Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
No comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Blue-Collar Workers=The Taliban: John McCain's "Elitism"

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

What if an adviser to one of the presidential candidates -- one who writes regularly for a major American newspaper and frequently appears on television -- had not just described residents of small-town America as "bitter," but had actually equated laid-off blue-collar workers with the Taliban?

What if this statement had not been just an off-the-cuff remark at a campaign event, but had actually been published in an official US government publication?

Specifically, what if he had said this:

"The American who graduated from high school in the 1960s expected a good job that would allow his family security and reasonably increasing prosperity. For many such Americans, the world has collapsed. . . . These discarded citizens (his emphasis) sense that their government is no longer about them, but only about the privileged. Some seek the solace of explicit religion."

And:

"These noncompetitive cultures, such as that of Arabo-Persian Islam or the rejectionist segment of our own population, are enraged. . . . The laid-off blue-collar worker in America and the Taliban militiaman in Afghanistan are brothers in suffering."

Yes, you read that right. Laid-off American blue-collar workers are no different than the Taliban -- just two noncompetitive losers in the great game of globalization. And "bitter"? No, they're "enraged."

And it happened.

While doing research for another article this weekend, I ran across these and other rather astonishing quotes from Ralph Peters, a retired Army Lt. Col. and, according to thinkprogress.org, an informal national security adviser to the John McCain campaign. It kind of puts the hullabaloo surrounding Barack Obama's "small town bitterness" remark in a whole 'nother light. It makes that clumsy but rather minor gaffe look like child's play. You want "elitist," as McCain described those remarks, or "condescending," as described by a Hillary Clinton supporter? How about "callous," "contemptuous," or "cruel"? And unlike Samantha Power, the Obama foreign policy adviser who resigned after calling Clinton a "monster" in front of a reporter, this was not a spontaneous aside that Peters hoped would be kept off-the-record. This was written and issued in an official US Army publication.

The article was entitled "Constant Conflict," and it was published in the Summer 1997 issue of Parameters, the US Army War College Quarterly. Peters was then an Army Major working for the Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence.

Peters, now a spy novelist and columnist for Rupert Murdoch's New York Post, held nothing back in putting his spooky, Nietzchean ubermenschen worldview on display. Almost every paragraph contained an equally breathtaking remark. Here are a few more choice ones:

"We are entering a new American century, in which we will become still wealthier, culturally more lethal, and increasingly powerful. We will excite hatreds without precedent."

"There will be more democracy -- that deft liberal form of imperialism -- and greater popular refusal of democracy."

"It is fashionable among world intellectual elites to decry "American culture," with our domestic critics among the loudest in complaint. But traditional intellectual elites are of shrinking relevance, replaced by cognitive-practical elites -- figures such as Bill Gates, Steven Spielberg, Madonna, or our most successful politicians -- human beings who can recognize or create popular appetites, recreating themselves as necessary. . . . The genius, the secret weapon, of American culture is the essence that the elites despise: ours is the first genuine people's culture. It stresses comfort and convenience -- ease -- and it generates pleasure for the masses. We are Karl Marx's dream, and his nightmare."

"There will be no peace. At any given moment for the rest of our lifetimes, there will be multiple conflicts in mutating forms around the globe. . . . The de facto role of the US armed forces will be to keep the world safe for our economy and open to our cultural assault. To those ends, we will do a fair amount of killing."

Dr. Strangelove, I presume.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Gregg Gordon is a writer, musician, activist, and otherwise ne'er-do-well in Columbus, Ohio. "Nobody made a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could do only a little." - Edmund Burke
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why I Didn't Buy A Dell, Dude: An Open Letter to the Eighth Richest Man in America

How a Surge "Works"

So the War Isn't Gonna Be an Issue, eh?

Is Obama a Self-Hating White? What Booker T & the MGs Have To Do With It

Those Crazy Kagans, America's War-Lovingest Family

Should the Government Just Sell Naming Rights?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments