Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
November 9, 2006 at 12:35:32

View Ratings | Rate It

Tough to Admit, But DeLay Was Right

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Lawrence Fiarman (about the author)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Lawrence Fiarman - Writer

"The Democrats didn't win," said Tom DeLay, the former Texas congressman who resigned after being indicted for breaking campaign finance laws. "Republicans lost." Amid the ongoing celebrations, we dare to point out that unfortunately, he's right.

Voters cast their ballots with corruption in mind. They were thinking not only of malfeasance, but also government incompetence in conducting war and recovering from natural disasters. They were voting for a change, motivated by the very bad example Republicans have recently provided.

That's good. It's good to see American voters stand up on their hind legs and angrily say enough is enough. The Republicans surely got the voters attention.

But it would be easy to make the mistake that it was all the good things the Democrats want to do that got the voters attention. No, Democrats were just the alternative to what wasn't working.

OK, what doesn't work is now obvious. So, Democrats know what not to do. To keep the voters' confidence, Democrats will need to do find a way to do what does work. That's a little harder to figure out.

Tax and spend liberalism does not work for the voters. That was why there was the Reagan Revolution. The 2006 election finally put an end to the Reagan Revolution, just as the Reagan Revolution put an end to tax and spend liberalism. Voters did not vote to bring back tax and spend liberalism. Democrats need to find the 21st century path for the party. Taking the 20th century path again will not lead anywhere.

If the Republicans hadn't made such major mistakes as those represented by Jack Abramoff, Iraq, and Katrina, moderate and independent voters would not have voted for Democrats. They would have continued to vote against high taxes and against things they feel represent loose morals, such as gay marriage and overused abortions. The hearts of Democrats say it shouldn't be so, but it will be hard for Democrats to carry the Congress and Presidency in future elections without recognizing and admitting this truth. A new middle road, a broader socially appealing path must be cleared in order to keep the voters that gave Democrats this victory.

For now, Democrats must only clean up the Republicans' messes to get well-deserved credit. It's a Herculean task, but well within feasibility. By 2008, Democrats will need to offer a socially appealing path as well, that offers more than mere competence and ethics, the baseline expectation of today's voter.

With time and new pressing issues and fears, voters will forget the then distant messes Republican made. Voters minds will eventually turn to "where will Democrats lead us," forgetting their anger over where Republicans have taken us.

 

http://theviewfrommycouch.blogspot.com/

Lawrence Fiarman is a freelance writer and former columnist for the local newspaper in his midwestern hometown.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum