Tags for This Article:

Congress (2830)  Government (2694)  Whistleblowers-ing (289)  Hearings (225)  Government Corruption (187)  Government Services (34) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
April 5, 2008 at 07:01:11

Headlined on 4/5/08:
Government Whistle Blowers risk all

by Gallaher     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

(0.0 from 0 ratings) View Ratings | Rate It

The Congress held hearings this week calling FAA whistle Blowers to testify. It is likely these guys life as a federal civil servant is over. They have dedicated their lives to protecting you. Now they have done the ultimate sacrifice. They have in a sense laid down there life on a grenade to protect the public they served. There will be no medal awarded here, and no recognition by anyone else for their heroic duty.

My hat is off to them.

Jon Hilkevitch - CHICAGO TRIBUNE reported

“One whistle-blower, FAA inspector Douglas Peters, choked up with emotion while describing his conversation with an FAA manager last June about Peters’ concerns over “unethical actions” by FAA personnel in the failure to inspect 47 Southwest Airlines planes. The manager agreed to look into issues that Peters raised in a memo. But walking over to a bookshelf in Peters’ office where he keeps family photos, the manager picked up a picture of Peters’ son standing near a plane and said, “This is what’s important, family and flying.” On his way out the door, the manager added: “You have a good job here, and your wife has a good job [at an FAA facility in Dallas]. I’d hate to see you jeopardize yours and her careers trying to take down a couple of losers.” “

What the FAA manager said was not untrue. I too was a whistle blower and it is why I do not work for the FAA anymore. I still think about my time there as a pilot and systems engineer was well spent as a public servant. But the results of Blowing the Whistle were devastating to mylife,  career and ultimately sent me to federal prison.

I recognize now that the U.S. government’s executive branch is broken beyond repair, because of the structure of temporary political appointees, typically figureheads that don’t know anything about the agency they are put in charge of, over life long civil servants that have made the specific agency their life long commitment. Sadly, it makes no difference if it is a Republican or Democrat, so not even an election can cure the problem.

It is not wise as a government employee to bring up a problems or “Blow the Whistle” under this type of structured government. No politician over an agency wants to look like he/she is incompetent at his/her job. It looks bad all the way up to the president. Just look at Browne with FEMA and the effect it had on Bush.

If a problem is bad enough for a public Whistle Blowing, it is going to make the political appointee over that agency look bad. His/her agency is out of his control. This will in turn make the president look bad for selecting someone incompetent and unable to control the conduct of the agency. Presidents and their personal wrecking crews do have control many other executive agencies’ including the IRS, the U.S. Attorney, etc… that can and will do everything in their power to make the whistle blowers life a complete living hell if they have disgraced the executive branch.

When a Whistle Blower case does go to the federal courts for resolution the Congress steps aside and will no longer assist the whistle blower. The Congress will cite, as they did to me in my case, the separations of power, leaving the Whistle Blower at the mercy of the federal courts stacked with more presidential appointees to judge the case. Talk about a stacked deck.

Government agencies are represented by the United States Attorney’s office in federal court. The first tactic is to discredit the Whistle Blower as a disgruntled employee. Attempts are then made to minimize the problem reported.

In my case one of the problems I reported was a safety system that was required to be monitored, I reported it as not being monitored. The FAA said 15% of the system was being monitored and I was therefore not correct in reporting the system was not being monitored because 15% was being monitored.  Yes, your government does make bizarre claims like this.

Attacks are then directed as to job performance, questions as to mental stability, or anything else in their play book. In my case I had just been recommended for a national “against all odds” award for my work performance, so that tactic did not work.

If these tactics don’t work, as in my case where the Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia openly stated this to me, they will starve the Whistle Blower out by extending the case for so long the legal bills will drive them under. In my case, I did go bankrupt and was forced to move in with my parents. But I still fought on.

If that doesn’t work they begin to search out anything that can be used against you including an audit with the IRS. If that doesn’t work threaten some type of criminal charge. I’ve seen it all.

Settle your case or else. I have an Assistant United States Attorney on tape telling me to settle my case or they were going to indict me for failure to pay child support amount based on my former position with the FAA. When I still refused to settle and my family paid the past due support I was indicted for failure to pay child support anyway and sent to federal prison for 16 months.

Unable to continue my Whistle Blower case, it was dropped by the court. I did not get anything for my wrongful dismissal.

 1  |  2

 

10 year Navy veteran,

former Federal employee with various agencies,

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
24 comments

I am a chemist and able to contribute to the debate about thermite.
gravity32I am a chemist and able to contribute to the debate about thermite.

no wonder

People say the official 9/11 story must be true because there are few whistleblowers and none who can prove explosives were laid.

But if they can do all this to a person who was involved only in poor maintenance of aircraft, what would they do to someone who blew the whistle on explosives in all three towers?

See the evidence here

 

by gravity32 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 150 comments) on Saturday, April 5, 2008 at 10:18:26 AM
 


10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,
Gallaher10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,

Who knows?

Who knows?

I don’t agree with the theory that the buildings were bombed. I do know that you cannot trust anything the government tells you unless you know from some other source that it is true.

I was directed to with hold evidence from the NTSB for a crash by management in Washington. I was told it was not my job to report to the NTSB the information of inoperable systems involved in a crash that killed several people.

It was an FAA maintained system. No metion was made of the system in the final NTSB crash report.

by Gallaher (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 529 comments) on Sunday, April 6, 2008 at 7:08:35 PM
 


Aging bleeding heart liberal who continues to believe in justice and the goodness of some people. I always have hope in a better fairer tomorrow. I do not understand the greed motivation,but I know it is seductive and pervasive.
cluelessflAging bleeding heart liberal who continues to believe in justice and the goodness of some people. I always have hope in a better fairer tomorrow. I do not understand the greed motivation,but I know it is seductive and pervasive.

Some Give All

Gallaher Someone must thank you for the sacrifices you have made in an attempt to protect the public, even if the public is somewhat complicit, by their silence in these  matters. Whistle blowers almost always try to work within the system to correct wrongs, but then they are given no choice, but to go outside the system. And they always pay a price. I am a retired nurse who fought the system and the system won.  I paid with my health and sanity at one point. But it was my decision. But I do have peace of mind, in that I did the best I could .It will not feed you but it does take the edge off every now and then.

by cluelessfl (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 184 comments) on Saturday, April 5, 2008 at 10:33:29 AM
 


10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,
Gallaher10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,

Thank You

My wife comforts me and reassures me that I did the right thing.

by Gallaher (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 529 comments) on Sunday, April 6, 2008 at 7:11:12 PM
 


56 years on this jumpin' green sphere. Musician. Own and operate a music store to help kids find a possible life long friend. I believe in the soul and the search. Happily married w/ 2 boys. Published songwriter. play bass, piano and gut string guitar. there are no solutions..only alternatives. Ask questions. Listen. Be fair and don't expect. Baseball is a mirror. Don't ask....unless you have time and a sense of humor. Peace is never easy, but worth it. Always.
mikel paul56 years on this jumpin' green sphere. Musician. Own and operate a music store to help kids find a possible life long friend. I believe in the soul and the search. Happily married w/ 2 boys. Published songwriter. play bass, piano and gut string guitar. there are no solutions..only alternatives. Ask questions. Listen. Be fair and don't expect. Baseball is a mirror. Don't ask....unless you have time and a sense of humor. Peace is never easy, but worth it. Always.

Your honor is recorded sir

     I have compassion for you, sadness for those who inextricably judge you not on the merits of your duty, but on their loyalties to those who appointed them. The system is (seems) irrefuttably set up to protect the order, not the people.

     That being said, I would hope there are those who will not quench their cause because of the stacked deck. Like a spoon on concrete, eventually an opening will appear. It takes many to lay the road for the the one that breaks through. 

     The managers comment of Peter's 'family' reminds me of Aaron Russo's story of when Nick Rockefeller offered to 'letter' him into the CFR. Aaron's years of friendship with Nick and Nick's explanation in the year 2000 of the planned RFID's, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq brought on by an 'incident' caused him to refuse Nick's suggestion he join. Nick didn't understand why Aaron wasn't interested in joining the CFR. Aaron asked Nick "what about 'the people'? (affected by these planned events). Nick's response: "Why do you care about those people. They're just people. You have a family Aaron. Take care of your family".

     The disconnect is chilling.

     Your honor is recorded. Thank you. Your children proud of their father.

     peace

by mikel paul (8 articles, 1 quicklinks, 7 diaries, 341 comments) on Saturday, April 5, 2008 at 10:42:33 AM
 


10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,
Gallaher10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,

My children know

They live with me for a little more than a quarter of the year. They did complain that I would spend too much time on my cases. They wanted to spend the summer at Six Flags, White Water, or the pool.

I'm remarried now.

My wife went through the entire ordeal (before we were married). We got married a year after I got out of prison. Both, she and her parents went to court with me and were shocked at how corrupt the process was. They knew I was inocent of what I was charged with.

Innocents, right or wrong, does not matter in American courts. It is all about who can win.   

My wife came to see me every weekend once I was in the prison camp.

If you don’t think your government tortures people here in America you are mistaken. I’ve seen it first hand.

I’ve seen people forced to stand for hours naked in a cage shivering on the roof of a building 13 stories up in late December.

I’ve met people imprisoned for doing exactly what the government told them to do.

I could write several books on the atrocities Americans do to their own people.

 

by Gallaher (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 529 comments) on Sunday, April 6, 2008 at 6:26:33 PM
 


The articles reflect additional thoughts that expand on the author's ten volumes Genesis Begins the Millennia. The work begins in 1995 with a fictional account of ordinary Israelis absorbed with everyday events. There are extraordinary happenings the characters gradually recognize as portents of the Messianic Age. Volumes four and five show why the Messiah decided to delay His arrival.
Volumes six through ten [Tradebombers] begin six weeks before the 9/11 World Trade Center tragedy. Again,...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Jason PazThe articles reflect additional thoughts that expand on the author's ten volumes Genesis Begins the Millennia. The work begins in 1995 with a fictional account of ordinary Israelis absorbed with everyday events. There are extraordinary happenings the characters gradually recognize as portents of the Messianic Age. Volumes four and five show why the Messiah decided to delay His arrival.
Volumes six through ten [Tradebombers] begin six weeks before the 9/11 World Trade Center tragedy. Again,...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Corruption and Injustice Usually Triumph

Your experiences sound familiar to me although mine occurred in Israel. I was in court 35 times [three in the Supreme Court] and never got to a discussion of content. For charging over 100 Israeli officials with crimes against humanity and murder one, I have had a hold order on me for 16 years.

You and I have no national recourse our countries being almost totally corrupt. As I am old and broken, I won't live to see a solution.

I am content to join my fellow victims in a class action suit in Europe.

Nail the perpetrators, I say. 

by Jason Paz (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 72 comments) on Saturday, April 5, 2008 at 12:18:35 PM
 


10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,
Gallaher10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,

I'm on hold too

For years after I left to FAA every flight I made I had a U.S. Marshal next to me. I thought it was quite comical. I don’t fly anymore and I’m not permitted to leave the United States even though my sentence and probation has long since been over.

by Gallaher (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 529 comments) on Sunday, April 6, 2008 at 7:27:05 PM
 


SW Texas ultra-liberal
john riggsSW Texas ultra-liberal

If I was the head of the FAA

I would give the whistleblower his bosses job, and can the threat makers. If Cybil Edmonds cant be heard we are in bad bad shape. In the military and defence civil service we had a reward system if funds were recuperated and employees got protection from retaliation. I dont think any of this matters though, folks dont want to fly anymore to avoid the thugs at the airports and ticket prices are climbing and airlines shutting down.  The elite is sacrificing some of their own in the fascist takeover.

by john riggs (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 369 comments) on Saturday, April 5, 2008 at 1:11:18 PM
 


10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,
Gallaher10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,

All civil service is the same

You said,

"In the military and defence civil service we had a reward system if funds were recuperated and employees got protection from retaliation. "

The same thing is available for civil servants in the FAA. Saddly, it doesn't work.

It is only OK if you make them look good. You are not a real whistle blower in this case you are merely informing them of a problem they agree with. I was in the military for 10 years and saw the same thing there.

 

by Gallaher (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 529 comments) on Sunday, April 6, 2008 at 7:34:14 PM
 


Mother of 7, grandmother of 21, great grandmother of 41 and great-great grandmother of 2 and loving every minute of it. I want a better world for us all than the mess we have now.
RaeMother of 7, grandmother of 21, great grandmother of 41 and great-great grandmother of 2 and loving every minute of it. I want a better world for us all than the mess we have now.

Whistle blowers

I am so sorry that being a caring person of conscience and courage that you have been subjected to a living nightmare. In my book you are a hero. You are the kind of person we need more of.

Unfortunately the Cabal of the greed and power driven who have a stanglehold on our country are without conscience, ethics, morality and decency.  They hold those that do possess those qualities in contempt.

Our country is a mess. We have no voice and no representation except for a very, very few among our elected and those voices are not being heard. I can't help but feel that those who don't adhere to the depravity of the many, are probably receiving threats to keep them from taking the steps that it would take to bring about any measurable change.

Keep in mind during your darkest time that your choice of doing what was right regardless of the consequences are what keeps hope alive within the rest of us. Perhaps the example you, and others like you,  show to others will be the catalast that eventually unites us to have the courage to do what ever is necessary to bring the changes so desperately needed.

by Rae (0 articles, 1 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 219 comments) on Saturday, April 5, 2008 at 8:50:26 PM
 


Gavin R. Putland is the Research Officer for Prosper Australia.
Gavin R. PutlandGavin R. Putland is the Research Officer for Prosper Australia.

The jury: your last line of defence

If the judge can stop the jury from hearing evidence or argument favorable to the accused, then, from the jury's viewpoint, the presumption of innocence includes the presumption that evidence or argument favorable to the accused is being suppressed. Therefore the jurors must acquit every time -- regardless of what evidence or argument they *are* allowed to hear.

Pass it on.

by Gavin R. Putland (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 3 comments) on Saturday, April 5, 2008 at 9:14:32 PM
 


10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,
Gallaher10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,

Only if they know.

I spoke with a woman on a 18 month tour with the United States Grand Jury.

She had no idea that it was perfectly legal for the United States Attorney to openly make false statements it is frequently done just to win a case and nothing can be done about it because it is not testimony.

Even if it is proven that they provided false information nothing can be done to them.

Most jurors believe whatever is told to them by the government. Why would they lie?

by Gallaher (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 529 comments) on Sunday, April 6, 2008 at 6:05:57 PM
 


Gavin R. Putland is the Research Officer for Prosper Australia.
Gavin R. PutlandGavin R. Putland is the Research Officer for Prosper Australia.

FRAUD UPON THE COURT

Google "fraud upon the court" and "fraud on the court".  See especially http://www.ballew.com/bob/htm/fotc.htm .

by Gavin R. Putland (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 3 comments) on Monday, April 7, 2008 at 3:28:05 AM
 


10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,
Gallaher10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,

Judge says no fraud

Judge said that a curative statement during final jury instructions, “nothing the attorneys said was evidence”, was good enough. This ruling was after an objection as to the known false statements and outside the hearing of the jury.

If a U.S. Attorney tells a jury that you are a mass murderer. Do you think that an obscure curative statement at the end is going to cure the undue prejudice?

Not when juries don't understand that the government does knowingly make false statements at trial just to win the case.

 

by Gallaher (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 529 comments) on Monday, April 7, 2008 at 5:56:57 PM
 


Just a guy who has been reading the various articles and feel I might have something to add. Overall an interesting site that allows a lot of discussion on great topics.
stanley smithJust a guy who has been reading the various articles and feel I might have something to add. Overall an interesting site that allows a lot of discussion on great topics.

I have to ask the question?????

I too watched the hearings and was quite frankly shocked by what I heard.  These guys stood up and protected the public while taking on great personal risk.  We owe them a serious thank you!

Reading your article though, something isn't make sense.  To get to the position of being tried in federal court for not paying child support (regardless of their motivation for why they were going after you) you have to be seriously delinquent in your payments and making no effort at living up to that obligation.  Another way of saying that is that you opened the door for your own prosecution by not living up to your obligation as a parent.  This is the lowest of the low.  I know you are going to say the government this or that but at the end of the day nothing is lower than a man or woman who does not live up to their obligations to their children.

Comparing yourself to the individuals who testified this past week is probably a stretch!

by stanley smith (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 3 comments) on Sunday, April 6, 2008 at 2:39:44 AM
 


Gavin R. Putland is the Research Officer for Prosper Australia.
Gavin R. PutlandGavin R. Putland is the Research Officer for Prosper Australia.

What the...

Read the article.  The child support was paid.  The only reason why it was ever in danger of not being paid was the unjust dismissal.

by Gavin R. Putland (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 3 comments) on Sunday, April 6, 2008 at 3:57:57 AM
 


Just a guy who has been reading the various articles and feel I might have something to add. Overall an interesting site that allows a lot of discussion on great topics.
stanley smithJust a guy who has been reading the various articles and feel I might have something to add. Overall an interesting site that allows a lot of discussion on great topics.

Re; What the ....

I'm not buying it.  Way too many people involved in the process as well as mandatory appeals, public court rooms, etc.  A conspiracy on this level could NOT and does NOT exist.  Especially since a basic search on the internet reveals a lot. 

Since you question it, check out this guys other posts and his other article.  Sense a slant.  I do.  This article just pieces a lot of it together.   

by stanley smith (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 3 comments) on Sunday, April 6, 2008 at 10:13:59 AM
 


10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,
Gallaher10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,

I do have several cases published

Gallaher v. Secretary of Transportation, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia filed in Dec 1998. U.S. v. Gallaher began Dec 2000 during settlement negotiations.

It does not take much at a trial court level to prevent an appeal.

No you are not "guaranteed" an appeal. Cases are screwed up daily by court appointed attorneys. Mine admitted in open court he knew nothing about family law. He then proceeded to make stipulations with the U.S. Attorney in areas that he admitted he had no knowledge.I think the court of Appeals may not be as tainted as the proceedings in the trial courts unless they too are looking for a boost to the Supreme Court.

 

by Gallaher (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 529 comments) on Sunday, April 6, 2008 at 6:58:22 PM
 


10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,
Gallaher10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,

It only takes one year

This was a bizarre situation. My Ex-wife did not even testify. It was not her. The State of Florida admitted it was them and they were working with the FAA and the US Attorney.

It did not matter that it was paid or that it was overdue. The only thing that mattered is that I did not settle with the government. They admitted to this. I have this as testimony given in pre-trial hearings.

 

by Gallaher (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 529 comments) on Sunday, April 6, 2008 at 5:58:37 PM
 


10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,
Gallaher10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,

Ex-wife owed child support did not testify

The Florida child support official testified at a pretrial hearing that she was working with the FAA and the United States Attorney and the deal was that I would be indicted if I did not settle with the FAA. Not if I did not pay my child support. All it takes is $5000 and your children living in another state.

 My support was based on my FAA salary and it was not chump change. I had over 15 years as an as an EE, Airways Systems Specialist, and was chief pilot for the Caribbean.

by Gallaher (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 529 comments) on Sunday, April 6, 2008 at 6:36:01 PM
 


Dave Kisor was an Aviation Electrician, USN / USNR, starting in 1971, working on A-4F Skyhawks & A-7E Corsair 2s ashore and afloat on the USS Hancock & USS Coral Sea. AA Speech Communications, the BA and MA in Geography and presently working for the US Forest Service as a Physical Science Technician. It's not just an adventure, it's a job. He's politically & progressively Green, and owned by his magnificent cat, The Empress Panthera.
Dave KisorDave Kisor was an Aviation Electrician, USN / USNR, starting in 1971, working on A-4F Skyhawks & A-7E Corsair 2s ashore and afloat on the USS Hancock & USS Coral Sea. AA Speech Communications, the BA and MA in Geography and presently working for the US Forest Service as a Physical Science Technician. It's not just an adventure, it's a job. He's politically & progressively Green, and owned by his magnificent cat, The Empress Panthera.

The "no fear act" is a joke

The hell of it is, federal employees are supposed to take a mandatory course called the "No Fear Act," which is supposed to get you to believe that you can do this sort of thing and not fear retribution.  If you fail to take a mandatory course in the Department of Agriclutter and they'll start messing with your paycheck and believe me, there is damned little other reason to work for them, even in the Forest Circus.  It is unfortunate, but there are many federal employees who don't have much confidence in their employer.
http://www.dotcr.ost.dot.gov/asp/nofear.asp

by Dave Kisor (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 123 comments) on Sunday, April 6, 2008 at 2:17:57 PM
 


10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,
Gallaher10 year Navy veteran,former Federal employee with various agencies,

You better fear

This is more feel good legislation that means nothing. You had better fear for your job and your life as you know it.

Another employee agreed to testify in my case against the FAA. He was fired within a month. They claimed he altered a piss test. Oddly, you could not be fired for testing positive for drugs when working for the FAA. They sent you to drug treatment. But you could be fired for altering a drug test. They claimed he had too many nitrates in his piss. I knew this guy for many years on and off the job and he did not do drugs.

He was re-hired after my case was dropped.

by Gallaher (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 529 comments) on Monday, April 7, 2008 at 6:12:28 PM
 

 

24 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Loserville: Obama Is Channeling Kerry and Gore by Dave Lindorff

Are you ready for nuclear war? by Paul Craig Roberts

Fresh New Discovery - Can You Guess What This Photo Is? by Meryl Ann Butler

"Caroline: Pull a Cheney!" An Open Letter to Caroline Kennedy (head of the Obama VP search team) Posted by Stephen Fox

NSA MAY BE READING WINDOWS SOFTWARE IN YOUR COMPUTER by Sherwood Ross

The REAL John McCain by Mike Kuykendall

Mr. Bill: "OH NO, Fix the coast you broke, Shell Oil!" by Georgianne Nienaber

Russia to US: Checkmate! by William Helbig

New Zogby/Reuters Poll: Obama Down 5, in an Almost Perfect Storm by Rob Kall

Whatever Happened to the Anger On the Left? by Marc McDonald

Select Time