Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (1 comment)

RICH AS ROCKEFELLER NOT NEARLY RICH ENOUGH

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com


October 23, 2007
Companies Seeking Immunity Donate to Senator

WASHINGTON, Oct. 22 — Executives at the two biggest phone companies contributed more than $42,000 in political donations to Senator John D. Rockefeller IV this year while seeking his support for legal immunity for businesses participating in National Security Agency eavesdropping.

The surge in contributions came from a Who’s Who of executives at the companies, AT&T and Verizon, starting with the chief executives and including at least 50 executives and lawyers at the two utilities, according to campaign finance reports.

The money came primarily from a fund-raiser that Verizon held for Mr. Rockefeller in March in New York and another that AT&T sponsored for him in May in San Antonio.

Mr. Rockefeller, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, emerged last week as the most important supporter of immunity in devising a compromise plan with Senate Republicans and the Bush administration.

A measure approved by the intelligence panel on Thursday would add restrictions on the eavesdropping and extend retroactive immunity to carriers that participated in it. President Bush secretly approved the program after the Sept. 11 attacks.

Mr. Rockefeller’s office said Monday that the sharp increases in contributions from the telecommunications executives had no influence on his support for the immunity provision.

--more--

_______________________________________________________________

There goes the last argument about separating money and influence. You don't get much wealthier than the great-grandson of John D. and he's still a pimp for money. What's the charge for getting Rockefeller in bed?

A chickenshit 42 grand.

This makes me as angry as anything I have read in this past over-angering year of politics. The scion of one of the nation's wealthiest families guttered in the payoff trough with the likes of Randy Cunningham and Jack Abramoff. Never enough, is there John?
Then John D's outrageously unapologetic office staff offers the 'stick-it-in-your-ear' offense to human intelligence that 'the sharp increases in contributions from the telecommunications executives had no influence on his support.'

Larry Craig is being literally as well as figuratively stripped of honor over his ridiculous overture in a men's room, while John D. Rockefeller, IV sells out his constituency for however many pieces of silver $42 grand amounts to.

The chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee insults the intelligence of the American people by whoring his office to the highest bidder. "The hundred bucks you left on the nightstand had no influence on the quality of the sex, honey."

John, you are a thief of the people's trust--there is no other word for it.


* For more in-depth articles by Jim on Washington at Work, check out Opinion-Columns.com

 

www.opinion-columns.com, http://politicalcrank.blogspot.com/

Jim Freeman's op-ed pieces and commentaries have appeared in The New York Times, Chicago Tribune, International Herald-Tribune, CNN, The New York Review, The Jon Stewart Daily Show and a number of magazines.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

So? by amazin on Friday, Oct 26, 2007 at 2:03:28 AM