OpEdNews Op Eds

Blackwater: Legal Remedy Recommendation

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 5 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It


Become a Fan
  (6 fans)
- Advertisement -
The time has arrived. We know that.

Acting as one we can now end the torture regime.

Blackwater is NOT to get another contract paid for by US taxpayer money.

Once again, here is the link to have Nancy Pelosi removed as House Speaker:

And here is the GLOBAL petition to impeach Richard Cheney.
- Advertisement -
I am seriously ill - but would appreciate your emails at
- Advertisement -
Help me get these items to go VIRAL, for which I thank you in advance.

BLACKWATER: Legal Remedy Recommendation

Personal Opinions

Disclaimer: These are not statements of fact, but private, personal opinions which may or may not be widely held, and are not statements of law; nor are they assertions of any judicial findings from any tribunal.

It doesn’t matter if there are “holes” in US laws; Geneva remains unblemished.

Blackwater can be adjudicated under Geneva

The laws of war are binding on all combatants, regardless their willingness to be bound by the laws of war; or their belief about their accountability to any law. Combatants acting with the belief that they are not accountable to any law impermissibly allows combatants to descend to barbarism, in contravention to the objectives of Geneva in regulating combat operations.

When combatants ignore the laws of war; or, through their conduct and statements, show they are not willing to be bound by the laws of war, then the protections of the laws of war may be denied by a competent tribunal. Justice is not served when employees presuming that no laws of war hold them accountable; and/or act outside the law, yet are granted shields and immunities not afforded to similarly situated prisoners. It appears the following legal conclusions are reasonable by a grand jury, inter alia:

All evidence gleaned from the Blackwater employees was made without any _lawful_ promise by a competent _tribunal_ to grant that immunity;

All promises Blackwater employees, while under interrogation for alleged war crimes, were or should have been known to be methods to induce intelligence gathering, and secure information in a combat environment; and any method to glean information should foreseeably been known to include any method, including "foreseeable torture or abuse" including false or unenforceable promises by interrogators outside the tribunal;

Blackwater employees knew, or should have known, that the grant of immunity was not by a competent tribunal; any promise of immunity they knew could only be enforce by a tribunal; any promise of immunity by an interrogator or fact finding was or should have been known to be not enforceable as a right of any defendant acting outside US laws, or conducting their military affairs as if US laws or Geneva were not applicable;

Blackwater employees were not lawful combatants; were not protected by US law; nor were they in a position in this situation in Iraq to negotiate for protections of any laws related to immunity, shields, agreements, or contracts;

Blackwater employees and legal counsel did not reasonably conduct themselves within all legal requirements; in doing so, they do not appear to be entitled to privileges afforded only to lawful combatants;

Adverse inferences are warranted. The destruction of the evidence on the vehicles was, or should have been known to be related to an alleged effort to spoil evidence, in contravention to reasonable standards of conduct Blackwater employees knew or should have known were applicable in a serious incident; competent counsel should have immediately known that the vehicles should have been safeguarded as evidence; assertions that the vehicles "had" to be returned immediately are not supported by a reasonableness standard, especially given their alleged involvement with a serious alleged war crime involving non-combatant Iraqi civilians;

All evidence gleaned from Blackwater should be admissible; all evidence of spoliage should be fully admissible to The Hague and or war crimes tribunal, with adverse inferences. The information was obtained under interrogation conditions where Blackwater employees knew, or should have known, they might be subject to promises that were not enforceable, or they were not entitled; therefore,

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5



Virginia Simson is a blogger - USuncutMN.blogspot.com as well as a blog on the uranium industry and hydraulic fracking at www.lowlevelradiation.blogspot.com which anticipated the Japanese meltdowns. She has a large archive of material on (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Infragard - First in a series

State-wide Foreclosure Moratorium: How to Get One

NOW Is the time to learn about the SPP. A tutorial

Martial law! Earthquake(s)! What is at stake. Alarmist action alert

Torture, the CIA, the NYT, war crimes and Mark Mansfield

Sibelgate: US officials visiting Turkey NOW


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I post again some real legal scholarship and no on... by ladybroadoak on Monday, Apr 14, 2008 at 2:47:26 AM
Father:  Finish up your cereal honey, it'... by CasaZaza on Monday, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:36:34 AM
I not only posted this on OpEd News, it headlines ... by ladybroadoak on Monday, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:54:39 PM
"Under a government which imprisons any unjus... by CasaZaza on Monday, Apr 14, 2008 at 3:07:10 PM
I was born in, and have lived in this country for ... by Robert P. Philipps on Monday, Apr 14, 2008 at 7:12:28 PM
the heat got cranked up just slowly enough that no... by ladybroadoak on Monday, Apr 14, 2008 at 8:28:58 PM
Postal Address Po Box 195192500 CM, The HagueThe ... by ladybroadoak on Thursday, Apr 24, 2008 at 4:57:47 PM
No PSC's = DRAFTWithout BUSA and the like, our... by Joe Rathbun on Friday, Apr 25, 2008 at 8:10:59 PM
A State Department Blackwater employee costs five ... by ladybroadoak on Friday, Apr 25, 2008 at 8:17:26 PM
I don't think myself elitist enough for a solu... by Joe Rathbun on Friday, Apr 25, 2008 at 8:55:37 PM