OpEdNews Op Eds

"Discoverer" of DNA gets Foot in Mouth Disease

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It


Become a Fan
  (20 fans)
Dr. James Watson of the famous Watson and Crick team credited with the discovery of the structure of the DNA molecule is embroiled in controversy after stating in an interview that Blacks were not as intelligent as Whites.

Dr. Watson, now 79 and Chancellor of the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York, was quoted as saying that he was "inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa." And then continued "All our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours - whereas all the testing says not really."

Dr. Watson has had a somewhat controversial career from the beginning. Despite the fact that he and fellow scientist Francis Crick received the Nobel Prize in 1962 for their work on the structure of nucleic acids, many scientists have noted that Watson and Crick did very little research themselves on the structure of DNA. Rather, they were known for schmoozing Dr. Rosalind Franklin in the early 1950s as she laboriously and carefully collected x-ray diffraction data of crystallized DNA molecules. Watson and Crick used the x-ray data, which gave the overall structure and dimensions of DNA, and then used ball and stick models to work out the precise structure of the DNA molecule. Dr. Rosie Franklin didn't even get a T-shirt that said "I did all the hard work, but they got the Nobel".

Where Dr. Watson ran into trouble in his recent interview was with the age old canard that equates intelligence and test scores. The funny thing about testing is that it is done with tests. And where do you learn how to take tests? Usually at school. Anyone who is as intelligent as Dr. Watson should know all too well that testing shows how well you take tests, not how intelligent you are.

Overall, when ranking humans by so-called racial groups, Oriental people score highest on standard tests, Jewish people score high but slightly lower than Oriental people, Caucasians score slightly lower still, and Blacks usually score lower than Whites on average. Such test results do not indicate that Oriental people are the most intelligent, it indicates that they have been trained better to take tests. It says nothing about inherent underlying intelligence. The rank order on test scores simply shows that different groups of humans receive different amounts of test training in school. If Whites were trained to take tests as thoroughly as Oriental children they would score just as high, and it works that way across all groups.

All that such test scores show is that education is not doled out evenly among the population. It is an indictment of education systems not a measure of innate intelligence.

Dr. Watson should know better than to give himself such a serious case of foot in mouth disease.



John R. Moffett PhD is a research neuroscientist in the Washington, DC area. Dr. Moffett's main area of research focuses on the brain metabolite N-acetylaspartate, and an associated genetic disorder known as Canavan disease.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Are Dogs Carnivores?

Was it Nanotech-Thermite or Phasers that took down the WTC?

President Obama's Complete Dismissal of the Progressive Agenda

Is Your Computer Ready for the Confiker Virus on April 1st?

The Real Swine Flu Conspiracy


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
9 people are discussing this page, with 12 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

further proof that POLITICAL CORRECTNESS IS UTTER ... by Ben Marble, M.D. on Friday, Oct 19, 2007 at 2:58:09 PM
sound very sad, especially since this was not an i... by Kathlyn Stone on Friday, Oct 19, 2007 at 3:47:09 PM
Did you see his pix, K?  His bio may say he&#... by Sandy Sand on Friday, Oct 19, 2007 at 4:51:16 PM
The PC UTOPIAN idea that all humans are equal is a... by Ben Marble, M.D. on Friday, Oct 19, 2007 at 9:26:23 PM
yeah, sure, there are multiple kinds of intelligen... by Rob Kall on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 4:01:16 AM
Your own comment is driven by generalities that di... by Barton Kunstler on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 9:34:47 AM
So your brilliant deduction is that all people are... by John R Moffett on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 5:04:23 AM
with an African who lived 50,000 to 200,000 years ... by Kathlyn Stone on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 7:38:47 AM
what doesnt get looked is the concept of eugenics ... by tanya on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 9:14:10 AM
Tanya is on target. Cold Spring Harbor labs was at... by philip rosen on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 12:52:31 PM
included the following, in no particular order: ... by Daniel Geery on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 10:23:58 AM
Stephen Gould's book was a good read on the su... by John R Moffett on Saturday, Oct 20, 2007 at 1:01:10 PM