An Undiscussed Corner of the Presidential Primary Election Fraud

Tags for This Article:

Populum Tag Cloud Control Panel
	Fine tune your search to access content

Articles	Links
Diaries	Products
Events	All

All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs

From:
Month Day Year

To:
Month Day Year

Alphabet Popularity	Count ON Count OFF
This Level	Sub-levels

Tag(s): Election Reform; Election Theft; Election-Voting Issues News; Elections_Campaigns; Fraudulent Elections; Kucinich-Dennis; Lawsuits; Media; Polls; Polls- Public Opinion; Presidential Campaign; Presidential Campaign Democratic; Primary Interference
Add to My Group

January 14, 2008 at 11:05:50

An Undiscussed Corner of the Presidential Primary Election Fraud

by Kathryn Smith Page 1 of 2 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_kucinich_080109_check_out_how_many_p.htm

Kucinich has won the endorsement of Democratic Candidates on state-wide bases such as in Vermont, Washington, Virginia and more. He consistently scores the highest in *independent* Democratic polls, running not only neck-and-neck with Obama, Clinton and Edwards, but even outscoring them all most of the time. In other words, according to Democratic circles, Kucinich is the favored Democratic Candidate.

In fact, Kucinich has earned scores ranging anywhere from 39% of the *independent* Democratic polls to as much as 77% of the poll votes!

See the polls in the link above for further proof.

In addition, ABC and MSM report that even according to their polls, Kucinich was the favored Democratic debator.

Here come the NH elections and there is rightfully an outcry concerning the theft of votes from Obama to Clinton. I am glad to see the outcry.

Yet, nobody is crying "Foul" about the fact that the mainstream polls claim that Kucinich is at the bottom of the pile, with only 2% in his favor.

That simply cannot possibly be true, according to all the independent polls.

Based on those mainstream "polls" Kucinich, Paul, and Gravel have been left out of public debates.

Who is funding those mainstream polls? Are they being tweaked intentionally for agenda-based corporate interests, telling voters to "Go home now, don't vote for Candidate X, Y or Z" ? Are these mainstream polls the ones to be questioned, or the independent polls? Why such a huge discrepancy? It's pretty unbelievable, far surpassing the 5% or 10% discrepancies in the votes between Obama and Clinton.

WHY IS THE VOTE THEFT FROM KUCINICH NOT ON THE PUBLIC RADAR EVERY BIT AS MUCH AS THE THEFT FROM OBAMA TO CLINTON?

WHY IS NOBODY CRYING FOUL?

WHY IS NOBODY CLAMPING DOWN ON THE MEDIA FOR CRACKING DOWN ON FREE SPEECH, FOR CONTROLLING THE AMERICAN VOTE AND BRAINWASHING A NATION OF PEOPLE?

THERE SHOULD BE LAWSUITS LEFT AND RIGHT. MAYBE THEN THEY'LL "GET IT" AND STOP PLAYING THESE MALICIOUS TRICKS ON US, THE PEOPLE AND ON THE CONSTITUTION ITSLEF. (Crimes against the Constitution are called "high crimes", by the way).

If we the people don't step forward and do our part to hold the media publicly accountable, we ourselves are to blame.

If the rightful Democratic winner loses with the false reputation of having only 2% of the votes, then it is also our fault.

1 | 2

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Please expose the polls as one corner of election fraud to the public in letters to the editor

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

This quote summarizes the nature of my concerns and the content of personal experiences which stir my activism: "Necessity is the plea for every infringement on human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves". --Paul Revere, House of Commons