The self-interest served by Mr. Freeman's journey was his stance on the $20 billion US arms sale to Saudi Arabia.  He used his hateful journey to pave the way for his speaking out against the arms deal.  Had he started out writing about the arms deal, Mr. Freeman may not have gotten his readers to buy into his point of view.    I would like to explain how Mr. Freeman exaggerated some of the issues about Saudi Arabia.

It is almost impossible to commit theft so extreme that it is punished by the amputation of a hand.  There has to be three witnesses and it has to be proven that the thief did not desperately need that which he stole.  In all of my 50 years, I've known of only 2 or 3 cases.  Honor killing is not recognized by Saudi courts and no one is allowed to take the law into his own hands.  Anyone who follows the media in the Middle East will tell you that honor killing is mainly heard of in Jordan, Afghanistan and Pakistan, and even in those countries, it is against the law. 

Now we come to the abused and meaningless statement repeated by everyone who wants to link Saudi Arabia to terrorism.  15 out of 19 of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudis.  Al Qaeda employs men of all nationalities, including Americans.  Which nationality they turn to to carry out specific terrorist activities depends on the desired outcome.  In the case of 9/11, the desired Al Qaeda goal was to cut all links between Islam and the West.  They chose Saudis, who were brainwashed in Afghanistan by the Taliban, to represent Islam and chose the US to represent the West.

However, in the case of Saudi Arabia, the country is blamed for the crimes of a few.