OpEdNews Op Eds

A Metallurgist's Insights Into the Minneapolis Bridge Disaster

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (15 fans)
- Advertisement -

The incredible collapse of the Minneapolis bridge will send a message to the nation that has been repeatedly sent for decades, but that our political system has refused to effectively respond to.  America’s physical, engineered infrastructure has been in desperate need for massive spending to repair and replace, but the multi-trillion-dollar cost has been rejected by local, state and federal politicians.

 

First, understand that I have a professional background in this area.  My career started as a metallurgist, than I obtained a Ph.D. in Materials Engineering and became a full professor of metallurgical engineering at the University of Wisconsin, Madison where I taught about mechanical metallurgy and failure analysis, and in my consulting practice regularly worked on explaining actual failures of products and systems.

 

Many academic and professional groups have for many years produced countless reports on mounting unpaid public costs for updating our crucial physical infrastructure, including bridges, but going way beyond those to, for example, roads, water and sewer systems, tunnels and much more.  Make no mistake: The deeply researched and totally supported case for a massive national infrastructure spending program could not have been clearer.  But spending on infrastructure is not sexy and politicians at ALL levels of government have found countless excuses for not facing the totality of the problem.  Instead, public spending is dribbled out, dealing with the most urgent problems or, worse yet, the ones that are the most visible to the public.  But unaddressed are massive numbers of problems, such as the Minneapolis bridge and thousands more bridges, that our bureaucratic system has learned to game, postpone, rationalize and, therefore, put the public safety at considerable risk.

 

As a metallurgist I can pretty much assure you that if there is a technically honest and complete investigation, the ultimate explanation of the Minneapolis bridge failure will be related to fatigue cracking in the metal structure.  Already, news reports have revealed some prior observation of a fatigue problem with the bridge and that the bridge had a relatively low rating of four out of a possible nine, showing that it was structurally deficient.  The game played by virtually all government agencies is to find excuses for delaying the most costly repair or replacement of bridges and other parts of our physical infrastructure.  As just another example, in most older urban areas there are constant repairs of busted underground water pipes.  What is really needed, but avoided, is a total replacement of very old underground pipe systems – in many places 100 or more years old!

 

Government inspection programs have been terribly compromised over many years.  The incredible political pressures to minimize spending on infrastructure have filtered down to the people, procedures and technologies used to examine bridges and other things.  When it comes to bridges it is also important to admit that many aspects of our automobile addiction have raised risks, including enormously greater numbers of vehicles creating heavy traffic during much of the day in urban regions.  Add to this the massive increase in vehicle weight resulting from the incredible increase in monster SUVs, as well as huge increases in large truck traffic.

 

The Minneapolis bridge collapse happened during evening rush hour because that was a period of maximum stress, and that would be the trigger for expanding existing fatigue cracks.  Once fatigue cracks get to critical sizes they grow and propagate very rapidly, producing powerful loads and stresses on remaining steel components and creating what appears to be a virtually instantaneous bridge collapse.

- Advertisement -

 

The remaining public policy question is clear: Will the nation spend what is necessary?  Seven other major bridge collapses in the last 40 years have not done the trick.  Inadequate bridge inspection has been a frequent documented problem, as well as some design defects.  Many people have already died from bridge failures.  But still the nation’s elected officials have not bitten the bullet and agreed to spend trillions of dollars over several decades to bring America’s physical infrastructure up to the most modern standards.

 

Think about all this the next time you go over a bridge.

- Advertisement -

 

http://articlev.wix.com/statusquobuster

Joel S. Hirschhorn is the author of Delusional Democracy - Fixing the Republic Without Overthrowing the Government. His current political writings have been greatly influenced by working as a senior staffer for the U.S. Congress and for the (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Americans Unready to Revolt, Despite Revolting Conditions

Entering a Hospital and On Medicare? The One Question You Must Always Ask

9/11 Truth Manifesto

Tea Party Terrorists

The Most Powerful People in America

Fight Economic Oppression, Target the Top One Percent

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
9 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
Major questions should be asked at this juncture: ... by Jimmy Montague on Thursday, Aug 2, 2007 at 11:32:17 AM
Here in Colo. Springs, a 40' piece of a major ... by Joel S. Hirschhorn on Thursday, Aug 2, 2007 at 11:57:32 AM
that there are still honest engineers left. I have... by Mark Sashine on Thursday, Aug 2, 2007 at 12:20:08 PM
Combine this article with Hightower's recent e... by Kelly James on Thursday, Aug 2, 2007 at 1:11:36 PM
"...the differences between Obama and his riv... by Tony Forest on Thursday, Aug 2, 2007 at 3:22:20 PM
...is merely a symptom of a disease that has been ... by Pappy on Friday, Aug 3, 2007 at 2:21:42 AM
Pappy, Yup, but I'd rather have "the ric... by davy on Friday, Aug 3, 2007 at 3:05:30 AM
All bridges on I-35 and 94 should be checked, imho... by ladybroadoak on Friday, Aug 3, 2007 at 9:48:08 AM
Pappy, Yup, but I'd rather have "the rich" pay the... by Pappy on Friday, Aug 3, 2007 at 11:04:24 PM
the problem with infrastructure is that it is sexy... by Andris on Sunday, Aug 5, 2007 at 9:39:21 PM