Tags for This Article:

Republican (2039)  Corporations (884)  Fraud (498)  Lawsuits (455)  Business (164) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
January 15, 2008 at 19:27:18

Headlined on 1/15/08:
The time to charge the Bastille is drawing near.

by Ed Tubbs     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

C’mon, dammit . . . Now this is really pissing me off!

 

Maybe not this month, perhaps not even this year or next, but sooner or later business is going to try to rip you off. The impulse is in the breed, and the proclivity to step beyond all limits is written through history in blood and tears.

 

I have a suggestion, when you encounter someone trying to tell you how the “market,” if left alone, without government interference, is self-correcting. Throw the person against the wall, then slap hell out of them for insulting you, as if you’re so dumb you’ll swallow any line of bull.

 

Yesterday, the Republican Supreme Court of non-activist judges ruled along straight party lines in Stoneridge v. Scientific-Atlanta, 06-43 that corporations can rob you and all investors blind, they can engage securities fraud, and there’s not a damn thing you can do about it.  

 

“Suppas on, en I gotta git to it. Thet about does it doan it Billy Ray?”

 

Last session the Court held they could divine the intent of  “Bong hits for Jesus,” and that employees had no right to sue for disability and employment compensation when the corporation or another court miscounted the days left to appeal rulings. EVERYTHING, as in E-V-E-R-Y-T-H-I-N-G is now unabashedly of the corporations, by the corporations, and for the corporations, and whether it’s you or the environment that takes the hit is just plain tough.

 

After handing down the ruling, the Court put the Enron investors’ suit on their list of cases to consider. If the Supremes either decide to not hear the suit involving $30 billion in investors and retirees lost savings or to hear it and decide along yesterday’s guidelines . . .   I mean, folks who have been seriously wronged by scoundrels . . .  Business and industries associations have been referring to such cases as “frivolous litigation,” and every one of us knows someone who has swallowed that trail of crap, then spewed it out, almost on cue. Friv’lous lawsuits . . . and everything gets reduced to the McDonald’s hot coffee or the lost pants at the dry cleaners level, and still we associate with druids like these; “keepin’ peace in the fambleh yeh know.”

 

The election this year is important. And if any one of us or our kids or grandkids are to have any chance at justice whatsoever, we absolutely must elect a Democrat as president, and we’ve got to make it highly personal to those who like to think of themselves as our friends that this is so much more important than any friendship. If we don’t change things, if the current course of events keeps heading down that same sorry path . . . What’s the alternative available to us? Take to the streets? Storm the Bastille?

 

Personally, I don’t see an alternative, if we can’t change the way things are headed. Do you?

 — Ed Tubbs

 

An "Old Army Vet" and liberal, qua liberal, with a passion for open inquiry in a neverending quest for truth unpoisoned by religious superstitions. Per Voltaire: "He who can lead you to believe an absurdity can lead you to commit an atrocity."

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 comments

Richard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.
Richard MynickRichard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.

Storming the Bastille would be better than electing a Dem.

Look at the Nancy Pelosi Congress. What exactly was gained by "taking back Congress" in 2006?

As a people, Americans have the political equivalent of Stockholm Syndrome. They really seem to enjoy being abused by their masters.

"Storming the Bastille" would demonstrate to the masters that the jig is up -- that there is going to be major change, starting TODAY.

Electing a Dem is a signal that we will accept unlimited abuse; that we continue to be fooled by the masters' good cop/bad cop routine; that we are not demanding change but rather begging for it from our knees; that if they refuse to give us change, we will do nothing more than whimper about it; that we simply don't have the guts or imagination to do anything else.

by Richard Mynick (2 articles, 3 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 1162 comments) on Wednesday, January 16, 2008 at 10:42:16 AM
 


Charlie Levenson is a writer and activist in Portland, Oregon. In addition to serving as the Manager of Electronic Communications for a social/athletic club in Portland, he instructs in Digital Media at Portland State University, consults on communications strategy, and occasionally writes/directs videos.
Charlie LCharlie Levenson is a writer and activist in Portland, Oregon. In addition to serving as the Manager of Electronic Communications for a social/athletic club in Portland, he instructs in Digital Media at Portland State University, consults on communications strategy, and occasionally writes/directs videos.

Two sides of the same coin.

If we elect a Democrat anything like the one that decided in 1996 that allowing major corporations to buy up as many different media outlets as they wanted to and that removal of the limitations on owning more than a limited number of media outlets would be a GOOD thing, then I think we are idiots.  BTW, for those of you who don't remember the 1996 Telecommunications Act, it's was the final nail in the coffin of "free press" and the real SOLIDIFICATION of the right-wing, corporate-dominated, media spin machine that we now call the MSM, and we have BILL CLINTON (the best Republican President we've ever had) to blame for it.

WE MUST DESTROY THE CORPORATE STATE IF WE ARE TO EVER SURVIVE AS A SPECIES.

WE MUST REPEAL THE "PERSONHOOD" OF THE CORPORATION AND RETURN THE HUMAN BEING/CITIZEN TO THE HIGHEST POSITION ON THE FOOD CHAIN OF GOVERNMENT.

Perhaps, WE MUST CHARGE THE BASTILLE.

See you at the barricades.

by Charlie L (2 articles, 3 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 666 comments) on Wednesday, January 16, 2008 at 11:03:12 AM
 

 

7 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Representatives Were Threatened with "Martial Law" if Bailout Bill Did Not Pass by Patrick Henningsen

30 Lies Refuted about Ayers and Obama Posted by John Wilson

Those Who Call Obama A Muslim Posted by Rob Kall

What I Learned At The Sarah Palin Rally Before They Threw Me Out! by Linda Milazzo

This is Your Nation on White Privilege Posted by Siv O'Neall

Albright, Clarke, 200 Diplomats Laud Obama's Willingness to Talk Directly to Adversaries Without Preconditions Posted by Stephen Fox

The End of American Hegemony by Paul Craig Roberts

Palin Debate Performance Deconstructed by Steven Leser

Meet The $700 Billion Bailout Czar by Rob Kall

This Is Our Obama! Posted by Donna Roepenack

Go To Top 50 Most Popular