How? Wha- ?

Well, perhaps even you, Sage Reader, will recognize that ‘she’s’ really means ‘she is’ – Right? – Wrong. Failed. Here it means ‘she has’. 

It would take a grammarian these days still to know and admit that ‘got’ is both superfluous and ungrammatical, and I mean a real grammarian, rather than one of these ‘educational consultants’ who come from afar spouting in glottal accents screeds of theoretical nonsense written by research-fellows with smashed-glass names like their own, to occupy highly-paid sinecures secured for them in ivory towers by Family Friends and Country Cousins to craft ever more trash if possible even more injurious than this present instance.

So, to continue your lesson, let us now consider ‘Dan’s’. Well, the still bright-faced infants suppose, In that case, surely that means ‘Dan is’.  Wrong. Failed again. ‘Dan has’, they hazard desperately.  Wrong again.  Failed yet again. Then what?

‘Of Dan’.  The bright faces dim as the infants’ minds switch off, never to switch on again, failed forever. And how the international vermin prance, high-fiving, before settling back to devising further methods of stunting defenceless infant minds and reducing the goyim’s mind to rubble. – Er, Diligent Reader, is that ‘goyim is’? ‘goyim has’? or ‘of goyim?’ – Dunno? Who cares? Zackly, eh?

So now, ‘He must have gone’ has transmuted magically via ‘he must’ve gone’, through the wreckage of the clear and simple rules of our formerly clear and simple language, to ‘he must of gone’, and authentic ‘grammarians’ and ‘specialists’ easily persuade you to believe now and forever that they are right and you are not only wrong, but also certainly a subversive, probably a dissident and possibly ‘a terrist’ ripe for water-boarding.

So this is the art of ‘education’.  No, Reader, of course such a subtle art cannot happen without intent, inspiration and years of dedicated practice and self-denial, together with the denial of all that is good and natural.

Education? – Surely, should we not ask, leading whom from what to what? And by whom led?

For the aeons of our animal past until a mere two or three thousand years ago, children learned by the example of their elders.  Then whose idea was it to take them from their protective parents and families who cared, and corral them in a large and naturally unruly group where a single effete and carefully-trained individual would try to inculcate ‘amo – amas – amat . . .’, ‘new math’ and any other trash of social engineering the sub-human subversives consider will best blunt the natural instinct of children to learn, with attendance obligatory and the right to be beaten if they are in any way resistant to such unnatural practices? Do you think that such an evolution could have just . . . happened?

Well, children want to learn, they are learning machines, and to survive they can even learn to compete. But if you can take the edge off their interest and then dull their appetite for life in general, then surely no such result of your enterprise will ever be able to compete with those who preach to anyone daft enough to listen that they alone are ‘the elect’.

But why do that at all? Well, if you were trying to exterminate everyone else off the planet so it could be 'the property' of your sole and only grasping paws, then that’s what you, too, would probably do, wouldn’t you? Well, if you had the instincts and behavior of a hyena, sure.

Be which as it may, starting with the piddling little kids and their comic cut-out school-books and stuff was just on a retail basis.  But now these sly aggressors have come up-market to the big boys, wholesale. So now on a world scale we see them doing exactly the same thing. Just in place of the teachers they install venal mental perverts as our national leaders, and in place of the deliberately stunting school text books and the cane, they use the panoply of law and politics to strait-jacket the public, and the whole array of the media to mislead and misinform them. – Same instigators, same method, same practitioners, same result, same victims, same beneficiaries, only bigger, globalized.

Education? Politics? – Surely, should we not also ask, leading whom from what to where? And again, by whom led?

But, do we really have to ask who is inflicting these perversions of education on our defenceless children and of politics on all our unsuspecting nations? What’s the betting that in the ultimate background shadows away beyond the conniving and fulminating ever-sinister Bilderbergers there loom the stunted runts of the family that hold the purse-strings of the planet, with a name that starts with an ‘R’ and terminates, though never ever soon enough to repair any of the vast damage they have done to the world and the planet, in a ‘d’?

Then, if we know, and ‘know’ we do, are we really to continue to suffer the infliction of the worst that these international vermin can devise?

 1  |  2