Tags for This Article:

Clinton-Hillary (1110)  War Iraq (1005)  Corporations Military Industrial Complex (159)  Corporate Crime (149)  People Kennedy Robert Jr- (29) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
November 30, 2007 at 10:15:13

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Disappoints

by Joel S. Hirschhorn     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

RFK, Jr. once said: “the Republicans are 95 percent corrupt and the Democrats are 75 percent corrupt.”  This has been widely quoted because of its honest assessment of the corrupt two-party system. 

He has also pointed out: "While communism is the control of business by government, fascism is the control of government by business.  …The biggest threat to American democracy is corporate power.  …our most visionary political leaders have warned the American public against the domination of government by corporate power. That warning is missing in the national debate right now. Because so much corporate money is going into politics, the Democratic Party itself has dropped the ball. They just quash discussion about the corrosive impact of excessive corporate power on American democracy." 

Those these statements were made some time ago, a few days ago on November 28 he talked about the impact of industry on environmental agencies: “It’s been a revolving door of plunder.”  Kennedy saved special scorn for “the negative and indolent press of this country,” which he said has become controlled by corporate interests in the last 20 years.  “Americans have become the best-entertained, least-informed people on earth,” Kennedy said.  He also said five companies control 80 percent of newspapers and almost all radio, and those corporations are not in business to tell news thoroughly or fairly.  “The only ideology they represent is their own pockets,” Kennedy said. 

So his criticism of the corporate plutocracy seems as strong as ever. Such honest views of the sad state of America have made Kennedy the darling of many people – liberals, progressives and environmentalists. 

But the news yesterday was that this esteemed honest liberal has endorsed the candidacy of Hillary Clinton.  Now he says: “Hillary Clinton has the strength and experience to bring the war in Iraq to an end and reverse the potentially devastating effects of global warming.  …Hillary will inspire the real change America needs." Kennedy said he feels "very uncomfortable" about the amount of corporate money flowing into Clinton's campaign, "But I also think you can't come into this race with one arm tied behind your back."  How’s that for convenient rationalization? 

In examining media coverage of Kennedy’s endorsement of Clinton I could find no references to his earlier critical remarks of Democrats.  But people commenting on the New York Times article often were aghast at his endorsement, noting that it would have made much more sense for him to endorse Obama or Edwards.  Bloggers, so far, have also not been critical of the Kennedy endorsement.  The progressive community seems frozen by self-delusion. 

Here is my take: Hillary Clinton represents the worst of the Democratic contenders.  She is totally committed to take all the corporate money she can get.  She really is a hawk when it comes to the Iraq war and even voted the wrong way recently when it comes to Iran.  She is incredibly dishonest and phony.  The reason why there are millions of Hillary haters is that she inspires distrust.  A Hillary presidency would pursue corporate globalization and the terrible trade policies of her husband that has done so much to destroy America’s middle class.  Her views on universal health coverage do not seem focused on getting rid of all the insurance industry involvement. 

Kennedy’s endorsement of Hillary just shows how the status quo political establishment can rig the system to get what it wants.  What has Bobby been promised?  Head of the US EPA?  Support for replacing Hillary in the Senate?  Who knows?  But his endorsement stinks and puts a big blemish on his credibility and reputation.

 

www.delusionaldemocracy.com

Joel S. Hirschhorn is the author of Delusional Democracy - Fixing the Republic Without Overthrowing the Government (www.delusionaldemocracy.com). His current political writings have been greatly influenced by working as a senior staffer for the U.S. Congress and for the National Governors Association. He advocates a Second American Revolution, beginning with an Article V Convention to propose constitutional amendments. He is Chair of the Independent Party of Maryland.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments

In progress....
MsTweetieIn progress....

When Is The LameStream Media Going To Wake UP!

RFK, Jr. isn't the only one who disappoints in their endorsements.  Are the Clinton's so bought and paid for by huge neocon-run corporations that the teflon on them is hermetically sealed?  And why is it that every major news operation won't dig into Clinton's inappropriate fundraising tactics that go back to when she was running for Senator?!  I am livid that the politicians are not really "elected" anymore.  That was obvious during the last Presidential election (if not the one before that also. 

I found this video on Google put out by the Equal Justice Foundation for America and prior to viewing it I was wishing I could give her the benefit of the doubt.  But she is no better morally than her 'husband'.

And why is this video "banned" by the mainstream as is stated in the comments by the EJFA? 

I can't put the link up due to the length of characters but all a person has to do is type in at Google video's "The Video Hilary Doesn't Want You To See" and there you'll find it.  There are two parts to it with regard to a fundraiser held by Peter Paul back when Hilary was running for Senator in 2000.  Does violating Federal Election laws still enable a candidate to run for PRESIDENT!  I'll let people judge it for themselves, but don't flame me if you're a Hillary fan unless you watch this whole thing.  I am sick of the corporate-run biased mass media hiding the truth when corruption is easier to find thanks to the Internet.

According to EJFA, they say:  

PART 1 -
Hillary! Uncensored, the unedited trailer that has been ranked #1 video in Google Top 100 in the World, and debuted as a 1 hour documentary on http://www.youperview.com on November 5, 2007. Copyright T2P Media Inc. Presented by Equal Justice Foundation of America. http://www.ejfa.org

Refer to Hillary Clinton Accountability Project - http://www.hillcap.org - for link to DVD and other evidence of the frauds Hillary directed to win her senate seat

This is the video that's been buzzing around the blogs for the past few months, becoming one of the most viewed on Google Video. It shows the Peter Paul side of the issue, which involves allegations that Hillary Clinton has committed numerous federal election law violations, has lied about them to cover them up, all culminating in what might be felonious conduct on her part. Paul makes a strong case here. Will the media continue to do its best to bury what might be the largest election fraud in US history? Stay tuned...

This is the most shocking expose on the blatant corruption surrounding Hillary Clinton. Includes exclusive home videos of Hillary to expose the illegalities that elected Hillary to the Senate and the obstructions of justice that keep her there. The full documentary, at (www.hillcap.org) and (www.peterfpaul.com) will be released on November 1, 2007 by Equal Justice Foundation of America - CONTRIBUTE TO EJFA, NON-PROFIT WHISTLEBLOWER FOUNDATION - https://www.registrationfactory.com/v3/? EventUUID=2A54FEC2 .

TO ADVERTISE AND PUBLICIZE the ONLY documentary that dares to expose the evidence of Hillary's misconduct to the American people - Banned by the Mainstream Media!

Equal Justice Foundation of America

by MsTweetie (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 14 comments) on Friday, November 30, 2007 at 1:28:08 PM
 


Richard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.
Richard MynickRichard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.

I totally agree with your assessment of RFK's comments --

ie, with how deeply disappointing they are, in view of his earlier track record for candor regarding the 2 parties, & the corporate plutocracy. His earlier comments, in fact, could be applied with perfect accuracy to a phony sellout like Hillary, on the take from the corporatocracy.

When I saw the headline about his Hillary endorsement, I groaned aloud.

I don't have anything to add -- you made the whole point as fully & forcefully as it could be made.

by Richard Mynick (2 articles, 3 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 1232 comments) on Friday, November 30, 2007 at 1:58:05 PM
 


Retire high school English teacher. Grandmother of eight grandchildren, six of them Muslim. Love to travel. Have been to Russia, Spain, Morocco, Crete and Santorini, Cosumel and Chichen Itza. Alas, not enough places. However, the ocean anywhere satisfies the soul.
ChristieRetire high school English teacher. Grandmother of eight grandchildren, six of them Muslim. Love to travel. Have been to Russia, Spain, Morocco, Crete and Santorini, Cosumel and Chichen Itza. Alas, not enough places. However, the ocean anywhere satisfies the soul.

So disappointed RFK Jr. that you have sold out.

I am sure you have engraved on your heart the statement. “ I dream of things that never were and ask why not?” As you remember who said that inspiring statement, I wish that you would speak words of support for someone who also dreams of things that have never been, such as Kucinich, who talks about a  Department of Peace -- something that has never been.You are aware, of course that he also speaks strongly against the Iraq war, certainly not someone who supports its indefinite continuance. You hopefully are aware that presidential candidate Christopher Dodd promises his first action as president would be to restore the Constitution. And I trust you realize that the Constitution has been shredded under Bush/Cheney. How can you endorse a presidential candidate who supports continuation of the war and refers not at all to the freedoms we have lost -- to refresh your memory with a couple of big ones: habeus corpus and the Geneva Conventions. What has your endorsed candidate says about these things?

 

 

by Christie (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 143 comments) on Friday, November 30, 2007 at 8:10:14 PM
 


Retire high school English teacher. Grandmother of eight grandchildren, six of them Muslim. Love to travel. Have been to Russia, Spain, Morocco, Crete and Santorini, Cosumel and Chichen Itza. Alas, not enough places. However, the ocean anywhere satisfies the soul.
ChristieRetire high school English teacher. Grandmother of eight grandchildren, six of them Muslim. Love to travel. Have been to Russia, Spain, Morocco, Crete and Santorini, Cosumel and Chichen Itza. Alas, not enough places. However, the ocean anywhere satisfies the soul.

of course: said not says

While I am correcting my careless grammatical mistake, i would like to mention a grammatical error that is ubiquitous. EVERYONE uses it's to mean its. it's  means it is. its is used grammatically the same as his and hers: It's comical how it's wagging its tail. (Substitute his as a test. If it fits, no apostrophe)

by Christie (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 143 comments) on Friday, November 30, 2007 at 8:27:27 PM
 

 

4 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

NEW IDEAS ON RESTORING U. S. ECONOMY, for the Next Secretary of Commerce, William Blaine Richardson III by Stephen Fox

Detroit vs. Wall Street: The Trillion Dollar Class War by Cameron Salisbury

End of the Road to Moronity by Rand Clifford

Saving the Big 3 for You and Me ...a message from Michael Moore by Michael Moore

Credit Card Crisis Is Here / Derivatives Next by Allen L Roland

THE LEGACY; Dubya's Musings in the Halls of Never-Never Land by Braun McAsh

Paulson shoots another arrow into the heart of the Economy by Andrew Hughes

SO SAY THE BANKERS: Learn to Love the 'AMERO' by Patrick Henningsen

Leading lives of quiet desperation this holiday season by Sheryl Letzgus McGinnis

The Controversy Surrounding Obama's Birth by adeeba folami

Go To Top 50 Most Popular