Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (6 comments)

Someone to Watch Over Me

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has filed another law suit to keep the U.S. Army from having too much contact with the Boy Scouts of America.

Thank goodness we have the ACLU to protect
our Army from the Boy Scouts.

Scouts have held their National Jamboree at Fort A.P. Hill, Virginia since 1918, Over the years they have invested nearly $12 million in permanent infrastructure at the fort. Not too bad a deal for the Army, especially considering the Jamboree only lasts nine days once every four years.

The ACLU claims this sort of Army support for the Boy Scouts violates our First Amendment because the Scout Oath mentions God. Apparently the ACLU has no problem with our Army supporting religious factions in the Middle East.

Don't get me wrong. The ACLU is an important organization. It's like Greenpeace, only without the boat. Instead of sailing around protecting whales, the ACLU protects liberty. And it must be doing a great job, if the Boy Scouts are the biggest remaining threat.

To get a handle on the legal issues, I called my old friend Caufbaugh Twilley. Twilley isn't actually a lawyer but he listens to talk radio which is basically the same thing.


According to Twilley, the ACLU bases its suit on the first ten words of the First Amendment, which are: "Please close cover before striking."

No wait, that's the Ninth Amendment. The first ten words of the First Amendment are: "Congress shall pass no law respecting an establishment of religion . . ."

There are 35 other words in the First Amendment, but Twilley said to ignore those.

At first glance, letting Boy Scouts camp at an Army fort doesn't look very much like Congress passing a law respecting religion.

"Ignore that too," Twilley said.

The ACLU has used this same argument to prevent Boy Scouts from renting part of Balboa Park in San Diego.

"So, according to the ACLU, protecting religious freedom requires the government to keep people who believe in God from using public property?" I asked.

"That's not the way the ACLU says it," Twilley told me, "but the effect is the same."

Now for some people, this sort of religious discrimination against the Boy Scouts will sound a lot like religious discrimination against the Boy Scouts, but Twilley said to "Ignore that too."

It turns out those other 35 words protect free speech, free association, free assembly and free exercise of religion. The ACLU knows all about those words and has even used them to protect the right of Nazis to hold a public rally in Skokie, Illinois. Skokie was home to a large number of Holocaust survivors, so the City wanted the Nazis to provide insurance for their rally. Apparently requiring insurance is discrimination under those other 35 words.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Support the Boy Scouts

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

http://www.lexingtonfilm.com

Whether it's mishaps with a French-for-Travelers CD, or a media technology that corrects errors before they occur, Horace J. Digby never even sees the mark.

Winner of the Robert Benchley Society Award for Humor; selected to judge the (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Im certain some think you hysterical by ardee D. on Wednesday, Apr 12, 2006 at 7:22:25 AM
Just Two Questions . . . by Horace J. Digby on Thursday, Apr 13, 2006 at 1:03:03 PM
No Subject Entered by Horace J. Digby on Friday, May 26, 2006 at 3:04:42 AM
Sorry for the delay, I missed your response by ardee D. on Tuesday, Sep 19, 2006 at 8:24:08 PM
What About The Uniforms? by Horace J. Digby on Wednesday, Sep 20, 2006 at 4:33:11 AM
I could go and ask the ACLU by ardee D. on Wednesday, Sep 20, 2006 at 5:34:50 PM