Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
December 10, 2007 at 23:07:28

View Ratings | Rate It

Censorship in America? YUP! Examples here:

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Kathryn Smith (about the author)     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Kathryn Smith - Writer

Dear friends:

“To grant immunity or not to grant immunity, that is the question”. As if it even should be a question in the first place.

I want to report in to you about experiences of being censored. I do this not because I think it is I, myself, who am being targeted, but instead that we all are.

And it’s time for us to come out in the open with this, especially given the debate about whether or not to grant the telecom companies immunity. Because some people hold innocent beliefs such as “the telecoms are being forced into this: They should be granted immunity”, We must go on an exposee, in order to convince them of the absolute necessity for privacy.

Plus, the claim that the telecoms are being "forced" is bogus to begin with. It is no coincidence that free speech is the very first amendment of the Constitution. The fourth amendment protects us from unwarranted search and seizures. And to be wiretapped is the first step to paving the way for such warrantless searches/seizures/arrests to occur under the Patriot Act, which grants the FBI the power to arrest American citizens without warrant, probable cause or connection to terrorist/criminal activity (www.aclu.org).

So for the telecom companies to "comply with laws" such as warrantless wiretapping is bogus. What about the first and fourth amendments as "laws to comply with" ? What about the judiciary's fundamental role in putting a "check" on government power? Warrantless anything means, by definition, to undermine that judicial power and to hand unilateral, unchecked powers over to the Feds.

And power will always be abused. That's why our founding fathers set up the system of checks and balances, to begin with.

No, the telecom companies are not being "forced". THey are making a choice. And that choice affects Us, the People. It is We, the People who must be protected, not the corporations.

Imagine this:

I was on the phone with an author who is very politically vocal and widely published. He said he had a state-of-the-art cell phone and this has never happened to him before, so it was very strange to him: Every time we used the word “impeachment” we were fuzzed out, so as to be unintelligible to one another. Then I also told him I had called Congressman Robert Wexler’s office and talked to one of his Aides who had this to say about impeachment:

“We may not all agree about impeachment, but perhaps we all can agree that hearings are indicated. Then we all can check in later again about impeachment”.

Go figure that THE ENTIRE PARAGRAPH I QUOTED ABOVE WAS FUZZED OUT AND COULDN’T BE INTELLIGIBLY RECOGNIZED BY THE PERSON ON THE OTHER END OF THE CONVERSATION (or even myself, as I heard it garbled back into the phone line)! I then said “I think we are being listened to”, and he agreed with me: Suddenly, after having said that, the whole thing stopped. Hmmm.

Then I was on the phone with another friend who had attended an anti-war rally. The Secret Service had rolled up in a car behind him, and he gave them The Finger, in public. This was caught on camera and publicized in newspaper articles locally: Ever since then, his phone has been tapped. We were talking and suddenly, at a strategic moment in our activist conversation, the connection was terminated. I thought it was just coincidence and thought nothing of it, and called him back. He responded no, it was not coincidence and guess what? By golly, after I called him back, we both heard beeps on the line. We were being recorded!

Then my computer recently and as usual offered me the opportunity for a free update. Sure, I thought to myself. Guess what? Since updating my computer:

A) I can’t cut-paste from email or word processor to the Internet, or vice versa (you bet it's a process for me to post here to Opednews!)

Next Page  1  |  2

 

This quote summarizes the nature of my concerns and the content of personal experiences which stir my activism: "Necessity is the plea for every infringement on human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves". --Paul (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "ACLU Arrest"
Mayday 1971: Order without law : an ACLU study of the largest sweep arrests in American history
by Florence B Isbell


Number of pages: 81
Publisher: American Civil Liberties Union of the National Capital Area

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Kathryn by Andris on Wednesday, Dec 12, 2007 at 12:08:13 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum