Tags for This Article:

Media (3092)  People (2495)  World (1084)  Chavez Hugo (150) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ;
Add to My Group
November 16, 2007 at 12:32:19

Swiftboat on the Rocks: the failed smearing of Hugo Chavez

by Elizabeth Ferrari     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

By now, the American public knows that Hugo Chavez is a dictator, that he suppresses free speech and that he shoots college students that dare to protest against his regime. We know that the constitutional reforms sponsored by his party are up for a vote on December 2 and we know they will destroy Venezuela.

We know that, don’t we – because our most respected media outlets say so.

The New York Times, the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times have all issued dire predictions about the reforms now being debated in Venezuela. Who can we trust if not our most reliable media outlets -- who did such an outstanding job of informing us, for example, on the immanent threat posed by Iraq?

We can trust them because they have misrepresented the constitutional reforms up for a vote in Venezuela, because they have misrepresented the protests there and because they persist in their misrepresentations even when solid reporting proves them not only wrong, but willfully wrong as the evidence of the inaccuracies of their “reporting” are posted to the net, let alone, admitted in print. In other words, we can trust them to be inaccurate with a great deal of consistency

It is a measure of Mr. Chavez’s success and of his popularity in Venezuela that the corporate press is out, full court press, against him ahead of the December 2 vote. And no surprise to those of us who have been tracking the American destabilization of democracy in Latin America. The obvious misinformation is saddening but not surprising. John Pilger must have a few, terse words for this campaign against the people of Venezuela.

One might go to Axis of Logic, for example, to find a very different account of the “student protests” of last week. It turns the U.S. corporate media reporting on its head – with photos and video and will never be seen on our television broadcasts.

http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/article_25472.shtml

Mr Chavez, on behalf of thinking people in the United States, I want to apologize to you for these attacks on your government. My people are stressed out over this economy and traumatized from all these years of an Executive out of control. Our “president” has been killing and torturing and cutting the budget for social programs and giving his cronies tax cuts when he takes a break from invading innocent nations. Please forgive us if we are a little slow. We are just trying to survive here. When you know that your “leader” is a torturer, it must have an effect on your political involvement.

I wish we had a president that had been elected even once as you have been. I wish, that in this country, college students were allowed to demonstrate freely as they are in Venezuela instead of being caged into Orwellian “free speech” zones. And I wish that, as a nation, we could debate legislation as your government has enabled that debate in Venezuela.

Many of us understand what a threat your government is to the multinationals and to their cronies and to the structures of our government that depend on them. And, we wish you great good luck in that struggle because it is our struggle, too. Here in the United States, we are struggling for jobs, for health care, for privacy, for basic human rights.

This is a terrible time for us, here. And you and the other progressive leaders of Latin America give us hope that the vampires of this world have met their match. Because it takes more than cash and a co-dependent media to destroy the people’s sincere dedication to making life better for the next generation and not to fall for accusations that a child could disprove.

Andale, Senor Presidente. For my sons and for my nieces, for my homeless neighbors here in this wealthy city, for our veterans returning from Iraq to neglect and disregard. Andale.

 

Elizabeth Ferrari is a San Francisco author and activist.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
17 comments

Elizabeth Ferrari is a San Francisco author and activist.
Elizabeth FerrariElizabeth Ferrari is a San Francisco author and activist.

I'm not sure why the Axis of Logic link isn't working but

if you paste it into your browser, it does work.  My apologies for being tech impaired.

 EF

by Elizabeth Ferrari (18 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 72 comments) on Friday, November 16, 2007 at 2:01:26 PM
 


I was born in Los Angeles and raised in Mexico City. I have travelled throughout Latin America, Europe and Arfica. We're all the same.
GuajolotlI was born in Los Angeles and raised in Mexico City. I have travelled throughout Latin America, Europe and Arfica. We're all the same.

What really happened in the demonstrations

Anti-Chavez students went to the demonstration with gas masks. They were ready to attack the pro-Chavez students. they corraled 150 pro-Chavez students in the School of Social Work building, screaming "We've come to lynch you, you deserve to die" They threw Molotov cocktailsand burned part of the building.They also fired guns.  The authorities did nothing to stop them (Its a privately-owned University, financed by the rich). The anti-Chavez students are the children of the rich from private schools, such as the Catholic University and the Central U. They dont have arguments, they are unable to participate in the battle of ideas, so they resort to violence. Its called the class struggle. The following day the pro- Chavez students organized a massive demonstration repudiating the agents provocateurs and the right wing students.

by Guajolotl (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 131 comments) on Friday, November 16, 2007 at 4:38:49 PM
 


Elizabeth Ferrari is a San Francisco author and activist.
Elizabeth FerrariElizabeth Ferrari is a San Francisco author and activist.

And yet the US media outlets are willfully ignoring that

and they are insunuating the either the Chavez government or their supporters are responsible for the violence.

 We have to be very good decoders of propaganda because these reports will only  become more skewed between now and the vote on 12/2.

 These are the same tactics they use here at home, too.  

by Elizabeth Ferrari (18 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 72 comments) on Friday, November 16, 2007 at 4:55:25 PM
 


Live in Australia, work for public service, interested in social justice issues and hate the lies and fraud that are powering the current crises.
brianLive in Australia, work for public service, interested in social justice issues and hate the lies and fraud that are powering the current crises.

Revealing

The media whores attacks on Chavez should tell people a great deal about what freedom of the press really means...it mnenas freedom to dmeonise official enemies. Its interesting how the presses stories follow the official line....it almost looks as if they are taking their marching orders from the State dept.

But they wouldnt , surely...after all, they are a free press?

by brian (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 101 comments) on Friday, November 16, 2007 at 5:43:01 PM
 


Elizabeth Ferrari is a San Francisco author and activist.
Elizabeth FerrariElizabeth Ferrari is a San Francisco author and activist.

Thank you, Brian!

.

by Elizabeth Ferrari (18 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 72 comments) on Friday, November 16, 2007 at 9:44:19 PM
 


Mail carrier who drives the rest of my colleagues nuts with my politics.
ScottMail carrier who drives the rest of my colleagues nuts with my politics.

This hypocrisy makes my head explode

Chavez is a two-bit thug. Jeez, the radical left makes up stuff about President Bush, but when Chavez actually pulls this stuff, the lefties all line up to polish his tool. Reality left this ongoing saga a long time ago.

by Scott (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 477 comments) on Saturday, November 17, 2007 at 12:35:35 AM
 


Elizabeth Ferrari is a San Francisco author and activist.
Elizabeth FerrariElizabeth Ferrari is a San Francisco author and activist.

I know. War is peace.

And we have always been at war with Iran.

by Elizabeth Ferrari (18 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 72 comments) on Saturday, November 17, 2007 at 9:35:00 AM
 


Live in Australia, work for public service, interested in social justice issues and hate the lies and fraud that are powering the current crises.
brianLive in Australia, work for public service, interested in social justice issues and hate the lies and fraud that are powering the current crises.

scott finds it easy to lie

Scot: 'This hypocrisy makes my head explode'

 No, thats the media led brainwashing, well known to edplode innocent  heads. You need some medicine: lets turn your claims around:

 

'Bush is a two-bit thug. Jeez, the radical right makes up stuff about President Chavez, but when Bush actually pulls this stuff, the righties all line up to polish his tool. Reality left this ongoing saga a long time ago.'

 Now i hope this heals that exploded head, which is  a result of too much all american venezuela-hating propaganda.

 

The truth is always very useful to heal muddled heads.

You can lear more abotut chavez at this site:

http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/ 

by brian (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 101 comments) on Saturday, November 17, 2007 at 5:04:53 PM
 


Mail carrier who drives the rest of my colleagues nuts with my politics.
ScottMail carrier who drives the rest of my colleagues nuts with my politics.

I don't need any medicine from you

Chavez yanked a license from a TV station that he didn't like. Has Bush yanked Keith Olbermann off the air? Or Air America?

Chavez had his lackey legislators grant him emergency powers to rule by decree "temporarily". (Yeah, we'll see how "temporary" that will be.)

Private companies and private property are being confiscated in Venezuela and being turned into socialist experiments. Not even Hillary Clinton will go this far...Oops. Forgot about that health care thing.

Yep. The truth is good medicine. And I just gave it. Gotta run. My car needs gas - and I won't be going to Citgo to buy it.

by Scott (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 477 comments) on Saturday, November 17, 2007 at 11:20:28 PM
 


I'm an anti-civilizationist and election boycott advocate in San Diego. For reasons not to vote in faith-based elections with secret vote counts for candidates you cannot hold accountable if they fail to represent you, check out the discussions, articles, and videos on my website http://noinnovember.ning.com
Mark E. SmithI'm an anti-civilizationist and election boycott advocate in San Diego. For reasons not to vote in faith-based elections with secret vote counts for candidates you cannot hold accountable if they fail to represent you, check out the discussions, articles, and videos on my website http://noinnovember.ning.com

Chavez didn't yank their license.

 

The lincense for that TV station had expired, and because they had helped organize the U.S.-backed attempted coup against Chavez, and broadcast false information during the coup, he simply refused to renew their license. In the U.S., if a TV station helped to organize an attempted coup against Bush and broadcast lies about him, they wouldn't merely be subject to not having their license renewed--they'd be labelled terrorists and sent to Guantanamo to be tortured. Dan Rather was forced off 60 Minutes for broadcasting a TRUE story about Bush, one that has also been broadcast by the BBC and has never been refuted. 

As for ruling by decree, what do you think Bush's executive orders are?

When privately-owned land lies fallow while the poor have no land, there is no legal reason a government may not confiscate it. Even homesteads in the U.S. have an "improvement" requirement, without which they are not recognized. The U.S. seizes private property for eminent domain all the time, usually property that belongs to poor people that is then given to wealthy developers. And if you read some of the books by economic hit man John Perkins, you'll learn that many companies acquired rights in foreign countries through violence or bribes, and then violated the laws of those countries so that they could expropriate their natural resources. Taking back what is rightfully yours is not theft.

As for health care, it seems that every country in the world except for the U.S. has a national health care plan, so I suppose that must mean that in your eyes, socialism has taken over the entire world? I don't think so.  ;)

And if you want to pay more for your gas, it is your freedom as an American to do so and nobody will try to stop you. Go right ahead!

 

 

by Mark E. Smith (21 articles, 30 quicklinks, 98 diaries, 1302 comments) on Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 12:25:48 PM
 


Elizabeth Ferrari is a San Francisco author and activist.
Elizabeth FerrariElizabeth Ferrari is a San Francisco author and activist.

You are merely illustrating the disinformation

that has been planted in the American press.

 If CNN colluded to kidnap Bush, how long would they be on the air?

 And private property is not being confiscated in Venezuela.

by Elizabeth Ferrari (18 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 72 comments) on Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 12:40:46 PM
 


DOB -- September 20, 1940. Became active in civil rights and peace movements in 1962. Active in socialist and antiwar movements -- 1963-69. Active in Gay Liberation from 1969 to present.
rhalfhillDOB -- September 20, 1940. Became active in civil rights and peace movements in 1962. Active in socialist and antiwar movements -- 1963-69. Active in Gay Liberation from 1969 to present.

GRAVE CONCERNS ABOUT CHAVEZ -- STALINISM OR SOCIALISM?

   These pro and con posts about Chavez are missing the important point.  Human are most likely to arrive at the closest approximation of the truth if they are able to hear ALL views as defended by sincere adherents of those views.  Then by considering all the arguments for the different views and the documentation for all the factual assertions that have been brought forth, and then considering all this data, people are most likely to reach conclusions that have the greatest probability of being true.  We can't do this if some opinions, if not forbidden outright, are denied access to the media.  And the views must be defended by sincere adherents; having something like a College of Jesuits to tell us about all the "wrong" views and "why they are wrong" won't be an adequate substitute.  Often opponents of an opinion miss the main point of the arguments for opinions they oppose.

   The reasons why we should have freedom of speech and opinions were propounded by John Stuart Mill in the 19th century in his ON LIBERTY.

   I originally had reason to hope that Venezuela was developing actual socialism instead of the dictatorship masquerading as socialism known as Stalinism.  Hugo Chavez faced several elections that it was possible for him to lose.  Yet he won.  So there seemed to be no justification for the U.S. press characterizing him as a dictator, let alone the off the wall comparisons of him to Stalin and Hitler.  I seemed that for the first time the world would be able to see what actual socialism is as opposed to the bad name Stalinism has given it.

   But when Chavez nationalized all the TV stations and I heard nothing about iron clad constitutional guarantees assuring access to the media of opinions other than those of the official Bolivarian Revolution, it seemed like the darkness of censorship was obscuring freedom of speech and opinion in Venezuela and that the Venezuelan Revolution was being bureaucratized in the same way the Russian Revolution was under Stalin.

   The following reports of Chavez overhauling the Constitution made me even more alarmed.  Chavez being voted an unlimited number of terms in office does not alarm me.  It would be foolish to arbitrarialy compel the voters to discharge an elected official who was doing a good job.  And the arguments about how the U.S. media would have been baned if they supported a revolution against Bush needs further clarification.  If the media in Venezuela were advocating the overthrow of Chavez and defending those who were trying to overthrow him, that would be part of their right to freedom of speech and opinion in a free society.  But if they were complicit in illegal acts, such as attempting to kidnap Chavez and impose their views on the majority by violence, then the ban was justified.  However if Venezuela is to remain a free society, there would still have to be guarantees that dissidents can access the mass media.

   I was unable to access the video of the stdent demonstrations, and even if I could, I would still have to exame more than one video to decide who is telling the truth about the students.

Robert Halfhill

by rhalfhill (3 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 283 comments) on Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 10:11:28 PM
 


I'm a 29 year old male. 
TyI'm a 29 year old male. 

Absolute nonsense

Chavez hasn't nationalized the entire media or even most of it. The large majority of the media in Venezuela is owned by private corporations and that includes TV, Radio, and newspapers and they're all against the Bolivarian revolution and are fanatically opposed to Hugo Chavez.

Freedom of speech and freedom of the press does not include advocating violence and advocating the overthrow of the country's legitimate government. Freedom of speech and the press does not give the media the right to deceive the public with deliberate lies, distortions, disinformation, and misinformation. The media has a responsibility to be impartial and provide accurate information. The media has a responsibility to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

 

by Ty (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 809 comments) on Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 11:44:44 PM
 


Mail carrier who drives the rest of my colleagues nuts with my politics.
ScottMail carrier who drives the rest of my colleagues nuts with my politics.

Gotta correct some things

"Dan Rather was forced out after airing a TRUE story about Bush..."

LIE. The documents were forged.  Rather can sue CBS all he wants, but he will only make a total fool of himself.

"If CNN tried overthrow Bush, they would all be sent to Gitmo and be tortured..."

Another lie. They haven't even tried to throw Randi Rhodes or Mike Malloy off the air, and they have  "joked" about assassinations or drowning cabinet officials or beating up pro-Bush bloggers.

I stand by my assessment of Hugo Chavez. When he bellowed about "the smell of sulfur" at the U.N., that was him passing gas.

by Scott (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 477 comments) on Monday, November 19, 2007 at 1:05:45 AM
 


DOB -- September 20, 1940. Became active in civil rights and peace movements in 1962. Active in socialist and antiwar movements -- 1963-69. Active in Gay Liberation from 1969 to present.
rhalfhillDOB -- September 20, 1940. Became active in civil rights and peace movements in 1962. Active in socialist and antiwar movements -- 1963-69. Active in Gay Liberation from 1969 to present.

FORBIDDING MEDIA TO "LIE" LEADS TO STALISM

 


 If we permit any law that says the media's freedom of speech does not include the right to tell deliberate lies and distortions or that they have the responsibility to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth to be on the books, you have opened up an avenue for those with one view to prosecute those with a different view on trumped up charges of telling lies.  For instance, many of us believe the Bush/Cheney administration was complicit in 9/11 and that, in fact, 9/11 was an inside job.  We have even found more than enough evidence to prove it.  But under your concept of freedom of speech, Bush/Chaney would have an immediate opening to prosecute us for "telling lies and deliberate distortions."  On the other hand, it would be equally wrong for us, if we had the power, to prosecute the Bush/Chaney Administration for "telling lies and deliberate distortions."  Let each side be free to defend their views and leave people free to decide after they have heard all the arguments and factual data for themselves,
   Of course, under capitalism, those with great wealth own the media and the media only broadcast or print the views that advance the interest of the members of the ruling class who own the media.  Therefore, the views supporting Bush/Cheney's views about 9/11 get extensive coverage whereas we have to fight to get our views past the media blackout.  The Internet has enabled the 9/11 truth movement to be far more successful than we would have been only one decade ago.
   So capitalism is incompatible with democracy, including freedom of speech and opinion.  But that is no justification for socialists introducing their own restriction on free speech.  That route leads step by step to so called "socialist utopias" like Stalin's Russia where the majority of inhabitants live in fear of the night time knock on the door.
   And freedom of speech does include the right to advocate the overthrow of the government.  In a leaflet I published after Bush stole the 2000 election, I pointed out that the Serbian people took to the streets after Milosevic tried to seize power.  A friend who was helping me print the leaflets was so concerned that he even consulted a lawyer to find out whether it was legal to put out such a leaflet.  The lawyer said it was.
   It is also legal for me to point out that the ruling class will probably resort to something like a military coup or a fascist takeover if a government that really intends to abolish capitalism is elected.  In that situation, it will be the ruling class who will be trying to overthrow the government and the majority will be merely exercising their right and duty to defend the government by any means necessary.  In the present situation in the United States, I am free to advocate these views publicly.  These freedoms are under increasing threat of being violated in the present post 9/11 climate in the United States but that does not alter the fact that that is what real freedom of speech and opinion involves.
   It would be illegal for the media to advocate the murder of a specific person or urge the people to arm themselves and come into the streets when Chavez was threatened with a military coup.
   I had hoped that a true socialist society would develop in Venezuela just as I hoped it would develop in Nicaragua.  I still hope that it will happen in Venezuela but it will happen eventually somewhere.
Robert Halfhill   rhalfhill@juno.com


http://halfhillviews.greatnow.com (SITE NOW BANNED ON AOL)
*Write AOL to complain, here:  aolaccessibility@aol.com, or call 1-888-212-5537.

http://RedLavenderInsurgent.blogspot.com

by rhalfhill (3 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 283 comments) on Monday, November 19, 2007 at 3:25:12 AM
 


Elizabeth Ferrari is a San Francisco author and activist.
Elizabeth FerrariElizabeth Ferrari is a San Francisco author and activist.

The bulk of the media in Venezuela is still in the hands

of the oligarchy.  I think you can relax on this point.

 

 http://www.rethinkvenezuela.com/downloads/RCTV.htm

by Elizabeth Ferrari (18 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 72 comments) on Monday, November 19, 2007 at 1:40:07 PM
 

 

17 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Representatives Were Threatened with "Martial Law" if Bailout Bill Did Not Pass by Patrick Henningsen

Tell Karl, John, Dick, and Sarah in a Letter to the Editor that this Ayers Tactic Just Won't Work! by Stephen Fox

Those Who Call Obama A Muslim Posted by Rob Kall

30 Lies Refuted about Ayers and Obama Posted by John Wilson

Albright, Clarke, 200 Diplomats Laud Obama's Willingness to Talk Directly to Adversaries Without Preconditions Posted by Stephen Fox

Palin Debate Performance Deconstructed by Steven Leser

This is Your Nation on White Privilege Posted by Siv O'Neall

Palin Hates Native Alaskans, Black Folks Too Posted by Hans Bennett

All that's missing are the uniforms! Posted by W. Christopher Epler (Bill)

Meet The $700 Billion Bailout Czar by Rob Kall

Go To Top 50 Most Popular