Home
Hot NewsEconCrisisObamaElection IntegrityLGBT GayMediaBiz- EconEdgesGovtReligionsLife/ArtsSecurity WMDs Terror
Rights Justice DemocracyHealthVeterans MilitaryTorture GuantanamoFood/FarmingMideast Iran Iraq Afg PaMid East911Eco EnviroActivismCommunity
Refresh   Tag(s):
Add to My Group
August 11, 2006 at 17:48:30

View Ratings | Rate It

The Three "ifs" of 9/11

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend
SAVE AS FAVORITE
VIEW FAVORITES

By Joe Plummer (about the author)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Joe Plummer - Writer

1. If criminals within our government were involved

2. If we expect to know the truth

3. If defenders of the official account want to be taken seriously



IF corrupt elements within our government allowed or actually assisted the attacks of 9/11, it's imperative for us to know. The security of our nation absolutely depends on it.

IF we expect to find the truth, we can't ignore evidence that falsifies the official theory. For example, if we accept the premise that 19 Arab hijackers were the sole perpetrators of 9/11, we cannot explain what caused the pools of molten metal in WTC 7. That molten metal irrefutably establishes that something other than fire was at work on the steel support columns of the building. Analysis of columns taken from the wreckage has revealed exactly what that "something else" was. It's an incendiary known as thermate. Until we find out who placed and ignited thermate in building 7 (and how they were able to bypass security) we're going to remain miles away from knowing what actually took place on 9/11.

IF those who insist on defending the government's theory want to silence the critics, they've got no choice but to engage in a real "legitimate" debate. The time for name calling and childish ridicule has long since passed. Repeating the word "whack job" or "moonbat" simply isn't working anymore. It does nothing to make the evidence surrounding WTC 7 (or any of the other evidence for that matter) go away.

Scientists, engineers, physics professors, doctors, lawyers, and of course ordinary American citizens make up the roughly 80 million people in this country who, according to a recent poll, now openly suspect government complicity. Unless defenders of the official theory can muster some valid well reasoned arguments; arguments that account for molten metal and thermate for instance, you can rest assured the outrage and demands for a new and truly independent investigation will soon be insurmountable. -I personally can hardly wait for that day. I suspect it's close at hand.

 

http://joeplummer.com

Joe Plummer is a man who aims to destroy the Criminal Elite's system of exploitation. When not figuring out ways to do so, he enjoys relaxing in the mountains of New Hampshire with his wife and dogs.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment

 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum