OpEdNews Op Eds

When Will The United States be Sanctioned By The United Nations

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (9 fans)
- Advertisement -

Based on a report by the UN atomic watchdog chief that states Iran has no active nuclear weapons program(s), and our (US) insistence on pressing forward with sanctions, and pressuring other EU Nations to do the same, when will the United Nations finally get around to sanctioning the US for attempting to start another war? With our economy in shambles, if we were sanctioned ourselves, it would deal a devastating blow to America. This, I believe, is where the Bush administration is leading our nation.

Consider this report by Mohamed ElBaradei, The UN’s Chief atomic watchdog:


UN nuclear chief attacks hostile US claims on Iran

UN atomic watchdog chief Mohamed ElBaradei said Sunday he had no evidence that Iran is building nuclear weapons and accused US leaders of adding “fuel to the fire” with recent bellicose rhetoric.

“We haven’t received any information there is a parallel, ongoing, active nuclear weapon program,” the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency told CNN.

“Second, even if Iran were to be working on nuclear weapons … they are at least (a) few years away from having such weapon,” he said, citing Washington’s own intelligence assessments.

“My fear (is) that if we continue to escalate from both sides that we will end up into a precipice, we will end up into an abyss. The Middle East is in a total mess, to say the least. And we cannot add fuel to the fire.”

The White House Friday rejected any parallels between its Iran rhetoric and the run-up to the Iraq war, after fresh sanctions on Tehran and escalating US warnings fueled comparisons to the months before the 2003 invasion. MUCH MORE

- Advertisement -

Mr. ElBaradei uses extremely strong language in chiding the United States, and this is one time that he has addressed the obvious warmongers who control Washington that the UN is obviously reacting in a negative manner to our constant war rhetoric. Some of these statements are unprecedented, coming from the UN aimed at the United States:

and accused US leaders of adding “fuel to the fire” with recent bellicose rhetoric. (Emphasis added)

“Second, even if Iran were to be working on nuclear weapons … they are at least (a) few years away from having such weapon,” he said, citing Washington’s own intelligence assessments.

“My fear (is) that if we continue to escalate from both sides that we will end up into a precipice, we will end up into an abyss. The Middle East is in a total mess, to say the least. And we cannot add fuel to the fire.” (Emphasis added)

In recent months, Bush has predicted “nuclear holocaust” and “World War III” if Tehran gets atomic weapons, while Cheney has warned of “serious consequences” for Iran if it defies global demands to freeze uranium enrichment — echoing the UN resolution that Washington says authorized war in Iraq.

- Advertisement -

ElBaradei has been vindicated in his pre-war belief that Iraq was not resuming its own nuclear arms program, contrary to claims by Bush and Cheney. (Emphasis added)

In the face of such a report from the UN’s Chief Atomic Watchdog, a reasonable individual might believe that we would begin to lower the war rhetoric, but not Bush and Cheney, and they are actively pressuring EU nations to join our newest unilateral sanctions against Iran - and in many ways, it’s a type of extortion - as they hint if they do not join-in with new US sanctions against Iran, it may heighten the risk of war:

US looks to Europe to sanction Iran

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

http://thepoliticalbandit.com/

I am nothing more than a patriotic American that is doing whatever I can to further the cause of democracy, the rule of law, and am extremely concerned in regard the slow creep of "soft fascism" that has been destroying America's middle-class. I (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Pew Research Center Shows Elites Have Destroyed America's Middle-Class

International Concern Over Iceland's Katla Volcano Erupting Soon Is Justified

Gas Shortage and Gas Lines in Georgia

The Russian Conflict In Georgia Could Make War With Iran More Probable

FEMA Official States Bush Is Planning To Implement Martial Law

Democratic Response To SCOTUS Gutting Campaign Finance Laws Is a Sham

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 12 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
At the risk of sounding trite, may I point out tha... by Rosa Schmidt Azadi on Tuesday, Oct 30, 2007 at 5:00:35 PM
The UN makes decisions and takes actions by passin... by Brett Paatsch on Tuesday, Oct 30, 2007 at 6:16:01 PM
"He also EXCEEDED the authorisation to use mi... by Tom Murphy on Wednesday, Oct 31, 2007 at 8:19:11 AM
Tom - thanks for your question. I have no problem ... by Brett Paatsch on Wednesday, Oct 31, 2007 at 10:46:23 AM
Brett,I understand your reasoning as to why you cl... by Tom Murphy on Thursday, Nov 1, 2007 at 11:10:13 AM
I consider this to be important and I do want to p... by Brett Paatsch on Saturday, Nov 3, 2007 at 7:04:39 PM
"Do you agree that nowhere here (or indeed an... by Tom Murphy on Monday, Nov 5, 2007 at 3:17:54 PM
Thank you Tom for answering my questions. It allow... by Brett Paatsch on Tuesday, Nov 6, 2007 at 12:45:04 AM
I follow you're logic – and much to your dismay ... by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Nov 6, 2007 at 8:19:02 AM
By "position", I'm referring to any ... by William Cormier on Tuesday, Nov 6, 2007 at 8:53:33 AM
Well, thank you! But in all honesty I am only who ... by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Nov 6, 2007 at 8:43:00 PM
I disagree that 1441 introduced a "restric... by Brett Paatsch on Wednesday, Nov 7, 2007 at 1:56:19 AM