10048184-scientists-see-wtc-hutchison-effect-parallel.html

 

The 9/11 attacks, the 9/11 cover up, and the 9/11 "truth movement" were orchestrated by people associated with directed energy weapons and the media:

9/11 Directed Energy Weapon / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline

Debunking the 9/11 *Anti-No-Plane-Theory* Myths

 

 

 

The following are two excerpts from a court document filed by Dr Wood’s attorney, Jerry Leaphart, for the Directed Energy Weapon court case:


080321_AffirmJVL90.pdf
http://drjudywood.com/#challenges


The connection between the central claim of the plaintiff herein and the defendant, Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC) is clear and apparent. SAIC assigned John Eichner to lead SAIC’s team assigned to the NIST, NCSTAR 1 project. The public record confirms that John Eichner has expertise in the development and testing of instrumentalities and apparatus that are used in directed energy weapons (DEW), as confirmed by a number of publicly available technical journals.





...it is to be noted that SAIC has been notified that plaintiff is aware of SAIC’s involvement in the following activities, among other activities, that have a bearing upon this case:

A–SAIC has been present and involved in GZ cleanup from 9/11/01 to the present.
B–SAIC is a manufacturer, tester, and developer of Directed Energy Weaponry (DEW).
C–SAIC is involved in research, development and implementation of psychological warfare tactics and a wide variety of psychological operations (collectively, psy ops) and has been so engaged in such operations at all times relevant to this matter.
D–SAIC currently exercises control of ingress to and egress from GZ in its capacity of having control of the ’security’ of the site.
E–SAIC is aware that GZ, which includes the Bankers Trust building site, has not been remediated and that what Dr. Wood refers to as ‘fuming’ is among the indicators of the need for ongoing remediation.
F–Administrative control of and responsibility for NIST’s NCSTAR1 project was given over to SAIC.

 

by CB Brooklyn (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 382 comments) on Friday, April 4, 2008 at 4:16:56 AM
 


I'm an artist, a thinker, a wife, a mother, and a grandmother.
VierotchkaI'm an artist, a thinker, a wife, a mother, and a grandmother.

Dr Judy Wood

This Dr Judy Wood business is a deliberate attempt to make "9/11 Truthers" look ridiculous - to put a spanner in the works of seeking the truth about 9/11 and what really occurred - by those who want us all to believe the official conspiracy theory.

by Vierotchka (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 36 comments) on Friday, April 4, 2008 at 8:16:51 PM
 


Len Hart is a Houston based film/video producer specializing in shorts and full-length documentaries. He is a former major market and network correspondent; credits include CBS, ABC-TV and UPI. He maintains the progressive blog: The Existentialist Cowboy
Len HartLen Hart is a Houston based film/video producer specializing in shorts and full-length documentaries. He is a former major market and network correspondent; credits include CBS, ABC-TV and UPI. He maintains the progressive blog: The Existentialist Cowboy

Bush wages war on the American people

Thanks for all the great comments ---EVERYONE!

And thanks for ignoring my typos.

In the meantime, consider the words of Che with regard to governments --like ours --which wage war upon the people:

"People must see clearly the futility of maintaining the fight for social goals within the framework of civil debate. When the forces of oppression come to maintain themselves in power against established law; peace is considered already broken."

--Guerilla Warfare, Che Guevara

 So ---the question, then, is not whether there is to be a revolution or not! Bush made that decision and has, in fact, waged war upon the people of the US. The question, rather, is what are we going to do to make sure that the people win? 

by Len Hart (119 articles, 153 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 454 comments) on Friday, April 4, 2008 at 5:24:32 AM
 


a concerned citizen and supporter of a new Coalition 3rd Party; as well as the Open Source Energy Movement!
Steve Windisch (jibbguy)a concerned citizen and supporter of a new Coalition 3rd Party; as well as the Open Source Energy Movement!

Thank You for your work

I and many appreciate the work you have done, and applaud you and your excellent blog site!

There is a major problem with an armed insurrection: It plays into "their" hands perfectly (and is not likely to succeed). As a means and excuse for  shutting down the Internet, of detaining peace, 9/11 Truth, and Impeachment activists into FEMA camps, and/or blaming the next false-flag "terror" attack on us as "anarchists".

We can take back the country peacefully imo. What it will take is to form a new coalition reform third party; one with the single plank and rally cry of "We must make the Nation safe to argue in, before continuing the argument!"

By attracting disillusioned concerned citizens from every political stripe, we could gain enough votes to win the Presidential election. We could then turn the Executive Powers to use for "good", breaking the grip of corruption and secret control. We can "free" the corporate media, send the secret controllers into retreat. There is a real chance of doing this, in 2008 .

We need to contact our reform candidates and urge them to unite... And form a new Coalition Reform Third Party around them.

For even if this new third party did not succeed this year, I believe it would have a profound positive effect anyway; as a means of shaking up the mainstream parties and making more people aware of the actual problems we face. And it would prove that polarization and division are not the inevitable facts of life in our politics; that love for our Nation can transcend this; that we as a people can put aside our differences and work together for noble goals.

Consider this: For an armed insurrection to succeed, enough people must be made aware of how vast the problem is. And if that were the case, then we could then do so peacefully using elections.

by Steve Windisch (jibbguy) (8 articles, 0 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 131 comments) on Friday, April 4, 2008 at 10:57:09 AM
 


Len Hart is a Houston based film/video producer specializing in shorts and full-length documentaries. He is a former major market and network correspondent; credits include CBS, ABC-TV and UPI. He maintains the progressive blog: The Existentialist Cowboy
Len HartLen Hart is a Houston based film/video producer specializing in shorts and full-length documentaries. He is a former major market and network correspondent; credits include CBS, ABC-TV and UPI. He maintains the progressive blog: The Existentialist Cowboy

Revolutions need not be violent

You are correct --an armed insurrection will simply give them the pretext to round us all up and stick us in a FEMA concentration camp.

You wrote:

We can take back the country peacefully imo. What it will take is to form a new coalition reform third party; one with the single plank and rally cry of "We must make the Nation safe to argue in, before continuing the argument!"

By attracting disillusioned concerned citizens from every political stripe, we could gain enough votes to win the Presidential election. We could then turn the Executive Powers to use for "good", breaking the grip of corruption and secret control. We can "free" the corporate media, send the secret controllers into retreat. There is a real chance of doing this, in 2008 .


I think we have been thinking along the same lines. Here are some of my thoughts that address some of the same issues. Certainly --any revolution must be a REAL revolution.

1) merely electing Obama is not enough and we must never again be complacent.

2) We must get the facts to a Federal Judge who will appoint a Federal Grand jury to indict and bring the gang to justice.

3) we have to convene a new people's convention; we have that lawful right

4) the first thing on the agenda of the People's Convention is re-writing NEW CONSTITUTION that re-affirms the Bill of Rights, plugs up the loopholes that Bushco have exploited; and re-asserts the balance of power. We may consider criminal penalties for no-bid contracts and provable war profiteering based upon cronyism and fraud!

5) We write strong an un-ambiguous prohibitions against war crimes and strengthen US committments to Geneva and Nuremberg.

6) We provide for the direct election of President (eliminating the Electorial College) and we set STRICT spending limits on campaigns. We make it impossible for coporations to 'buy' any office --especially the office of President. We do that by DESTROYING Constitutionally the idea that 'corporations' are 'people' ---the so-called principle of 'corporate personhood". We make corporations like Union Carbide and Dow CRIMINALLY responsible for Bhopal etc.

With clear, contemporary, bullet proof language -- We STRIP 'Presidents' of 'executive privilege'. In fact, we may just abolish the office of Pesident in favor of a Prime Minister. We make it clear to the executive branch that they work for US! Not the other way 'round.

7) WE BREAK UP THE CORPORATE MONOPOLY ON BIG MEDIA! We RESTORE the fairness doctrione; limit the number of media outlets that can be owned by a single owner in a market; we grant community access to local groups. We give individuals and small grass roots groups a voice denied them by the big coporate bosses at Fox et al.

How's that for a start?

The primary targets of this revolution are 1) the Military/Industrial complex 2) the very principle of 'lobbying' ---especially by corporations. 3) No bid contractors like Halliburton and Blackwater can be put out of business by making it impossible for them to suckle at the public teat; 4) we bust up 'big corporate, radical conversative, extreme right wing media. We BUST UP the hate fest that had been perpetrated on this country by the likes of Rush Limbaugh and Billo Really! Let them find honest work in a people's media. They won't get far.

LOVE LIVE THE REVOLUTION!

by Len Hart (119 articles, 153 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 454 comments) on Friday, April 4, 2008 at 11:35:18 AM
 


I'm an artist, a thinker, a wife, a mother, and a grandmother.
VierotchkaI'm an artist, a thinker, a wife, a mother, and a grandmother.

Standstill

If everyone, or if a critical mass of people, went on a general strike which would bring the country to a standstill, the government would soon enough make concessions or simply break down. The French are very good at it - when they really don't like what the government has done or is doing, they block roads and trains, and keep it so until the government gives in to their demands.

by Vierotchka (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 36 comments) on Friday, April 4, 2008 at 8:22:27 PM
 


Just an ordinary nobody who's glad he took typing in 9th grade.
Alan WilliamsJust an ordinary nobody who's glad he took typing in 9th grade.

The FBI has no doubt....

"We at this point definitely know the 19 hijackers who were responsible," [Mueller] said.

by Alan Williams (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 479 comments) on Monday, April 7, 2008 at 3:12:04 AM
 


Len Hart is a Houston based film/video producer specializing in shorts and full-length documentaries. He is a former major market and network correspondent; credits include CBS, ABC-TV and UPI. He maintains the progressive blog: The Existentialist Cowboy
Len HartLen Hart is a Houston based film/video producer specializing in shorts and full-length documentaries. He is a former major market and network correspondent; credits include CBS, ABC-TV and UPI. He maintains the progressive blog: The Existentialist Cowboy

Mueller can't keep his stories straight --show me an autopsy

"FBI Director Robert Mueller, in a speech at the Commonwealth Club on April 19, 2002, said: "In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper - either here in the United States, or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere - that mentioned any aspect of the September 11 plot."

Yet --Mueller would tell another tale:

"(AP) The FBI has resolved questions about the identities of the 19 hijackers involved in the Sept. 11 attacks and has discovered places outside the United States where the conspiracy was planned, FBI Director Robert Mueller said Friday.

Saudi Arabian officials and others have questioned whether some of the hijackers identified by the FBI in the weeks after the attacks used stolen identifications. Mueller said those questions have been answered.

"We at this point definitely know the 19 hijackers who were responsible," he said. "We have been successful in working with our foreign counterparts in identifying places where the conspiracy we believe was hatched as well as others who may have been involved in the conspiracy." --CBS News

BOTH CANNOT BE TRUE!

But that's not all:

"Further questions have arisen regarding the number and identities of the alleged hijackers. On 13 September 2001, FBI Director Robert Mueller was reported in the press to have said that "18 hijackers were on the four planes". Yet a few days later that number grew to 19. If the passenger lists had been the source for the former statement, how could the number suddenly increase on the base of the same lists? What person was added to the list, by whom and why? Another perplexing question regarding these lists is the fact that between five and seven alleged hijackers have been reported alive by main media, including the BBC and the New York Times. This evidence was not denied by the FBI, who demonstrated, however, little inclination to interview these "living" suicide-bombers and their families and proffered an explanation to this anomaly as caused by "stolen identities" or because Arab names are prone to misspelling. Yet the FBI maintained the original names and photographs of the alleged hijackers on its website, including of those who are currently living. On November 3, 2001, FBI Director Robert Mueller said that "investigators have established the true identities of all 19 of the Sept. 11 hijackers" (Karen Gullo, AP writer, emphasis added). Yet, attributing mass murder to 19 named individuals - who cannot defend themselves - without proving their culpability, is a case of gross defamation as well as an unconscionable attack on the honor of the families of these individuals. The very attribution of the deeds to Arabs, the identity of whom are not even proved, represents also a form of racial incitement." --Elias Davidsson, Global Research

And, of course, On September 23, 2001 the BBC reported that four of the hijack "suspects" - Waleed Al Shehri, Abdulaziz Al Omari, Saeed Alghamdi, and possibly Khalid Al Midhar - were alive. On September 12, 2001 ABC News reported that "investigators have identified all the hijacker