Tag(s): ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (1 comment)

I've heard JFK, and Mitt, you're no JFK

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (1 fan)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

I've heard JFK, and Mitt, you're no JFK

Readers,

I listened today to the recording of JFK making his famous speech about the question of his religious faith. His being the first Roman Catholic presidential candidate had become a "millstone" around his campaign's neck.

I also listened to Mitt Romney make his seemingly parallel speech about his Mormonism, which has also become like a millstone around Romney's neck, or would one of Joseph Smith's golden tablets make a better comparison. And parallel is the right word as neither speech intersects even remotely.

Don't be fooled by Romney's verbal smokescreen that claims he and the rest of us share a moral inheritance based on religious faith.

I and many millions of fellow atheists are able to function quiet well and even better than many Americans who claim to be "washed in the blood of the lamb" or "reborn unto the faith." Statistics have shown that atheists, freethinkers, and agnostics have a better track record with avoiding divorce and drug/substance abuse, and staying out of jail. Their personal lives are calmer and more productive.

These facts were deliberately ignored in Romney's speech. Instead Romney refers to nearly every imaginable faith tradition in America except for the Snake Handlers! They must not be making a significant portion of the voting public!

By the starkest verbal contrast imaginable President Kennedy speaks of the right to attend church, or NOT to attend church. He elaborates that he would work for an elimination of the divisiveness caused by virulent religious differences and refers to history to prove his point.

President Kennedy said clearly in his speech that the separation of church and state is "absolute."

Mr. Romney on the other hand claims that religion is essential to the future of the United States as it is our birthright as a nation.

The Romney campaign is intentionally refusing to read the First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.... Or Article VI: ...no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

You can listen for yourself to the time capsule of Kennedy's speech and Romney's doggerel attempts to spin his superstition as essential to the human good by going to this NPR link.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId= 16970082 or

http://tinyurl.com/2fzxxz

 

http://apollosbrain.blogspot.com/

James Nimmo is active in progressive issues and believes no one should be denied their equality because of the accidents of birth and circumstances.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

You're exactly right: Romney's speech is not the "Separation by Richard Mynick on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 1:09:58 PM