Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (7 comments)

Immigrant Human Katrina Flooding into the United States

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Get Embed HTML Code
By Frosty Wooldridge  Posted by Frosty Wooldridge (about the submitter)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (1 fan)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

Folks, we already house between 305 and 335 million residents in the USA – and our crumbling infrastructure (schools, hospitals, roads, prisons, etc) suffers maxed-out consequences as we slide into a major recession. To recover, we must place a moratorium on growth.

We stand ten months away from the next president opening our borders to a flood of humanity. Progressives Obama, Hillary and McCain promise to give amnesty to more than 30 million illegal aliens, continue chain migration, double U.S. immigration from 1.0 to 2.0 million annually and accept unending millions of anchor babies. This 'red carpet approach' means 70 million MORE immigrants and their children will flood into America by 2040— a 32 year heartbeat in time.

If that happens, if we allow an added 70 million people within three decades, the information in the interview with Dr. Albert Bartlett below will certainly raise the hair on the back of your neck. With our already ongoing population growth of 30 million, that means 100 million more people added to America!

On ABC News last week, Charles Gibson reported Lake Mead near Las Vegas, which provides water for millions of people in the West, will dry up by 2023. He said, "The cause comes from drought, global warming and population growth." In December, Gibson informed us that Lake Lanier, Georgia had already dried up in 2007! He didn't tell audiences that Georgia expects to add six million more people in four decades.

Did Gibson report on ways to solve the water storage decline? No!

We cannot change drought. At the same time, population growth devours water faster than it can be recharged. It's a Faustian dilemma. Yet, everyone thinks population growth remains inevitable. False! Nature stops populations from growing when they cannot obtain enough water or food. That's why Australia, the same size as the contiguous United States of America, only supports 20 million people! Desert dominates 95 percent of Australia.

In America, however, corporations, political leaders, realtors and home builders salivate at the word "growth." They drool all over the land and environment. They pour concrete onto 6,000 acres daily and 2.19 million acres annually.

Dr. Albert Bartlett, University of Colorado

The following interview with Dr. Albert Bartlett of the prestigious University of Colorado will give you plenty of reasons for taking action: As CU's brilliant Dr. Albert Bartlett said,

"It's time to try again to correct the educationally credentialed but innumerate experts (innumeracy is the mathematical equivalent of illiteracy) who say that growth is inevitable. They fail to recognize that after maturity, continued growth is either obesity or cancer."

Nonetheless, short-sighted leaders in America say, "So our choice is not whether we grow, but how we grow."

"The authors of growth would like us to believe that the battle against growth is lost," Bartlett said, "so our only role is to be the best possible losers. We should give up the efforts to achieve a quiet stability for our communities, and in defeat, we should embrace the principles of "Smart Growth." We must remember that "Smart Growth" and "Dumb Growth" both destroy the environment, but "Smart Growth" destroys the environment with good taste."

Leadership failure

Does anyone understand that our leaders yank our leash into unending, unacceptable and relentless growth? Does the reader understand such growth yields chronic and painful ramifications of obesity or cancerous results for everyone in America regarding quality of life and standard of living?

What does 'growth' really bring to you and me?

Yes, it creates a few 'rich' people. However, Bartlett said,

Next Page  1  |  2

 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Editor

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

A very slippery slope here by ardee D. on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2008 at 7:56:47 AM
Mass immigration no longer viable or sustainable by Frosty Wooldridge on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2008 at 8:56:49 AM
You forget yourself sir by ardee D. on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:44:43 AM
Unrelenting immigration unsustainable by Frosty Wooldridge on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:03:05 PM
Why if in disagreement..the first thing reached for by Susan Nelsen on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:22:07 PM
A Better Solution? by Roger on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:41:45 PM
Hoisted on your own petard by ardee D. on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 7:12:49 AM