Tag(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats

The Failure of the Surge

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

September is upon us and the much awaited (and anticipated) report from General Petraus on the situation in Iraq is becoming due.  Already there is a certain tug-of-war between the President and Congress over whether progress is really being made in Iraq (witness the study carried out by the White House in June), or whether little (if any) progress is being made (see the just-released GAO report).

In a perverse form of poetic justice, I see that any success of the so-called surge is really just further condemnation of the entire administration approach to the execution of the Iraqi invasion and its aftermath.  A story my father once told me will serve to illustrate that assertion: 

It was during the days when the tall ships ruled the oceans of the world, in the 18th and 19th centuries.  One such tall ship was sailing into the night when a fierce storm arose.  In the middle of this terrible tempest one of the cannons broke loose from its moorings and rolled about the deck, threatening to sink the ship.  One sailor braved the winds and rain and waves and went up on deck, grabbed the cannon, pushed it back into its berth, and lashed it securely into place.  His heroic actions saved the ship and the lives of his fellow sailors.

The next day the captain brought the entire crew up to the deck where he gave the sailor a medal for his heroism, then had the sailor hanged from the yardarm.

Why hang the heroic sailor, the sailor who saved everyone’s life?

Because it was that sailor's responsibility to make sure the cannon was properly secured before the storm arose.

The Bush administration is just like that sailor:  They were responsible, before the invasion of Iraq, to ensure that our military had enough men to accomplish the mission.  If 20,000-30,000 additional soldiers are making such a difference today, why weren’t they sent over to Iraq four-and-a-half years ago?  Or three years ago?  Or even last year?

If the surge is doing such wonderful things today, then wouldn’t such a surge at the beginning of the invasion have saved the lives of untold numbers of American soldiers and sailors?

Like that sailor of long ago, heroic actions today (the surge) do not compensate for yesterday’s lack of action when it comes to the Bush administration’s handling of the entire Iraqi war.  And any success of the surge only goes to further highlight that truth.

 

www.FreeWorldRadioNetwork.net

Hans Meyer is the host of Situation Awareness, a more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments