OpEdNews Op Eds

Rather Than Impeach, Dems Setting Themselves Up to be Blamed for

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Jay Janson     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 1723
Become a Fan
  (45 fans)
- Advertisement -

For those of us, who have interested ourselves in the working nature
of our government, and understand that our U.S.A. has been under
corporate governance for some time now, it has become obvious that
the Democratic leadership, presently enjoying its congressional
majority position by virtue of the anti-war vote, and feeling citizen
pressure to end the war, knows what is expected of itself from
corporate governance, namely:

'MAKE IT LOOK GOOD, ROCK THE BOAT, BUT DON'T TURN THE SHIP AROUND,
AND DON'T MUTINY AND ARREST OUR/YOUR CAPTAIN.

These parameters of expected political positions, decisions and
actions are understood almost by osmosis among collaborating
individuals, the tenor of the opinions and judgments of a publicly
unobserved power elite, represented by profit inebriated high flying
investment concilieri quite desperately powered forward by
institutionalized greed, and slyly enmeshed in the absurdly
unscientific and immoral choices of quasi regal coteries of the
chosen privileged insiders, less than mental giants, of the
Trilateral Commission and Council on Foreign Relations, who are privy
to otherwise secret CIA illegal machinations of criminal intent. In
short, the ongoing blind global financial conspiracy against mankind,
with U.S. financial force leading and the world in tow, permeates our
political process.

One can see the Dems 'making it look good', and taking in most of us
TV viewers, with a good show of pretending to rock the industrial
complex military boat, while marginalizing to zero any impeachment
talk.

We witness this pretense of representing the citizenry's desire for
peace, this ever so modest criticism of the industrial complex's
continuing plans for imperial war, with nary a mention of the human
destruction of yet another ancient civilization's descendent
population, wrought by our constantly hailed and praised beloved
military.

But even with this necessarily modest anti-war stance, there is
already a recognizable funny smell in the air. Seems that old 'lack
of patriotism' stew is already being cooked up. The simmering
ingredients, that will later be boiling over, are those familiar
cries:

'They were weak hearted and that's why America lost in ........!'
(enter name of country)
'America could have won but the troops were not supported!'
'The war effort was betrayed in the streets at home by unpatriotic
critics of their own country!'
"The Democratic Party riddled with Liberals didn't have the stomach
to stay the course."
"They Sabotaged our brave boys over there."

Can it be that simple, for corporate governance's CEO interwoven and
interlaced smooth semi-automatic functioning conglomerate media to
get across the only possible election theme that could keep the White
House Republican?
- Advertisement -


Sure! With an electorate superbly undereducated, solidly anchored
into a self-indulgent life style with little regard for citizen
responsibility for what our government does with our military and CIA
in third world nations, it will be easy to push confusion over what
is patriotism, and what is to be feared, on those boring prime time
panel discussions with network 'experts' and important public figures
holding forth about 'American', (read corporate), interests in this
or that 'crucial' region having been endangered by the Democrat's
irresolution

Consider the history of the G.O.P., with corporate media assistance,
accusing the Democrats of betraying America.

1949 - 'They lost China to the reds', those Democrat administrations
full of Roosevelt's leftist advisors.' (as if China was forever
'ours' by dint of our role with the other colonial powers in
suppressing the Boxer Rebellion of 1900.)

1952 - 'They tied MacArthur's hands! Wouldn't let him bomb China,
then blamed him for the stalemated Korean War.' (A few
thermonuclearized Chinese cities and we could have saved North Korea,
what was left of it, for capitalism and freedom - even made test runs
for dropping an A-bomb on North Korea, but chickened out, never did.)

1974 - the Democratic majority in Congress passed the Foreign
Assistance Act of 1974, which cut off all military funding. 'They
betrayed our troops in Vietnam and hippies spat on them when they
came home!' (We could have "bombed them back to the stone age" went
the saying. Our boys could have wiped out another couple of million
of these rice farming commies and avoided the loss of face in losing
to a tiny poor ex-French Indochinese agrarian colony)
- Advertisement -


2008 ? CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, and Fox will have been showing for five
years, selected wounded and maimed soldiers itching to go back to
Iraq to protect our nation from another 9/11, working up public
dismay that their pain and the supreme sacrifice of their fallen
buddies will have been for inconclusive results. (Those disabled vets
who are pissed off for having gotten hurt in a war now called a
mistake will never be seen on camera.)

As long as there is war, it matters little which party is in office.
We had three Democrat presidents and three Republican presidents
overseeing the decades long millions in body count crucifixion of the
Indochinese peninsula. Doesn't matter to the public, doesn't matter
to the enemy, and doesn't matter to the master corporate governance
power centers.

In fact, in the lead up to election day in 2004, one felt that the
invisible power behind the throne, as nefariously represented in
places like the low profiled Council on Foreign Relations and
Trilateral Commission, and the careful to be unnoticed influence of
those certain prominent well established ol' boy families of modern
American history, had accepted that the bar had been pushed far
enough by the Bush administration, and that 'everyone who is anyone'
was comfortable with changing over to governing through the other
private capitalist party led by a understanding, reassuring and
compliant John Kerry.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

http://prosecuteuscrimesagainsthumanitynow.blogspot.com
Jay Janson is an archival research peoples historian activist, musician and writer; has lived and worked on all continents; articles on media published in China, Italy, UK, India and the US; now resides in NYC; First effort was a series of articles (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

What Tony Bennett Said About 9/11 Martin Luther King Jr. Would Have Also

Girlfriends? Petraeus Oversaw the Slaughter of Thousands and He Will Face Trial:

Demonic David Rockefeller Fiends Dulles Kissinger Brzezinski - Investor Wars Korea thru Syria

U.S. Threat to Atom Bomb North Korea Never Forgotten

NINE BRUTAL DISAPPOINTMENTS FOR US OBAMA FANS