Have you ever heard of this conspiracy before? It was certainly a very large one. And if the conspirators controlled the newspapers then, how much worse is it today with media consolidation?
Google "Mighty Wurlitzer" and "Operation Mockingbird" for further information.
http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/
George WashingtonGeorge Washington is a pen name. I am using the pen name, with the approval of the publisher, because I have received death threats due to my 9/11 research and writing. I am using a pen name to protect myself and my family.
Mr. Washington, your recent shock regarding the media's utter contempt and disregard for the purpose it was ostensibly created represents the tip of a very large iceberg of corruption, deceit and control, the depths of which require years of independant research to fully understand. Most people, if suddenly confronted with all that has been kept from them over the course of their entire lives, couldn't handle it.
Orwell was correct when he said, "Omission is the greatest lie of all."
by
Bill Cain (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 271 comments)
on Friday, January 11, 2008 at 10:22:33 AM
The media plants propaganda to mislead people. For example, the New York Times published the WTC Task Force Interviews of the First Responders to the 9/11 attacks.
The transcripts contain numerous references to bombs, explosives, flashes, and controlled demolitions of the WTC.
However, some of the transcripts are highly redacted. What information did the New York Times redact? You guessed it... supporting evidence for Directed Energy Weapons! This was confirmed by a later interview with one of the First Responders!
So, the media is nothing more than a propaganda machine. Anyone promoting controlled demolitions instead of directed energy weapons is playing right into the 9/11 perpetrators' hands.
“In Jones' case, he was attacked by a few but very vocal people, who "claimed" to be for 9/11 truth, yet who bizarrely attacked Jones because he had found evidence of a controlled demolition of the WTC Towers. These "so called truth activists" attacked Jones because they said he was covering up something. These "activists" claimed that the WTCs were never hit by planes on 9/11, and all we saw were only "holograms" and that what actually brought down the towers were "space weapons."
FOR THE RECORD, the mainstream 9/11 truth movement knows this is insane, and that it is meant to distract and dissuade the mass public from looking at the real evidence of the events of 9/11."
Are you a disnifo agent, CB?
by
Roark Howard (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 351 comments)
on Friday, January 11, 2008 at 11:14:17 AM
No I am not. Are you? My posts contain factual information that anyone who takes the time to look through it can see.
First of all, government plants like Steven Jones have brainwashed the "truth movement" into thinking directed energy weapons and Tv-Fakery are "crazy disinfo". He did that for a purpose: to hide the real truth.
Second, there are people who have the brains to apply basic physics to an event, such as Newton's Laws of Motion to the cartoon airplanes. The videos are fake.
Third, your claim that people will "laugh at you" is silly and unfounded. The TRUTH is that most people see the TRUTH of 9/11 from the directed energy weapon / TV-Fakery evidence, especially when coupled with attorney Jerry Leaphart's two court cases in the US District Court, Southern New York.
Even Peter Jennings knew the 9/11 airplane video was fake. Note his nervousness and word fumbling when ABC plays the clip back in slow motion. Click here for video.Show it to people and gauge their reaction.
If people laugh at the idea of holograms/projections, show them the analysis of the WTC Task Force Interviews that were published in the New York Times. Prove to them that a very small percentage of the First Responders who reported seeing airplanes also reported hearing them. In other words, most of the First Responders did NOT report hearing commercial aircraft. However, they had no trouble hearing the fighter jets later on!Click here for analysis. Show it to people and gauge their reaction.
The perpetrators are controlling the "truth movement"! Can't you see that?
Lenin, the first Communist dictator after the takeover of Russia in 1917, is widely credited with the following quotation, "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."
by
CB Brooklyn (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 403 comments)
on Friday, January 11, 2008 at 10:54:22 PM
With the disclaimer of still being a schoolgirl with limited media sources, I still have vivid recollection of the many slurs on Roosevelt. Especially with the criticism of the National Recovery Act which required business to make certain concessions in the interest of pump priming. The sense of the times was that people would turn on Washington, DC. Whatever the US Chamber of Commerce could do then to blunt change would not surprise me. Change comes grudgingly to those with financial interests. Much like nowadays when we rant against corporations.
I suggest a breakdown in the definition of conspiracy. Whoever conspires for change will be challenged by counter-conspirators. The press, then and now, starts with the status quo and eventually allows a glimpse of contradiction. Newspersons can't see much further than the rest of standpatters.
by
Margaret Bassett (21 articles, 1364 quicklinks, 28 diaries, 824 comments)
on Saturday, January 12, 2008 at 3:49:31 PM
