Tags for This Article:

Energy (453)  Oil Policy (321)  Energy (235)  Energy (230)  War For Oil (210)  Oil Demand Supply (172)  Oil Crisis Global Disruption (136)  Corporations Oil (93)  Energy Peak Oil (80)  Subsidies (53)  Energy Ethanol (30) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
September 30, 2007 at 16:14:31

Classic Case of Feeding a Dog that Won't Hunt

by Jim Freeman     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com


Tell A Friend

Sudden Surplus Arises as Threat to Ethanol Boom

NEVADA, Iowa, Sept. 24 — The ethanol boom of recent years — which spurred a frenzy of distillery construction, record corn prices, rising food prices and hopes of a new future for rural America — may be fading.

Only last year, farmers here spoke of a biofuel gold rush, and they rejoiced as prices for ethanol and the corn used to produce it set records.

But companies and farm cooperatives have built so many distilleries so quickly that the ethanol market is suddenly plagued by a glut, in part because the means to distribute it has not kept pace. The average national ethanol price on the spot market has plunged 30 percent since May, with the decline escalating sharply in the last few weeks.

“The end of the ethanol boom is possibly in sight and may already be here,” said Neil E. Harl, an economics professor emeritus at Iowa State University who lectures on ethanol and is a consultant for producers. “This is a dangerous time for people who are making investments.”

--more--

_______________________________________________________________

In a politically rather than market-driven 'mandate from Congress' to produce ethanol, who would possibly be a worse choice than farmers and new-to-the-game distillers? Farmers are the nation's worst businessmen, reliant on more subsidies than the French farmer Europe loves to hate. In-for-the-quick-buck distillers can't figure out how to get a product to market.

Has someone closed the railroads when I wasn't paying attention?

Big Oil must be chuckling in its Board rooms. The flaw in Congress's magnificent gesture was to ignore Big Oil (not a mistake Washington often makes). Big Oil might have jumped with both feet on another energy market to dominate, especially one with a subsidy.

Big Oil knows how to produce (distill in this case), transport and market. Big Oil would have given ethanol a premium location at the pumps (presuming profit was there) and allied themselves with Cargill and the other Ag Giants that dominate the corn market. Big Oil would have leveraged their oil contracts, used ethanol to leverage them further and (at their pace) eased us from our dependence on crude.

A crude solution and one that extends Big Oil's control of the energy market, but it would have worked. If we are serious about energy independence, that's the way it will have to play out.

 

Jim Freeman's op-ed pieces and commentaries have appeared in The New York Times, Chicago Tribune, International Herald-Tribune, CNN, The New York Review, The Jon Stewart Daily Show and a number of magazines.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Spurl      Tag!RawSugar      Shadows Tag!      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments

Hater of Nazis above all. Hobbies include activism, military model building, military history, exciting and vital conversation with retired crooks. Retired
John HanksHater of Nazis above all. Hobbies include activism, military model building, military history, exciting and vital conversation with retired crooks. Retired

Slavery til now.

All agri-business cons have been dogs that run in circles.  They have all been money pits.  The longer and more ridiculous the hunt, the better.  Illegal immigration anyone?  Farm subsidies anyone?  Tobacco anyone?

by John Hanks (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 789 comments) on Monday, October 1, 2007 at 9:35:13 AM
 


57Yo m I'm a "been there, done that! Bought the tee shirt,to hide the scars!" type of person Ive worked�many jobs from�a chicken slaughterer to managing a branch of a multinational and many jobs in between.Raised in colonial PNG Left School 16,Grad Hi school 22 Night School, University 36� BBus (majored in Psyche and Marketing), Dip Comp prog and project Mmnt.at 50 I've been in 48 different community org ,23 on board with 18 prez or deputy prez.First social campaign at 17 for the aborigine...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Andris57Yo m I'm a "been there, done that! Bought the tee shirt,to hide the scars!" type of person Ive worked�many jobs from�a chicken slaughterer to managing a branch of a multinational and many jobs in between.Raised in colonial PNG Left School 16,Grad Hi school 22 Night School, University 36� BBus (majored in Psyche and Marketing), Dip Comp prog and project Mmnt.at 50 I've been in 48 different community org ,23 on board with 18 prez or deputy prez.First social campaign at 17 for the aborigine...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Corporatism ethanol policy or is more money policy

The wild card in all this is the secondary reason for the need for ethanol…Climate change….remember that? Climate change will bring two relevant changes here that will make much of the current problem irrelevant.  

  1. Climate change it’s self. Changed rain patterns, unpredictably wild weather or lengthy droughts means reduces crops.
  2. Whole growing areas will be wiped out.
  3. Greater population means that what corn there is will be for food.
i.e. Much of Australia’s wheat belt is under the worst drought on record now. Mighty river systems that once had paddle steamers are now dry.  Production and the means are plummeting. Ethanol is at best a short term solution. I am unable to see under US Corporation capitalism the outcome would have been much different. What was needed was a more considered planned approach (patronage). Because of the undue influence of Corporations neither good governance nor capitalist theory are/were applied.

by Andris (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 532 comments) on Monday, October 1, 2007 at 9:20:03 PM
 


Jim Freeman's op-ed pieces and commentaries have appeared in The New York Times, Chicago Tribune, International Herald-Tribune, CNN, The New York Review, The Jon Stewart Daily Show and a number of magazines.
Jim FreemanJim Freeman's op-ed pieces and commentaries have appeared in The New York Times, Chicago Tribune, International Herald-Tribune, CNN, The New York Review, The Jon Stewart Daily Show and a number of magazines.

You may well be right

But I'm a pragmatist. The game at present has rules. We can whine about the rules, try to change the rules or make the rules work for what we're trying to get done.

I'd settle (at the moment) for making ethanol work while we get better systems in place. To argue that climate change will wreck corn and therefore ethanol isn't worth the chase is to throw in the sponge.

Big Business uses us unmercifully--I don't see any problem with making it serve our needs for a change and that means shifting profit from what we don't see as useful (airlines, fossil fuels, crap schools) to things we do value.

 

by Jim Freeman (107 articles, 40 quicklinks, 150 diaries, 326 comments) on Tuesday, October 2, 2007 at 8:57:31 AM
 

 

3 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

 

 

 

 

Articles
Diaries Members
Products Events
Polls  
  

Articles Popularity:

Momentum Building For Bugliosi's Case Against George W. Bush For Murder
by Linda Milazzo

Bush Fulfills His Grandfather's Dream
by David Swanson

A Declaration of Independence from the Government of the United States
by Anonymous

The Perfect Storm from Hell
by Lord Stirling

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN GAS REACHES 7 DOLLARS A GALLON ?
by Allen L Roland

Fortis Prediction of US Bank Meltdown a Net Hoax: The Making of an Urban Legend
by Paul Haughey

POW/MIA Families Alleged McCain Assault: Senate Ethics Committee Failed to Investigate
by elliot cohen

Why were 'first responders' de-contaminated at the Pentagon?
by Len Hart

Ex Weapons Inspector: Iran Not Pursuing Nukes, But U.S. Will Attack Before '09
by Jason Leopold

Raw milk and the government/corporate effort to crush it
by Linn Cohen-Cole