Home
Hot NewsEconCrisisObamaElection IntegrityLGBT GayMediaBiz- EconEdgesGovtReligionsLife/ArtsSecurity WMDs Terror
Rights Justice DemocracyHealthVeterans MilitaryTorture GuantanamoFood/FarmingMideast Iran Iraq Afg PaMid East911Eco EnviroActivismCommunity
Refresh   Tag(s):
Add to My Group
September 20, 2006 at 07:48:38

View Ratings | Rate It

Imagine If...

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend
SAVE AS FAVORITE
VIEW FAVORITES

By Joe Plummer (about the author)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Joe Plummer - Writer

Imagine if the government would have come out within a week of the 9/11 attacks and said: "Once again, terrorists placed and detonated bombs in the WTC; only this time, they succeeded in their goal of bringing our towers down."

As proof; imagine they showed us video tape of buildings collapsing at near free-fall speed. Analysts point out explosive squibs 20 stories
beneath the collapse point. They address hard physical evidence like molten metal and completely pulverized concrete. We hear hundreds of first hand accounts from firemen, police, journalists and regular citizens explaining the terrible sounds (and shockwaves) as bombs went off all around them.

Now imagine a "movement" begins that aims to challenge the government's official account. Ignoring all of known history (and all of the available evidence) this movement declares it was "FIRE" not bombs that brought down the buildings.


"It wasn't a controlled demolition" they say, "it was fire!!! The government doesn't want you to know our buildings are vulnerable to fire. They don't want to upgrade our skyscrapers to deal with the risk!!"

Which side of the argument do you think you'd be on? Is it possible those of you who're currently ridiculing the "controlled demolition" evidence would instead be using that same evidence to prove the "fire theory" wrong? How difficult would it be to deal with those ignoring mountains of video, audio, physical and eyewitness evidence in favor of propping up the less plausible explanation? Imagine THAT for a moment. Would you have a hard time understanding how anyone could ignore THIS?

And This

And This

And This

My guess is "yes," you'd have a very hard time understanding how anyone could NOT SEE something so obvious. Something clear to anyone with eyes, ears, common sense...and (as the facts currently stand) a little courage.

 

http://joeplummer.com

Joe Plummer is a man who aims to destroy the Criminal Elite's system of exploitation. When not figuring out ways to do so, he enjoys relaxing in the mountains of New Hampshire with his wife and dogs.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment

 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum