Tags for This Article:

Iran (2454)  Foreign Policy (1030) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ;
Add to My Group
March 26, 2007 at 10:03:54

Iran blackmails, Britain negotiates

by Jubin Afshar     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

Iran has once again seized British sailors just like it did three years ago. In that episode Iran managed to extract as much leverage on the British government as it could to steer itself through rough international waters designed to halt its pursuit of nuclear weapons.

The seizure of the British servicemen this time around, was again accompanied with tough talk from Tehran and its military spokesman and accusations that the British “illegal entrance into Iranian waters” is “a suspicious and aggressive action.”

Iranian state media reported that the 15 Britons had been transferred to Tehran, where a senior Iranian military official was quoted as saying they had “confessed to illegal entry into Iran’s waters.”

What is Tehran up to?

Well if you’ve ever watched a Mafia movie, you would know exactly what the Iranian regime is up to. The mullahs see the EU and the British as weak states that succumb to blackmail. The regime has reason to believe so because it has tested them before and found its blackmail to work. So why not give it a try again now that Tehran is in trouble with the UN Security Council and the international community over its nuclear program and its terrorist intervention in Iraq and Lebanon?

The regime wants bargaining chips. Unfortunately, the British and EU reaction was feeble with the BBC reporting that Lord Triesman had “frank and civil” talks with Iranian ambassador Rasoul Movahedian. The talks were followed by further Iranian threats and the movement of the Britons to Tehran where it was guaranteed that they could be used to extract the highest price from the British government.

A concerned EU foreign policy chief, Javier Solana, warned the seizure of the seamen must not derail the two-track policy of talking to Tehran and pushing for sanctions at the same time. Obviously, Mr. Solana must have been more concerned with the talking track then with the sanctions track. “It would be a tremendous mistake if these two things were mixed,” Solana said. At the same time Solana told reporters he was seeking immediate talks with Iran's top nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani about that country’s nuclear program.

"We want to get in touch with Dr. Larijani, this morning if we can, to try to find a route that would allow us to go into the negotiations," Solana told reporters on the sidelines of a European Union summit.

Well that’s something Tehran is sure to take stock of. Every time it takes hostages, ratchets up pressure, commits terror acts, and behaves like the rogue regime it is, the EU and British want to negotiate more. 

The scenario has been repeated many times before. One such blackmail was in 2000 when then Home Secretary Jack Straw proscribed the main Iranian opposition group, the PMOI (MEK) as a terrorist organization at Tehran’s behest. Now too the British government is keen to keep the PMOI (MEK), which is the Iranian regime’s nemesis, on the EU terror list despite an EU high court ruling that annulled such a designation in December 2006.

The move reveals the British government’s amoral policy of trading human rights and respect for rule of law with Tehran’s bargaining chips and commercial interests. Despite the British concessions, however, the Iranian regime like any criminal thug knows how to keep its victim in line by extracting even more leverage on its prey. 

Yesterday, Liberal Democrat leader Sir Menzies Campbell linked the capture of the British servicemen with Iran's desire to pursue nuclear development. He said: "The United Kingdom will not be blackmailed. Iran has a choice: to act responsibly or face greater isolation."

The capture, however, is a clear attempt to extract more concessions from the British government to keep the PMOI on the EU terror list. The regime knows full well that the EU is trying to deal with the CFI ruling that removed the PMOI from the terrorist list and wants to send the British a message that either they continue to keep the PMOI on the list or they are in for some theater in Tehran with their servicemen being led blindfolded to prison in front of cameras.

Hopefully the British government will act responsibly by removing the PMOI from an erroneous terror list on which it was wrongfully put. The government should respect the CFI ruling and annul the PMOI’s proscription not only because it is the right and moral thing to do, but also because it is the only firm language that Tehran understands, and the only way to set Britain free from blackmail by the Iranian regime.

 

http://www.neareastpolicy.com/

Jubin Afshar, is Director of the Near East Project at Near East Policy Research in Washington, D.C. http://www.neareastpolicy.com/

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
12 comments

Richard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.
Richard MynickRichard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.

Laughable rightwing drivel.

Hardly even worth commenting on this unintentionally hilarious BS. Anyone who's paying attention knows that Britain is the little poochie dog of the US, & the US is the liar, bully, and aggressor in the current Middle East tensions. Iran, while hardly perfect or a model society, is guilty of no serious transgressions of international law, & is not the villain here. This article's author apparently works for a rightwing Washington thinktank -- the same shameless liars who brought us the Iraq War, & are now pushing for an attack on Iran.

by Richard Mynick (2 articles, 3 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 1168 comments) on Monday, March 26, 2007 at 11:04:51 AM
 


Jubin Afshar, is Director of the Near East Project at Near East Policy Research in Washington, D.C. http://www.neareastpolicy.com/
Jubin AfsharJubin Afshar, is Director of the Near East Project at Near East Policy Research in Washington, D.C. http://www.neareastpolicy.com/

Opposing the Iranian regime is opposing war

Rich, it is more complicated than that. Britain is one of the main appeasers of the mullahs in Iran. Iran cannot be guiltless for the over 100,000 political executions carried out, the suppression of women, the violent clampdown on students, the censorship of the press and arrest of any non-conformist intellectual. I really think you need to study up on the situation in Iran before you decide for the Iranian people that their oppressors are not villains.

Anyway NEPR is not a rightwing think tank but you are free to call any names you like. Just FYI we don't support the war or aggresion and do believe that standing firm in the face of reactionary Iranian regime while opposing war is the only principled position and the right thing to do is to support the Iranian people's right to democratic change which they are denied daily and violently by the current religious dictatorship.

 

 

 

by Jubin Afshar (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 7 comments) on Monday, March 26, 2007 at 11:21:06 AM
 


Richard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.
Richard MynickRichard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.

OK Jubin, thanks for your comments. It is certainly possible

to have principled objections to the reactionary Iranian regime. However, if your position leads you to make common cause with the US/UK aggressors, to seek their help in overthrowing the mullahs, that is no longer a "principled" position. It puts you in a category analogous to, for example, Ahmed Chalabi & other Iraqi expatriates who wished to overthrow Saddam (for which good reasons certainly existed), but who were willing to accept US/UK assistance to do it (no longer a "principled position").

The general tenor of your above article, and of your other essays on your website, indicates that you are painting Iran as the villain, while refraining from acknowledging the far greater crimes of the US/UK. For instance, the present article is titled, "Iran blackmails, Britain negotiates" -- this makes it sound like there's only one villain, and that would be Iran, in your view.

Similarly, your 3/17 essay asks questions like, "But all the above really boiled down to one simple, central question: Is Iran ready to earnestly negotiate with the US?" You leave unaddressed the question of whether the US is ready to earnestly negotiate with Iran. And you speak of thugs like Zalmay Khalilzad respectfully, as though he were not a member of a gang of war criminals.

So, while I haven't specifically heard of your thinktank before, I get the impression that you are interested in overthrowing the mullahs, & that you're happy to accept US help to do it. Is that a fair assessment of your position?

by Richard Mynick (2 articles, 3 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 1168 comments) on Monday, March 26, 2007 at 12:34:07 PM
 


A writer is a rogue goose. All other gees fly in a flock formation; every goose knows his place and time for honking. The rogue goose is undisciplined. He leaves the formation indiscriminately to have a look at it from aside. He roams back and forth, takes a peep at the leader, honks a little bit from behind, distracts everyone and writes on what he sees. Time passes and as he wants to return back to his place he discovers someone else there. Thus he either has to wait until they land for rest...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Mark SashineA writer is a rogue goose. All other gees fly in a flock formation; every goose knows his place and time for honking. The rogue goose is undisciplined. He leaves the formation indiscriminately to have a look at it from aside. He roams back and forth, takes a peep at the leader, honks a little bit from behind, distracts everyone and writes on what he sees. Time passes and as he wants to return back to his place he discovers someone else there. Thus he either has to wait until they land for rest...

to see more of bio, click on member name

I want to add

that both two years ago and now the British were and are the members of the occupational military who unlawfully attacked and  destroyed Iraq. They have no right to be there, neither they have a right to be in Iraqi or Iranian waters for that matter. British know that. How would you like if, say Mexico attacks and takes Texas and then  sends its cannon boats to, say Florida shores? We seem to forget that. Iran did not send is cannonboats to Scottish fiords or Northern Sea. They are at home.  British are the  the ones who  hover around.

I sympathise to  the Iranian opposition movement but as I have said before, they are behaving like opportunists. I would like to remind to every progressive Iranian that  the govts of the US and UK  are not their friends, sorry. Thee will be used and discarded.  Again, if Iranian opposition wants  the true achievement, it has to demand first and foremost the refugee status for any Iranian who leaves Iran. Then  they will see very quickly how the EU and US will cave down on the human rights.

by Mark Sashine (51 articles, 19 quicklinks, 244 diaries, 3463 comments) on Monday, March 26, 2007 at 1:55:41 PM
 


Jubin Afshar, is Director of the Near East Project at Near East Policy Research in Washington, D.C. http://www.neareastpolicy.com/
Jubin AfsharJubin Afshar, is Director of the Near East Project at Near East Policy Research in Washington, D.C. http://www.neareastpolicy.com/

MEK seeks democratic change in Iran

Rich, the fact is that from a policy point of view we advocate a change of a very erroneous policy on the part of the US/UK/EU of blacklisting and suppressing the MEK. It is totally wrong. The fact of the matter is that there is no help from the US/UK/EU to the MEK and much aide and assistance (political, economic, and military) to the regime. The fact is that the MEK has stated that they do not seek any material assistance from the US/UK/EU. In fact the EU has confiscated MEK property and funds at Tehran's behest, turned a blind eye to the regime's terrorist operations against the oppoistion on European soil, and the UK/US has bombed MEK personnel on the Iran-Iraq border area, and the US currently holds nearly 4000 MEK members under detention in Iraq.

So just as you try your best to change US policy, we too try to point out that US policy towards Iran and the regime's opposition must change. There is a vast difference between the mainly bogus, foreign grown and supported, so-called former Iraqi opposition and the home grown, genuine, Iranian resistance movement that has given 100,000 people in the struggle and is supported for 28 years by Iranians at home and abroad. Perhaps we can review the history at a later time. But it is totally different. The MEK has stated that all they want is US/UK/EU neutrality in the struggle of the Iranian opposition with the brutal religious dictatorship in Iran because up until now all of them have sided with that regime and hampered the resistance's democratic activities in the West even by flouting the law.

The MEK has stated that their only aim is to free Iran from the repressive, reactionary, religious despotism of the mullahs and to establish a secular, democratic republic that will lead to a constituent assembly to set the country's future political system. As such they do not and will not, and I believe correctly so, veer off into blind alleys. The reason is that Iran is the key to Middle East peace, progress and security and the MEK is the main opposition to that regime.

I hope that this is understood.

by Jubin Afshar (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 7 comments) on Monday, March 26, 2007 at 3:46:59 PM
 


Richard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.
Richard MynickRichard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.

OK, thanks again, Jubin. I think I see where you are coming

from. It's very generous of you to have taken the time to explain your group's position.

If you get another free minute or so, I'm curious whether you feel that the Wikipedia summary of your group is fairly accurate or not.

by Richard Mynick (2 articles, 3 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 1168 comments) on Monday, March 26, 2007 at 5:21:49 PM
 


Don'pigeon hole me or sterotype me
pratliff94Don'pigeon hole me or sterotype me

Iran has executed 100,000 human beings?

Have the Iranians really executed 100,000 people in Iran?

Why did they do it?

In whose name?

On what grounds?

Wow. Iran has executed 100,000 people!

Is there any evidence of this? Surely, you are just blowing steam.

Don't they support Hezbollah and Hamas?

by pratliff94 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 962 comments) on Tuesday, March 27, 2007 at 12:07:12 AM
 


Jubin Afshar, is Director of the Near East Project at Near East Policy Research in Washington, D.C. http://www.neareastpolicy.com/
Jubin AfsharJubin Afshar, is Director of the Near East Project at Near East Policy Research in Washington, D.C. http://www.neareastpolicy.com/

1988 Massacre of 30,000 Policitical Prisoners, Juse one case

Please refer to here for documentary evidence of one of the most brutal episodes in the Khomeini era:

http://www.mehr.org/massacre_1988.htm

This is also an account of a former woman political prisoner of the same episode:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2004/09/the_1988_iran_massacre_crimes.html

I hope this helps you understand.

by Jubin Afshar (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 7 comments) on Tuesday, March 27, 2007 at 4:50:52 PM
 


I swallowed the red pill!
HanI swallowed the red pill!

You know what the Iranians should do?

They should send them to a foreign country that does legaly allow torture. Send them to the USA with the formal request to torture them at Guantanamo Bay to get all useful information from them.

Excellent publicity stunt. :-) 

by Han (0 articles, 2 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 196 comments) on Wednesday, March 28, 2007 at 4:46:09 AM
 


Don'pigeon hole me or sterotype me
pratliff94Don'pigeon hole me or sterotype me

Mr. Afshar

Thank you for the links in answer to my comments.

by pratliff94 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 962 comments) on Wednesday, March 28, 2007 at 1:48:15 PM
 


Don'pigeon hole me or sterotype me
pratliff94Don'pigeon hole me or sterotype me

Iran's terrible history as the new Islamic Republic of Iran.

It appears that the Iranian government needs no help, and are rather expertise in not only torture, but murder and rape as well.

The following was taken from the first link Mr. Afshar provided in his first link in answer to my quetions to him.

 

September 1 (Shahrivar 10)

Memorial Day in Remembrance of the Massacre of the Iranian Political Prisoners in Summer of 1988

The 1988 massacre started with Khomeini's fatwa, which read in part:

"Those who are in prisons throughout the country and remain steadfast in their support for the Monafeqin [Mojahedin], are waging war on God and are condemned to execution.... Annihilate the enemies of Islam immediately. As regards the cases, use whichever criterion that speeds up the implementation of the [execution] verdict."

In December 2000, Hossein-Ali Montazeri, a 7 cleric who had been for ten years the designated successor to Khomeini, the supreme ruler of the Islamic Regime in Iran, published his memoirs. His book revealed documents that confirmed what many Iranians human rights and political activists have been saying for years about the atrocities committed by the clerical regime, including the massacre of 1988. The documents made public by Mr. Montazeri show that on July 31, 1988 alone, about 3,800 persons were killed, only three days after the beginning of this bloody massacre. On the same day, in a letter to Khomeini, Mr. Montazeri wrote:

"At least order to spare women who have children and finally, the execution of several thousand prisoners in a few days will not have positive repercussions and will not be mistake-free. . . . A large number of prisoners have been killed under torture by their interrogators. . . . In some prisons of the Islamic Republic young girds are being raped by force. . . . As a result of unruly torture, many prisoners have become deaf or paralyzed or afflicted with chronic diseases."

As indicated in the attached document “A Call for Justice”, Montazeri was not the first to reveal this massacre. The news of this tragedy was already out for years in spite of a censorship imposed by the Islamic Regime of Iran (IRI) to ensure a complete blackout on their crime.

Fourteen years have passed from this tragedy in which thousands of political prisoners, were brutally killed so that the Islamic regime of Iran could continue its mediaeval despotic rule.

In order to inform the world community of this horrific crime, a crime that has been overlooked for so many years, there was a need to organize remembrance gatherings of this tragedy in a specific date and in a coordinated manner with the collective support of various groups of participants such that it will have a broad and impressive effect around the world. The idea was that by highlighting the crimes of Islamic Regime and appealing to the freedom loving people of the world we could play an effective role in stopping the help of the interest driven Western Governments to the Islamic Regime that is responsible for these and many other murderous acts. Therefore, it was necessary to first adopt a date, and then collectively execute a specific plan around the world at the same time. Based on the opinion polls conducted, the 10th of Shahrivar, corresponding to the 1st of September, was agreed upon as the Memorial Day for the victims of the1988 massacre of political prisoners.

by pratliff94 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 962 comments) on Wednesday, March 28, 2007 at 2:01:16 PM
 


Rosa Schmidt is an American married to an Iranian, hence the second last name, Azadi.  She's a long-time peace activist with a background in anthropology, education, and public health.  She's also one of the people who walked away from the falling Twin Towers on 9/11 and returned to help with the recovery effort.  Out of this experience of destruction, death, and horror came a deeper commitment to human life everywhere and specifically to non-violence.  Retired and sp...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Rosa Schmidt AzadiRosa Schmidt is an American married to an Iranian, hence the second last name, Azadi.  She's a long-time peace activist with a background in anthropology, education, and public health.  She's also one of the people who walked away from the falling Twin Towers on 9/11 and returned to help with the recovery effort.  Out of this experience of destruction, death, and horror came a deeper commitment to human life everywhere and specifically to non-violence.  Retired and sp...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Truth and reconciliation needed for Middle East

What we need is a truth and reconciliation process for the Middle East, as I explained elsewhere: click here course the Israelis and Palestinians, and the Iraqis (and Americans), are obvious candidates for truth and reconciliation. But Iran needs healing, too, as is obvious from reading Afshar's articles and the attached comments. Many people want revenge and many people need closure. The survivors among the mujahideen--along with other political exiles (from Shah and from Islamic Republic)--need a safe way back into Iran, and Iranians need to face up to what was done. Torturers should not live among us unnamed and unashamed.

Let's talk about this rather than calling for more warfare and violence in the name of democracy.

by Rosa Schmidt Azadi (6 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 49 comments) on Saturday, March 31, 2007 at 6:27:15 PM
 

 

12 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

The Mailer That Put the Final Nail in the McCain Campaign Coffin by Rob Kall

Obama Must Appoint a Consumer Protectionist as FDA Commissioner by Stephen Fox

On Naomi Wolf's Sounding the Alarm by Dr. Dennis Loo

Race in the 2008 Election by Sally Liuzzo-Prado

FEMA Official States Bush Is Planning To Implement Martial Law by William Cormier

Capitalism Condemned in Scriptures; Let's Dump It by Jay Janson

Resignation letter from the McCain Palin Campaign by Robyn Crane

Aries Full Moon October 14, 2008 by C.L. Pagano

Bailout Fraud: Does the bailout pass the smell test? by Paul Craig Roberts

What you should know about Barack Obama by miles mathis

Go To Top 50 Most Popular