![]() |
|
Tags for This Article:
Congress (3116) People (2552) People (1708) State (983) Citizens (455) History Cultural (40) History US Founders (21) Cherokee (11) History US Civil War (9) Washington (9) Delaware (7) Cherokee (5) Smith (4) Smith (3) Cherokee (2)
|
(more...)
(less...)
Add to My Group
Cherokee history: Cherokee Nation (CN) and Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma (CNO) history, how and why CN and CNO are not one and the same, as the leadership of CNO would have the world believe since its inception in 1975. The Cherokee History is told and retold in many arenas on the world wide web. I like the articles at this link http://www.ngeorgia.com/history/ and all the assorted references and citing of all the different sources, of Cherokee history up to and through the Civil War... My saga begins with June of 1863 Near the end of the Civil war, The Cherokee knew the end of the war was near and what the results would be, so they set out to rectify a longtime wrong within the Cherokee Nation, the owning of another human being; Therefore the National Council of the Cherokee Nation pass an act emancipating their slaves, see an old photograph showing the Act here: http://www.cornsilks.com/1863emplaw.jpg then in April 1865 the final surrender of the South, and the end of the War. In 1866 because the Cherokee had sided with the south and was on the losing side of a war the Cherokee knew they must negotiate peace with the US Government, and this was to be by treaty, they knew there would be limits of tribal land rights, citizenship rights, etc...And due to the Cherokee Peoples status as a Government the people were offered the right to negotiate the terms of the treaty, not forced to sign as the leaders of the Cherokee Nation Oklahoma would have the world believe. One of the more humane acts of the Federal Government of the time specially in regards to Indian people, and since they had won the war with the Indians as part of the enemies camp. So the Cherokee Nation, after the Civil war against the United States, signed a treaty of peace with the U.S. The documents which were created during the negotiations leading to the signing of that historic document, the supreme law of the land today shows the Cherokee leadership did not oppose the adoption of the Freedmen they actually encouraged it. The records show the leadership of the Cherokee Nation were against many of the proposed provisions of the treaty. The provision which received more concern from tribal leadership was the possibility of a railroad passing through the Nation. Of the nine proposals made by the United States prior to the signing of the treaty, four of them were acceptable to the Cherokee leaders/negotiators. Five were unacceptable. When all was said and done and the treaty was signed, the Cherokee leaders/negotiators were successful in defeating all five. Only the four proposals not opposed by the Cherokee made it into the treaty. Does that sound like duress/coercion or forced to sign? As I have said the Cherokee Government were being treated with respect as the ones defeated in a war. And the most noteworthy and in relevance with today’s issues, of those four Government proposals, and unopposed by the Cherokee leaders/negotiators was the adoption of the Freedmen as Cherokee Citizens. The Cherokee were so caring of their Freedmen relation they set out a Proclamation and amended their 1839 Constitution. And it was (adopted November 26, 1866) Proclamation by the Principal Chief. Whereas the national council adopted certain amendments to the constitution of the Cherokee Nation, and submitted the same to a general convention of the people of the Cherokee Nation, called At Tahlequah on the 26th day of November, A.D. 1866, and which said amendments, with the preamble thereto attached, were in the following words, to wit: Whereas by the treaty executed at Washington on the 19th day of July, A.D. 1866, between the United States and the Cherokee Nation, through its delegation, ratified by the Senate and officially promulgated by the President of the United States August 11, 1866, certain things were agreed to between the parties to said treaty, involving changes in the constitution of the Cherokee Nation, which changes cannot be accomplished by the usual mode; and Whereas it is the desire of the people and government of the Cherokee Nation to carry out in good faith all of its obligations, to the end that law and order be preserved, and the institutions of their government maintained: Therefore, Be it resolved by the national council, That the following amendments to the constitution of the Cherokee Nation be submitted to a convention of the Cherokee people to assemble at Tahlequah on the twenty-sixth (26th) day of November, A.D. 1866, under the proclamation of the principal chief; and should said amendments, hereunto annexed, be ratified by said convention, then they shall be officially published, and declared by the principal chief to be, and shall constitute, a part or parts of the constitution of the Cherokee Nation. Article II. Section 5. See the 1866 treaty here at this link http://www.cornsilks.com/1866treaty.html read Article IX, the adoption of the Freedmen. Following the signing of the Treaty of 1866, the disloyal, racist members of the southern delegation began their slow, but steady ascent into power in the Cherokee Nation, even though at least one of their rank, William Penn Adair, turned on his former allies and began working with the loyal Cherokee leaders to rebuild the Nation and restore order. Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people: Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers www.cornsilks.com My name is John Cornsilk,
I am Married, same lady 52 years. I am a Cherokee Citizen of the United Cherokee Nation (UCN) Also a member of the United Keetoowah band of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma (UKB),and a member of the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma (CNO)
I live in Tahlequah Oklahoma, the Capital of the Cherokee Nation, also the home of the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma, who are illegally acting as the Cherokee Nation.
One of the purposes of my website is to supply the vistor with documentation and a place to discuss the pro's and con's of whether CNO is a BOGUS entity or not, and there is documentation to be found at cornsilks.com that I believe will attest to that fact, to get started click the CNO is BOGUS banner at Cornsilks!
I Also have a forum to discuss Cherokee Politics, Cherokee needs as Elders an heads of households of families with young Children in need. And we host the sites of community Organizations who will help these needy Cherokee people.
Simply Click the John's Place Banner at Cornsilks.com.
I am also a member of the Cherokee National Party , an advocate of same and above all am a Cherokee that perceives the salvation of the Cherokee Nation will be by people that advocate the Cherokee National Party whether they are a member or not, due to the fact I believe their creed to be!! "FOR CHEROKEE PEOPLES RIGHTS, AND WHAT IS RIGHT FOR THE CHEROKEE"
more of us John, thank you for putting these up on OEN. If you hadn't, I would have never seen it. I may belong to a minority here, being one who is very much interested in tribal affairs, especially those in the Cherokee nation in OK. A lot of people have been cheated over the course of the last one hundred years....and plus some. One such person was my grandfather's mother. Her mother, according to stories handed down, was full blood. Not sure which tribe and not sure if there even was a tribe at the time. They lived in Arkansas but moved to Oklahoma a while later. Actually, that part of my family moved back and forth between Oklahoma and Arkansas, many times. There's no way of me personally knowing but I have to believe what my Mom tells me. I can remember her Mom telling me pretty much the same things but in much more detail. See, this is what has come to be, a white man from Kansas with an English name thinks he's actually part Cherokee but he can't prove it and he has no ties to any tribe at all because his great grandmother was cheated out of her money and not granted the necessary enrollment to keep her name on the list of real native americans. She was a half-breed. I was told that she was ashamed of it and tried to hide it as good as she could. The US Govt. has done a good job of breaking the peoples up. And the ones who did stay on, who made the rolls were caged in and left in a state of misery. Life on the Rez is not always better than life outside the Rez. Or so I gather. If we look at our history, we can see a continuous effort being made to make rid of the last full-bloods, an effort to break any pride left in the native american. So now we're sort of seperated. Or so they think. We're out of touch, or so they think. It hurts me to se what is now (still) going on. I see the poverty, not only in Ok. but also in Az. where my immediate family now resides. We're not native americans. That fraction of our heritage that does point back to times before the europeans first set foot on turtle island isn't enough to re-intsall any real pride. But at least we can identify with you and the others. We are somehow related. We have common enemies. One is poverty, the other a criminal Govt. and their puppets who reside amongst us. I need to make a point of going south and east a bit next time I'm back at my place of birth. My great grandmother was named after all her father's sisters and all of her step father's sisters. Nobody could remember all of the names. My grandmother tried by singing a song using all of the names and telling a story about how Everell, Everline, Liza, Ann, Nancy, Jane, Valentine etc. came to be named that way. Last time I asked about the names, there were double as many. Shame on me for not learning the song. Thanks again, John. I'll keep my eyes peeled. Just wanted to let ya know someone cares. by
Tony Forest (6 articles, 15 quicklinks, 154 diaries, 1354 comments)
on Sunday, April 20, 2008 at 4:26:53 AM
P.S. to that reply this article by Rachel says a lot to underscore what I was trying to get at. In the spirit of keeping it real, I can’t understand for the life of me why anyone who is of Native American/First Nations descent would use a document like the Dawes Rolls which was drafted using the United States definitions of race to determine ancestry. I hope that they would understand how the US governments treaties and documents have never been used in a way that uplifts Native peoples, which is why relying on those documents should be obviously wrong. People who have been so decimated by racism should really know better than to engage in this racist behavior. by
Tony Forest (6 articles, 15 quicklinks, 154 diaries, 1354 comments)
on Sunday, April 20, 2008 at 5:02:43 AM
It's free to signup! And easy. And takes just a minute or two....
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||