OpEdNews Op Eds

Jimmy Carter's Right! Presidents Should Not be Liars.

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Jay Diamond
May 13, 2008
This morning, Jimmy Carter has written a post on the Washington Post's "On Faith" blog entitled "Presidents Should Not be Liars".
The most glaring, destructive, and disgusting lie invented and maintained by the handlers of George W. Bush is their manifestly false insistence that the attack on, and occupation of Iraq is of material importance to the security of the United States.
As in every other instance with this administration, the prime consideration...or the ONLY consideration with respect to policy has been the calculation of the political potential in any situation.
Why this is not written or spoken about more in the press and on radio and television is an enduring mystery and a monumental failure of "commentators".
Mark me well....Bush et al did Iraq for no other reason than to bring about an historic 2004 landslide for Dubya.
They DID think it would be easy and that it would be over in 3 weeks, and they DID think that all the American soldiers would be home by Christmas 2003.
None other than Sean Hannity indicated this to me in a phone conversation in February 2003.  In answer to my skepticism about the impending attack, he said that he was regularly in touch with people "at the top" (likely Rove, since Hannity's program is a reliable transcript of Rove "information") and that they assured him that it was a done deal that the main fighting would be all over before three weeks, and that the troops would be back by Christmas that year.
This is a fact, though Hannity will likely deny it.  It is, however, the blunt truth.
But even if this corroboration had not taken place, it is clear to me that Bush's political wing, which had sway over everything he did, also was pre-eminent in the planning of the attack and occupation of Iraq.
The point was to bulldoze low-information voters into seeing Bush as having avenged 9/11, and thereby to bring about an historic landslide in 2004 which would have given Bush the "political capital" to truly advance his domestic agenda of rolling back the New Deal. 
Bear in mind, his first initiative after "re-election" was to vainly attempt to privatize, ie, END, Social Security.  Well, if he had actually had the "political capital" he bragged about after barely squeaking by on election day 2004 by less than 2% ( the lowest re-election percentage by any president since Woodrow Wilson in 1916)he probably would have succeeded in castrating Social Security, and would have gone into Republican history (as opposed to actual history) as the man who redressed the "evil socialist" New Deal, and thereby restored "freedom" to America.
Bottom line: Bush knew Iraq had zero to do with the security of the United States.  And Bush also knew that a quick kill in Iraq would trick huge numbers of uninformed voters into thinking he had saved them and saved the USA.
EVERY single US soldier, AND every single Iraqi civilian who has been killed since March 20, 2003, died because they were sacrificed to Karl Rove's "re-election" strategy for Bush in 2004.
Nothing else.
So God Bless Jimmy Carter. 
And for that matter, I leave Bush to heaven and the merciful providence he purports to believe in.


 

 

Jay Diamond is a progressive activist, media critic, and radio commentator.
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Talk Radio is a Cancerous Blight on the Nation; Not "Entertainment".

WHY THE FANATIC RIGHT WILL WIN !

Calculated Political Lies Are Violence !

How Talk Radio Plays the GOP for Chumps

WHY TAXES ARE SUCH A POTENT ISSUE

Congressman Peter King's War on American Health....An Open Letter

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

LBJ, Nixon, Reagan, Bush I and II, and the Clinton... by John Hanks on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 7:20:59 PM
  I agree the ones you named ,are what they a... by GUY P. FRASER on Wednesday, May 14, 2008 at 8:40:43 AM