![]() |
|
|
March 27, 2008 at 01:17:52
Frontline's "Bush's War": A Total Failure, Propaganda, and White-Wash by jibbguy Page 1 of 1 page(s) |
|
|
The recent PBS two-night offering of Frontline was utterly depressing to watch. Not for its subject matter; but for the constant reminders that PBS and Frontline, formerly the last bastion of free speech on U.S. mainstream media, has sadly become just another corporate and Bush regime mouthpiece. The documentary was little more than a Bush propaganda piece that lied, dissembled, diverted, and ignored its way through this crucial subject for the entire excruciatingly painful four and half hours. There were more lies and half-truths in it than I could tabulate accurately (…lost count at about 40); and the information that was presented was tilted, intended to divert attention, and inaccurate to such a degree that the producer’s credit should have read “Karl Rove”. Starting with the events of 9/11; where Bush’s activities that day were not even mentioned, it went downhill from there. All through the piece there were constant and blatant attempts to move ALL the blame for every bad decision on those already given up by the White House as sacrificial lambs: Tenet, Bremmer, various Generals, Powell, and of course Rumpsfelt…. To watch this soap-opera drama one would think that there were NO decisions being made at the top, and “Daddy” and “Mommy” (Bush and Cheney) were off doing adult things, while their silly wayward children wrecked everything. Perhaps the most amusing part was the attempt to make Secretary Rice look like the hero of the piece… Battling “Rummy” and championing a “superior” plan of action for our military in Iraq! It would be funny except that this is PBS we are talking about. Another absurd re-occurring theme was the suggestion, made at least three times, that the administration was always trying to “get us out” of Iraq, always trying but somehow being thwarted by events (…of course the story did not mention that those unfortunate events that “stopped us from withdrawing” were caused by the administration’s policies in the first place)…. Utter, inane, nonsense. There was no serious criticism of the President, no hard look at the so-called “bad decisions” that got us into this horrible mess, no talking heads that were anything but apologetic… In fact the events were mainly presented as “inevitable” and therefore excusable... And ALWAYS the fault of people who have left the administration. This piece of naked propaganda is merely a whitewashed look at those in power, not a true piece of journalism… where we are led to believe that most of these extremely horrible decisions, such as “De-Bathe-ification,” and the dissolving of the Iraqi army, were “rogue” decisions that the White House did not even know about in advance!
Are we expected to be this stupid, to believe these vacuous lies, these absurd attempts to protect Bush and Cheney from blame? No one ever in positions of power in history could be so mis-informed, so ignorant, so at a loss… Yet we are led to believe that the path taken at every turn was not deliberately designed to widen and escalate the war, cause more and more deaths, and insure that our military presence was “required” indefinitely.
No, I do not believe we are really expected to believe it, because it doesn’t matter anyway. They have the power, the power to squash the Press and any meaningful dissent. And they are using that power. The power to take-over and control PBS… To use it as just another mouthpiece for propaganda and lies… A high-brow version of the Rush Limbaugh show. What we think doesn’t matter, because they have the microphone.
It is time that we, all of us who have donated to PBS over the years in the hope of having at least one source of decent television, decide that this is too much. At least until the political control is removed, I suggest that our funding stop dead! Then the corporate legions can just pay for it all themselves: After all, they seem to be the ones benefiting most from it now. Because to support such lying propaganda is helping our enemies; those who are the true Enemy of the People, those who control mainstream media and now PBS as well, who hide the truth and ignore the most important stories: Those who view us with distain and derision as suckers to be fed garbage instead of real information.
I never thought I would say this; my shelf is full of old coffee mugs emblazoned with the PBS logo… But this organization is obviously no longer worth our support, or our patience. When the Bush regime is given open, unapologetic propaganda on Frontline… the PBS cause is hopeless. And there can be no mistaking the message: We must rely only on ourselves; on the Internet and the foreign press for information. It is much better to give money to sites such as Op-Ed News… Send our support to independent journalists like Greg Palast and Bill Moyers… Give to the many others whose souls are not bought and sold yet; whom we can actually trust to present news and commentary honestly. For they deserve our succor, our praise, and our funds. PBS, as proved by their actions, no longer does.
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
|
|
|
|
| 8 comments |
|
PBS
One could also argue that PBS needs to ween itself totally from government support and needs yours more than ever. It's not likely they will, though. by Maxwell (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 409 comments [85 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:48:51 AM
|
|
I might agree...
...If there was any hope of them changing back to being independant. I suspect if that was tried, there would be insurmountable problems suddenly placed in PBS' path... Such as FCC licences, or the immediate disappearance of the big foundation grants which fund most of it's content aquisition and new production costs ;) You see, there cannot be room for a questioning media in this model that we have now. So if there was a "danger" of a dissenting PBS, then it would have to be squashed at all costs. Would you trust our current Congress to do anything to help restore PBS to being independant (..other than a few like Kucinich)? The sad fact is, control of MSM, and PBS as a part of that, serves the current Congressional leaders' purposes too.... by Steve Windisch (jibbguy) (17 articles, 0 quicklinks, 4 diaries, 360 comments [54 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:24:21 PM
|
|
PBS has succumed
I agree with the author's characterization and the previous commenter's assessments after watching this 4 hour defense and deflection of responsibility for the Iraq War tragedy. PBS has morphed into another pretentious outlet of the MSM, paid for and now pandering to our corporate government. For more indie news http://www.linktv.org/ Directv Ch375. by Heretic616 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 7 comments) on Thursday, Mar 27, 2008 at 3:06:52 PM
|
|
Typical Liberal's View
One word sums up your view, Moron by David Tapscott (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 6 comments [3 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:45:05 PM
|
|
Gill-Scott Heron
"The Revolution Will Not Be Televised" - how prophetic this song is. I gave-up TV this month, am having some minor with-drawls with C-SPAN, which I can learn to get on the net or radio, other than that most everything else I don't miss. 90% is crap you don't need to know and the other 10% can't be believed. by Mr M (8 articles, 0 quicklinks, 66 diaries, 2845 comments [654 recommended, 27 rejected]) on Friday, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:51:05 AM
|
|
Additional info for you Mr. jibbguy
http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2008/03/24/bushs-war-and-our-own/ "Bush's War," notably, comes at a point where the administration has again called for public television's budget to be slashed. If the best defense truly is a good offense, then nothing could endorse the service more powerfully than this sobering documentary -- a genre that finds little toehold within the current primordial ooze of broadcast TV journalism. Have a Nice Day! by David Tapscott (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 6 comments [3 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:07:18 AM
|
|
Thx for the link ;)
There can be at least two takes on this documentary: A) That the ppl at Frontline tried to sneak in some honest commentary here and there, or B) they just made the whole thing as palatable to the tastes of the adminstration as they dared (...no easy task considering how hideously bad the whole thing smells). Obviously i am siding with the latter view (B). Which damns PBS and Frontline as mere propagandists. I am willing to admit, that they prolly have a quota of pro-Bush episodes to do, and this was one of them. But in my mind, that is no excuse. Let's hear some debate points on the first view, or another view, if you disagree. Thats what these "comments" are best for. I love a good debate ;) ... Or lets debate this instead: The U.S. Mainstream Media is under tight concerted control by unseen forces that keep highly important stories from the People's view, and try their best to steer elections.... Even to the point of soviet-style "disappearing" reform candidates that pose a danger, like Paul or Kucinich. And that having this tight control is an absolute requirement for instituting a fascist tyranny. by Steve Windisch (jibbguy) (17 articles, 0 quicklinks, 4 diaries, 360 comments [54 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Mar 28, 2008 at 8:45:13 AM
|
|
Funding...
Only about 15 % of funding for the CPB, Corporation for Public Broadcasting, actually comes from the federal government any more. The Republicans have been slashing away since the Reagan years. GWB proposes to cut even that slim amount. Unfortunately the management of CPB has been held by corporate interests for quite awhile. The Frontline offering on Monday and Tuesday was totally pathetic. I kept waiting to hear from people who had actually had the courage to stand up to the Administration and say "NO". Where were the interviews of Congresswoman Barbara Lee or Senator Robert Byrd or Congressman Dennis Kucinich? All of those interviewed, except for a couple of writers, were Bush Administration insiders. I have to say that although I have support PBS and NPR for more years than I care to count, I know that it will be many years before I send any more money as it doesn't appear that CPB/PBS actually listen to their listeners/viewers any more... They are busy scrounging for dollars from major corporations and foundations. by paz love (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 71 comments) on Saturday, Mar 29, 2008 at 2:31:45 AM
|
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |