OpEdNews Op Eds

Greenpeace Report Exposes Empty Promises in Congo

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (37 fans)


CARPE PARTNERS (Source: Weidemann Report, USAID, CARPE)

I was deep into an all-but-inaccessible “protected community preserve” in DRC when someone handed me a filthy plastic bag and wanted me to look inside. The contents? A greasy, half-decomposed gorilla hand and a dried out piece of Okapi skin. I held the gorilla hand in my own; the desire to be close to the once magnificent creature was enough to overcome the stench and the kick-gut revulsion. This preserve, like the villages raped of their forest resources as noted yesterday’s Greenpeace Report (http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/international/press/reports/carving-up-the-congo-exec.pdf), had nothing but a bag of empty promises and rotting flesh as payment for the handover of ancestral lands to conservation organizations. Greenpeace, to their credit, has gone after the World Bank and International logging companies. NOT ONE DOLLAR of the World Bank imposed taxes on logging companies has gone to local authorities, according to the report. However, conservation organizations have mysteriously remained immune from criticism.

There is one exception, but this report has gone pretty much unnoticed. In February, 2006, Weidemann Associates published a report, commissioned by USAID, which was intended to evaluate the CARPE (Central African Regional Program for the Environment). The team spent a grand total of three weeks in central Africa, and it took me four days to reach one village that has yet to be evaluated by an on-ground assessment by USAID. Weidemann’s time was managed, and the report says as much. Still, some serious criticism was leveled at the management of the CARPE program, which over seven years has earmarked $73M and counting from USAID alone.

The Weidemann Report criticized the linkage of funding to specific geographic areas, or “landscapes,” without accountability to the village governances which signed over the land in the first place. Like the hapless villagers in the Greenpeace reports who traded salt for land, villagers in the CARPE program traded land for universities and health clinics which materialized in the form of half-constructed buildings and medical exam tables which represent “community clinics.”

The Weidemann Report quotes unnamed “observers” who termed the landscape grants “pork for the conservation movement, with minimal CARPE ownership by national governments.”

USAID is criticized for providing insufficient management structure for the scope of the undertaking, a program design that does not provide monitoring across “a confusing array of US Government and NGO organizations “whose efforts were very unevenly implemented in scope, scale, and geographic focus.” Take a look at the graphic posted here. John Le Carre’s fictional “Three Bees” corporation notwithstanding (The Constant Gardener), there is something sinister about Pfizer Pharmaceuticals phallic arrow jabbing at the DFGFI logo.

A Freedom of Information request on this issue was submitted to USAID in January , but experience has shown that a response could take years. We need a Congressional Investigation. If Americans don’t care about the villagers, perhaps they care about their tax dollars which are being laundered in the heart of darkness. If the road to hell is paved with good intentions, then the acrimonious trinity composed of USAID, CARPE and business interests in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is the three-headed dog that guards the maws of Hades.

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Hold Hearings on USAID Funding in Africa

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Georgianne Nienaber is an investigative environmental and political writer. She lives in rural northern Minnesota, New Orleans and South Florida. Her articles have appeared in The Society of Professional Journalists' Online Quill (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Dian Fossey and the Gorilla Killings

Should the World Boycott the Beijing Olympics? The Horrific Story of the Falun Gong

Haiti Watch: Disease Threatens Infants and No Plans to Stop It

"Sticks in Vaginas:" This Is What a Massacre Looks Like

Fox-Owned National Geographic Uses Gorillas as Cover for Exploitation of Congo

Baghdad on the Bayou Redux: Tab Benoit Interview

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments