Tag(s): , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats

SAIC Contract Indicates Wolfowitz's Companion Riza Paid

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Get Embed HTML Code
By Government Accountability Project  Posted by Amanda Lang (about the submitter)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (7 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

(Washington, D.C.) – Yesterday, GAP released the contract showing that Shaha Riza, companion of Paul Wolfowitz, performed consulting work for defense contractor SAIC in Iraq between March and May of 2003. Total funds paid to SAIC for services, according to the contract, equal $235,231.28. Riza’s attorney has informed the press that she was not paid by SAIC. The details of the contract and Riza’s public statements are at odds and raise serious questions that need clarification.


Under the contract’s Statement of Work, three Subject Matter Experts are named, with Riza appearing first. In the budget they are listed as line items: Executive Management Consultant I, II and III. Labor costs are shown as T&M (Time and Materials) in the detailed contract, while other expenses such as travel are shown as ODC (Other Direct Costs). The contract shows that all three consultants were paid labor costs.


The report shows that labor costs for all three positions were funded. It is important to note that the contract clearly distinguishes between payments made for expenses and fees paid for labor. Labor costs for Consultant I equal $17,100.56; II was paid $97,144.32; and III earned $65,798.40. These appear as consultant fees, net of expenses (ODC).


Paragraphs 6.3 and 6.4 explicitly state that the US Government (USG) will pay all travel expenses, supplies and equipment. Because Riza took four weeks of annual leave to work for SAIC, it is probable that she was Consultant I, paid about $17,000 for approximately 30 days work.


If, as her attorney stated, Riza wasn’t paid by SAIC, then disbursements were not made in compliance with the contract. If SAIC billed the Defense Department for her labor under the contract, but didn't pay her, SAIC should explain this discrepancy. The public needs the facts to understand what happened here.


Government Accountability Project


The Government Accountability Project is the nation’s leading whistleblower protection organization. Through litigating whistleblower cases, publicizing concerns and developing legal reforms, GAP’s mission is to protect the public interest by promoting government and corporate accountability. Founded in 1977, GAP is a non-profit, non-partisan advocacy organization with offices in Washington, D.C. and Seattle, WA.

#####

Dylan Blaylock
Communications Director, Government Accountability Project
202.408.0034 ext. 137; 202.236.3733 (cell)

1612 K. St, #1100 Washington, D.C. 20006

 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Editor

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments