OpEdNews Op Eds

Blackwater: Legal Remedy Recommendation

By       Message ladybroadoak     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 5 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It


Author 1670
Become a Fan
  (6 fans)
- Advertisement -
The time has arrived. We know that.

Acting as one we can now end the torture regime.

Blackwater is NOT to get another contract paid for by US taxpayer money.

Once again, here is the link to have Nancy Pelosi removed as House Speaker:

And here is the GLOBAL petition to impeach Richard Cheney.
- Advertisement -
I am seriously ill - but would appreciate your emails at
- Advertisement -
Help me get these items to go VIRAL, for which I thank you in advance.

BLACKWATER: Legal Remedy Recommendation

Personal Opinions

Disclaimer: These are not statements of fact, but private, personal opinions which may or may not be widely held, and are not statements of law; nor are they assertions of any judicial findings from any tribunal.

It doesn’t matter if there are “holes” in US laws; Geneva remains unblemished.

Blackwater can be adjudicated under Geneva

The laws of war are binding on all combatants, regardless their willingness to be bound by the laws of war; or their belief about their accountability to any law. Combatants acting with the belief that they are not accountable to any law impermissibly allows combatants to descend to barbarism, in contravention to the objectives of Geneva in regulating combat operations.

When combatants ignore the laws of war; or, through their conduct and statements, show they are not willing to be bound by the laws of war, then the protections of the laws of war may be denied by a competent tribunal. Justice is not served when employees presuming that no laws of war hold them accountable; and/or act outside the law, yet are granted shields and immunities not afforded to similarly situated prisoners. It appears the following legal conclusions are reasonable by a grand jury, inter alia:

All evidence gleaned from the Blackwater employees was made without any _lawful_ promise by a competent _tribunal_ to grant that immunity;

All promises Blackwater employees, while under interrogation for alleged war crimes, were or should have been known to be methods to induce intelligence gathering, and secure information in a combat environment; and any method to glean information should foreseeably been known to include any method, including "foreseeable torture or abuse" including false or unenforceable promises by interrogators outside the tribunal;

Blackwater employees knew, or should have known, that the grant of immunity was not by a competent tribunal; any promise of immunity they knew could only be enforce by a tribunal; any promise of immunity by an interrogator or fact finding was or should have been known to be not enforceable as a right of any defendant acting outside US laws, or conducting their military affairs as if US laws or Geneva were not applicable;

Blackwater employees were not lawful combatants; were not protected by US law; nor were they in a position in this situation in Iraq to negotiate for protections of any laws related to immunity, shields, agreements, or contracts;

Blackwater employees and legal counsel did not reasonably conduct themselves within all legal requirements; in doing so, they do not appear to be entitled to privileges afforded only to lawful combatants;

Adverse inferences are warranted. The destruction of the evidence on the vehicles was, or should have been known to be related to an alleged effort to spoil evidence, in contravention to reasonable standards of conduct Blackwater employees knew or should have known were applicable in a serious incident; competent counsel should have immediately known that the vehicles should have been safeguarded as evidence; assertions that the vehicles "had" to be returned immediately are not supported by a reasonableness standard, especially given their alleged involvement with a serious alleged war crime involving non-combatant Iraqi civilians;

All evidence gleaned from Blackwater should be admissible; all evidence of spoliage should be fully admissible to The Hague and or war crimes tribunal, with adverse inferences. The information was obtained under interrogation conditions where Blackwater employees knew, or should have known, they might be subject to promises that were not enforceable, or they were not entitled; therefore,

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Virginia Simson is a blogger - USuncutMN.blogspot.com as well as a blog on the uranium industry and hydraulic fracking at www.lowlevelradiation.blogspot.com which anticipated the Japanese meltdowns. She has a large archive of material on (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

State-wide Foreclosure Moratorium: How to Get One

Infragard - First in a series

NOW Is the time to learn about the SPP. A tutorial

Martial law! Earthquake(s)! What is at stake. Alarmist action alert

Torture, the CIA, the NYT, war crimes and Mark Mansfield

Sibelgate: US officials visiting Turkey NOW