Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (3 comments)

Arlen Specter: The Puppet's Puppet

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

These people must think we're all pretty stupid. I don't know about you, but I am sick and damn tired of having my intelligence insulted on a daily basis by the self-serving, oath-breaking, law flouting, Constitution-shredding, murderous politicos inside the Beltway.

Arlen Specter's announcement that the White House has agreed to a limited judicial review of the secret NSA eavesdropping program (after tough "negotiations", of course) is fraudulent on its face, and glaring proof that regardless of all his tough talk, he is actually marching in lockstep with the most corrupt presidential administration in the history of our country, pledging his undying loyalty.

Arlen Specter, purely and simply, is a co-conspirator in the Bush administration's systematic destruction of our democracy, and should be tried for high crimes and misdemeanors right alongside the entire Bush administration cabal.

For irrefutable proof, one need look no further than the headline in yesterday's New York Times:

"White House Agrees to Review of Surveillance Program"

In a real constitutional republic, where a legitimate Congress would recognize that its duty is to serve the people and not the administration, upon the revelation of such a secret surveillance program as was revealed in December 2005, existing law would be reviewed to determine the question of legality. In this case the law is the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA), which clearly and unequivocally states that a warrant must be issued, either prior to the surveillance, or, in cases of immediate need, within 72 hours of the occurrence of the surveillance. The Bush administration has repeatedly and consistently violated this condition.


In a real constitutional republic, the president would not have the unchallenged authority to ignore the law as he sees fit. But this president has actually claimed this very authority, some 750 times, by adding signing statements after signing bills into law, which say that the law will be interpreted according to his hopelessly flawed interpretation of the Constitution.

Apparently according to Specter, however, the signing statement conundrum has been miraculously solved by this new agreement, which he says proves that "the president does not have a blank check."

But then Specter also says the following:
"There could be some changes, but if there are any changes from the bill which has been negotiated, they would have to be satisfactory to the president in order for the president to fulfill his agreement to submit the program to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court."

So you see, it's really quite simple. Thanks to our hero Arlen Specter, the president doesn't have a blank check, but he still gets to decide whether or not a court can review his secret surveillance program to determine whether or not it's legal. And if he does decide to sign this new bill into law, he can still add a signing statement that says he will interpret it consistent with his non-existent "inherent constitutional authority", as the head of the non-existent "Unitary Executive Branch" of government, and ignore it at his discretion.

Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to George W. Bush's New America, where black is white, day is night, wrong is right, up is down and democracy is fascism.

 

www.johnperryonline.com

Radio professional, music lover, truth seeker, politically unaffiliated, unyielding defender of the United States Constitution. If you'd like to know more, visit my website and click on the "Why I'm Here" link...

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Poor Constitution by skyreader7 on Saturday, Jul 15, 2006 at 2:45:24 PM
Blank Check by anthny on Saturday, Jul 15, 2006 at 8:43:49 PM
And just who expected better of a 'PubliRat?? by Brenda Walters on Sunday, Jul 16, 2006 at 4:02:29 AM