Tags for This Article:

Congress (2864)  Government (2738)  People (2263)  Voting (1303)  Law (984)  Terrorism (896)  Corporations (820)  Torture (687)  Reform (480)  Liberty (312)  Funding (265)  Murder (251)  Immunity (168)  Depression (142)  Letters To The Editor (125)  Balance Of Powers (101)  Starvation (36)  Checks And Balances (20) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
March 8, 2008 at 21:42:23

Open Letter to Congress: Must the system of checks and balances come from overseas?

by Kathryn Smith (Posted by Kathryn Smith)     Page 1 of 3 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
 
Tell A Friend

(0.0 from 0 ratings) View Ratings | Rate It

Dear Congress:“My will, not thy will be done” is my joke about The Lord’s Prayer. A friend of mine replies with a smile: “And God says----NOT!”

~Where God and man are concerned, such is the relationship. But where Congress, the people and the Constitution are concerned, it really is the job---the paid position--- of Congress to say to Us, the People: “Thy will, not my will be done”. America is supposed to be a government of the people, by the people and for the people. The Constitution never defined the US government as being “of the corporations, by the corporations and for the corporations“. It also never said “Of the politicians, by the politicians and for the politicians”. Your job as Congress is to uphold, protect and defend the Constitution, which means intrinsically to implement the majority will of the American people. No one else.

~I regret to inform you, Congress, that you have chosen to do anything but that. The written statement by Sen. Diane Feinstein is a great example:

“We are going to have to disagree about this bill”, writes the Senator in her auto-reply about the flag burning amendment. However strongly many among us may agree or disagree about flag burning as a protected form of free speech is beside the point: The fact remains that with only a few exceptions, the overwhelming majority of you have taken the attitude that you are “the deciders”, seizing power which was never yours to begin with.

 Please be reminded, Congress, that we *pay* you to be implementers of the public will and not your own whims. You are our employees. You work for us, not the other way around! And that means that we have the right to fire you when the going gets rough. And we will, for all the reasons stated below.

~
A) Regardless of the fact that we are in a recession, you continue to fund the war, as if to deliberately bring the country into a depression, not merely a recession.

~Is this the thanks you have for the masses of people who pay your salaries with their tax dollars? Should we pay our own way into a depression and starvation just because you desire to squander *our* money in this way? Congress, you are frivolously playing with our financial and physical health. We hold you legally and morally responsible.

~
B) A war based on lies is better known as a mass murder ring. This is far from an act of “incompetence” as you say: It is a premeditated act. Is this what you insist on paying for, with our tax dollars? Unacceptable.

~C) Must the system of checks and balances come from overseas?  

~While still governor of Texas, our President un-elect had the highest record of capital punishment of any governor in US History. Hmm…..What of the fact that our President has broken more than 900 laws? Let me state that only gang leaders endanger a life out of revenge, as exemplified by the Valerie Plame case. Who but a criminal would abandon Katrina victims to die and withhold medical care from children and our soldiers? Since you refuse to impeach our President and our Vice President un-elect, is this the kind of behavior you support, Congress? Let me ask another very direct question: Who but criminals would treat signing statements as the law of the land?

~D) You have run roughshod over our civil liberties here at home, while touting Democracy abroad.

~“Congress shall make no law abridging freedom of speech, or of the press” says our first amendment: What about warrantless wiretapping? What of censoring and filtering the news media? What about gagging scientists from speaking up about global warming? What about gag orders in the National Security Letters part of the Patriot Act?

~ The first amendment “right of the people to peaceably assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” is surely being violated by tasering peaceful protestors, by threatening to jail or forcibly remove impeachment button-wearing citizens from Congressional offices, and jailing those who rightfully tell Condi Rice that she “has blood on her hands”.  

~ “The right of all persons”----not merely all citizens----“to be safe in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” states the fourth amendment. ~Only Red China jails people without warrant or probable cause, as legislated into the Patriot Act which you, Congress, voted for by overwhelming majority not once, but twice. What about CIA kidnappings and extraordinary renditions to countries overseas for torture? 

~ You know better than we, Congress, that Martin Luther King was wiretapped and shadowed by the FBI until he was finally murdered. And that’ s why laws prohibiting warrantless wiretapping were passed to begin with. So for what exact purpose would you now vote for warrantless wiretapping, if not to shut vocal people up? ~Oh, lest you think I forgot, the claim that this assists the hunt for terrorists is bogus:

~
The Nazis tortured innocent people and called them “The Enemy”, as you have done with more than 850 Guantanamo detainees who have actually been proven innocent. Yet you won’t let those innocent people go and you won’t close Guantanamo, despite torture being outlawed by US and International Law alike. Of all forms of racial profiling, this has got to be the most heinous.

 1  |  2  |  3

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Please expose your Lawmaker-or-breaker's voting record locally and urge readers to oust them

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Contact Editor

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments

Name is Rose Martinis, age 64, married. Atheist and retired dental tech. Hobbies: archeology, history, science, woodworking, wood carving and volunteering for non-profits.
uluroName is Rose Martinis, age 64, married. Atheist and retired dental tech. Hobbies: archeology, history, science, woodworking, wood carving and volunteering for non-profits.

A very fine piece of writing!

May I futher suggest that we all download this article and send it along with our own personal comments to our senators and representatives.

Thank you Kathryn Smith, it needed to be said.

by uluro (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 64 comments) on Sunday, March 9, 2008 at 7:09:54 AM
 


A retired Navyman who has ran for 1st. District of Tennessee as a Green with a primary plank of Impeaching Bush/Chaney and a secondary plank of listening to and serving people instead of corporations. He now has accepted the position of FOAVC Coordinater for TN. He also is a direct decendent both on his Mothers and Fathers failies of members of the Seneca Nation.
Robert N SmithA retired Navyman who has ran for 1st. District of Tennessee as a Green with a primary plank of Impeaching Bush/Chaney and a secondary plank of listening to and serving people instead of corporations. He now has accepted the position of FOAVC Coordinater for TN. He also is a direct decendent both on his Mothers and Fathers failies of members of the Seneca Nation.

Thank you

I appreciate your article. I said the same thing two years ago, and ran for congress. I ran with no money and even had to stop campainging because of a major heart attack in May. My voice was heard despite the blackout of coverage by the local news. My ideas then became a coalition called the longhouse coalition which was adopted by several dozen other people running for office from Maine to CA and from Fla th Alaska. I can't afford to run again, but am supporting the same Longhouse Coalition this election.

by Robert N Smith (10 articles, 0 quicklinks, 7 diaries, 101 comments) on Sunday, March 9, 2008 at 7:44:50 PM
 


As we enter the last half of 2008, it is becoming increasingly clear that whatever this rogue administration and congress has planned for our final demise, is about to take place. I fully expect to see sites like OpEd either seriously compromised or gone altogether.

We have little time left, if any at all. Stand up now or there will be no peace.

Marti OakleyAs we enter the last half of 2008, it is becoming increasingly clear that whatever this rogue administration and congress has planned for our final demise, is about to take place. I fully expect to see sites like OpEd either seriously compromised or gone altogether.

We have little time left, if any at all. Stand up now or there will be no peace.

Feinstein...the new Republican

I have long since lost any admiration for Feinstein. When did she decide that we had no voice in our own government? She like most newly converted Republicans has come to the conclusion that she is a demi-god.....and as such should not be questioned.

Feinstein, along with many others of ill-repute, is a shining example of why we should have term limits on all public offices. Too long in the same place and these people begin to think and believe that only they have an opinion of value.

As for the flag....I wouldn't waste my time doing something as pointless as burning one. On the other hand......I don't pledge allegiance to a piece of cloth.......I will however pledge my unwaivering support for our Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Marti

by Marti Oakley (19 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 57 comments) on Monday, March 10, 2008 at 2:48:40 PM
 

 

4 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Sarah Palin, A Wolf in Moose Clothing by Anthony Wade

Democrats, Conservatives, AND Sarah Palin Being Played by Karl Rove by Greg Purcell "Wordmeister at Large"

FBI/police ordered to curtail protests: Explains Amy Goodman's arrest? by Kathryn Smith

Sarah Palin: Small Mind In A Big Little Town by Judy Swindler

Republicans Are Mean by Mary Lyon

Limbaugh Watch: Palin Pregnancy Talking Points by Dean Powers

GOP Convention Day One – Let the Deception Begin for Team McBush by Anthony Wade

Video: Is Bristol Palin Baby Trig's Mother? Evidence & Pictures by theWeb

BREAKING NEWS: Palin took millions in earmarks as mayor and governor. by Ed Tubbs

Barack Obama - America's 6th Black President? by J. Nayer Hardin

Popularity Navigation
Control Panel:

Select Time
6 hrs 12 hrs
1 Day 2 Days
3 Days 1 Week
2 Weeks 1 Month
2 Months 3 Months
6 Months Last Year
Select Content
Articles Diaries
Polls Events
All Op-Eds
News Life/Arts/Science
Select Popularity
Page Views
# of Comments
Recommend Emails
  

Go To Top 50 Most Popular