Tags for This Article:

Military (3106)  Iraq (1170)  World Issues (1029)  Future (852)  Kucinich-Dennis (507)  Constitution In Crisis (483)  Iraq War Funding (417)  Presidential Primary Elections (272)  National Debt -Trade Deficit (252)  Campaign Finance And Reform (202)  Campaign Advertising (127)  Globalization NAFTA (115)  Spending Priorities (51) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
January 14, 2008 at 16:32:29

Promoted to column top on 1/14/08:
Campaign 2008: The world's strangest debate -- where only one side gets to speak

by Jane Stillwater     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

Imagine that you have a teenage daughter -- it's a stretch, I know, but bear with me. Then imagine that your teenage daughter is on her high school debate team.

"Mom," says your adolescent progeny, "next week we are going to debate about NAFTA. Me and Amanda and Justin will be taking the opposition point of view -- that NAFTA is a bad thing. We need to come up with reasons why the U.S. should get out of NAFTA."



You are aware that NAFTA is a really important issue and you are all excited and pleased that she even knows what it is -- let alone that she will actually be studying up on the subject. "NAFTA is taking away too many American jobs," you tell her, "and I'm glad to hear that such an important issue is being discussed." Then you hand her an article from the Berkeley Daily Planet about the dangers of globalization and start making plans to take a few hours off work to go watch the debate.

"The U.S. government from the Reagan administration on," states the BDP article, "has provided subsidies to major industries to move to low-wage areas, and produced agreements in many countries for establishing export production zones - that is, zones in which production is only for export; they add little to the local host economies, and create international assembly lines whose only coherence is the multi-national corporate structure that controls it. The effect of this process has been to gut the industrial base of the U.S. economy." That's news the debate team can use!

"The subsidiary internal effect," the article continues, "was that the military, the one industry that could not run away because it was strategic, gained economic hegemony by default. The U.S. economy fell into the hands of the military-industrial complex." That's a great argument against NAFTA. It has left us with only one major industry -- killing, murder and death. How can you argue against that one? You can't. Now your offspring is good to go.

The day of the big debate arrives. You, the proud parent, go find a seat in the front row -- but then you can't spot your daughter! However, just as you are starting to panic, her teacher steps onto the stage of the cafetorium and announces, "We have a nice surprise for you. This NAFTA debate will be broadcast on national television!" You get all excited! Your daughter is going to be on ABC, NBC and Fox News -- live! You beam with motherly pride.

But then what the teacher says next absolutely floors you. "The side that is debating pro-NAFTA will be broadcast live onstage from here. But the side debating against NAFTA will have to debate from the school parking lot. And with no cameras at all." What! And they call this a DEBATE? I don't think so.

But wait. It gets worse. The week after that, the same thing happens again, when the topic is the effect of war on the American economy. "Can the U.S. military afford to stay in Iraq?" Once again the side supporting spending trillions of dollars on war gets to debate on national television but the opposing side -- the one that debates that we should spend that money more wisely or that we don't have that amount of money to spend at all -- is once again stuck in the parking lot.

Your daughter quotes the Berkeley Daily Planet again. "The Army burned 40 million gallons of fuel in three weeks of combat in Iraq, or almost two million gallons per day, an amount equivalent to the gasoline consumed by all Allied armies combined during the four years of World War I." She states that the U.S. military is the largest user of petroleum in the world and for this reason alone America cannot afford to keep up funding its various wars. But to no avail. No one is listening to Amanda and Justin and your daughter who are way out in the freaking parking lot. Everyone -- except for you, the Mom -- is back in the cafetorium where it's warm and comfortable and they can be on TV.

Your daughter gets very discouraged. And she learns a very unwanted lesson -- that when the side in the parking lot continually losses the debates because the judges are in the school cafetorium with the TV cameras and no one is out in the parking lot, then it's not really a debate at all. And you complain to the school board but to no avail. The networks are paying them for use of the cafetorium. Choose between money and truth? Which do you think they will choose?

So. Where am I going with this little parable? You know where -- the 2008 presidential primary debates. How can they actually even be called "debates" when the basic issue they are debating is so critically important to the very existance of our country if not to our planet -- whether or not globalized mega-corporations own America outright or whether "We the People" are still in the game -- but yet despite the crucial importance of this issue to everything we hold dear, the debaters who represent the mega-corporations parade themselves time after time in front of ABC, NBC and Fox News and get their say ad nausea -- while the critically crucial interests of the American people, the American economy, democracy and the U.S. Constitution are all out in the parking lot getting cold.

PS: What would I recommend that the American people do to protect their own interests? That's a no-brainer! Let's all put on our jackets and coats and go out into the parking lot too. Let's listen to the other side of the story, OUR side of the debate. We will be glad that we did -- and so will our children and grandchildren. And then my next recommendation? Vote for Dennis Kucinich, of course!

 

Stillwater is a freelance writer who hates injustice and corruption in any form but especially injustice and corruption paid for by American taxpayers. She has recently published a book entitled, "Bring Your Own Flak Jacket: Helpful Tips For Touring Today's Middle East". According to Ms. Stillwater, "It's a fabulous and entertaining book. I loved writing it. And I hope that you will love reading it too." It's available at http://www.amazon.com/Bring-Your-Own-Flak-Jacket/dp/0978615719 or you can special order it at any independent bookstore.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments

A bit of an old hippy and activist
Judy RamseyA bit of an old hippy and activist

Jane

You are the bomb!  Great analogy, now how do we get the parents to the parking lot?  Are they more concerned with buying the tennis shoes, or what they will be inheriting?  Dennis is the ONLY choice for people who care about the next generation!

by Judy Ramsey (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 82 comments) on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 at 9:37:22 AM
 


I am a retired civil servant. I was an electronics technician.
BarkerI am a retired civil servant. I was an electronics technician.

I agree

 

As a conservative, I support free enterprise.   I oppose Socialism and Facism.  The current Republican Party favors enterprise, for the few, not the public.  I support the right of every citizen of the world to live as they choose.  I support the right of every worker in the world to incorporate.

I agree that President Bush supports Facism.  I agree that the illegal wars violate the Constitution.

What I wish is for everyone to run their own business.  Leftists argue that corporations produce wealth, so if we make everone a corporation people will be wealthy.

 

by Barker (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 120 comments) on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 at 12:44:17 PM
 


I am a retired opera singer. I was a leading soprano with the New York City Opera for ten years. I am a strong supporter of Dennis Kucinich and worked for his campaign in 2004. I believe that he is the ONLY honest man in congress. He has been working against this insane war since before it began. I am 72 years old and I have been so frustrated with the media, the Congress and the American people that they don't tell the truth.
CaronomeI am a retired opera singer. I was a leading soprano with the New York City Opera for ten years. I am a strong supporter of Dennis Kucinich and worked for his campaign in 2004. I believe that he is the ONLY honest man in congress. He has been working against this insane war since before it began. I am 72 years old and I have been so frustrated with the media, the Congress and the American people that they don't tell the truth.

How to punish NBC for their decision.

I have already written an email to MSNBC telling them that my family, friends and I will boycott NBC, MSNBC and all GE products if they lock out Dennis Kucinich from this debate.

There is no debate without him. If he is not there the "three top candidates" will all regurgitate the same pap on all of the subjects they are allowed to discuss. They will not talk about the war and ending it immediately; they will certainly not talk about impeachment; they will not talk about NAFTA and the WTO and ending both of them; they will not talk about a not for profit (Medicare for All) health care plan which will cover every person in the country; they will talk about the economy and how they have the answer for all of the problems that we face.

These are all of the questions that Dennis will answer if he is allowed to speak. But I am fearful that Tim Russert and Brian Williams will not let him speak even if he is there. They have their instructions and they obey them very well as we have seen in the other debates that included Dennis. They, after all, work for the GE and they have to safeguard their positions. But wouldn't it be wonderful if somebody would stand up and be strong enough to actually speak the truth about this issue and let Dennis Kucinich have the floor.

 The American people are being duped. The best candidate is being silenced in these debates. When Dennis has an audience in front of him who can listen to what he says, that audience is spellbound by his passion and truth and brilliance.

 Pay attention, people, and you will see that Dennis can win if we who know what he is about will vote for him. It's only the future of the country and the world at stake.

by Caronome (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 237 comments) on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 at 1:58:41 PM
 

 

4 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Keith Olbermann Broke Up With Me! by Shannyn Moore

Special Message for Tibetans Living In and Outside of Tibet Posted by Stephen Fox

Study Confirms Genetically Modified Crops Threaten Human Fertility and Health Safety Posted by sadelaine

SO SAY THE BANKERS: Learn to Love the 'AMERO' by Patrick Henningsen

Getting Through the Coming Depression by Bernard Weiner

Children dying in Haiti, victims of food crisis exacerbated by four devastating tropical storms Posted by Stephen Fox

Kucinich is Still Rockin' My World Toward Peace by Meryl Ann Butler

Tim Robbins: An Open Letter to the New York City Board of Elections by Tim Robbins

Obama is Already Stirring Controversy by The Old Codger

Senate testimony by police captain reveals 9 sticks of missing dynamite in 'Omaha Two' bombing case by Michael Richardson

Go To Top 50 Most Popular