Tags for This Article:

Presidential Campaign (446)  Constitution The (361)  Presidential Authority (42) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ;
Add to My Group
April 27, 2008 at 07:23:55

A three in three chance for another Bush

by Ed Martin     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com

Tell A Friend

If I had to pinpoint the one thing that has lowered the United States to the status of a third rate dictatorship, it would be the fact that George Bush unconstitutionally and therefore illegally assumed the position of commander in chief. From that position, he assumed the authority to, also unconstitutionally, declare war, with the resultant destruction of Iraq, a million innocent people, over 4000 US soldiers, the US military, the US economy and the rule of law.

All three candidates for the presidency, Clinton, McCain and Obama, are chomping at the bit to become president, so that they can also be commander in chief. They have already done, before they're even elected, exactly what George Bush did, using 9/11 as his excuse to anoint himself to that position. They're thinking that when they become president, they'll automatically become commander in chief, assuming Bush's falsely assumed role.

We now have a three in three chance (100%) of having another George Bush as president.

Look at this.

At a news conference in Chicago on March 12, 2008, "Admirals and generals from the United States Army, Navy and Air Force that together have served under the last nine Commanders-in-Chief today announced their endorsement of Obama for president."

Compounding the falsehood, Obama said, "As a candidate for the presidency, I know that I am running to be Commander-in-Chief."

Obama, Bushlike in his fevered rush to become commander in chief, is ignoring the fact that there have been only six commanders in chief in the history of the United States. They are Madison, Polk, McKinley, Wilson, Roosevelt and Truman, who was the last commander in chief in l945. There has not been a commander in chief since then.

Clinton has already, on her own, without a congressional declaration, declared war on Iran and is contemplating Iran's obliteration. She's already, unelected yet, practicing how to act like a commander in chief, even though she'll never be one, even if she attains the presidency. After Bush has reduced the US military to a pathetic shadow, a mere shell, a burnt out husk of its former self by appointing ideologue Republican sycophants to run it, the congress wouldn't dare declare war on anything.

There's no point in discussing McCain's delusions of becoming commander in chief. After all, he's a conservative, and even worse, a Republican. Enough said.

The constitution provides that the president shall be commander in chief of the military WHEN CALLED INTO SERVICE. Note that the president is commander in chief of only the military, while Bush, Clinton, McCain and Obama are trying to pass themselves off as commander in chief of the whole United States. The only provision in the constitution for calling the military into service is congress' exclusive power to declare war. That was last done in December of 1941.

Whoever becomes president, it a certainty that they will not be commander in chief of anything.

If we had a qualified candidate elected to the presidency, that president on taking office, when asked by the Defense Department how to continue conducting Bush's Iraq war would say:

"Look, I'm not the commander in chief. I have no authority to give orders to the military about what to do with Bush's Iraq war. Its his war, go ask him what he wants to do about it. I'm not involved in it.

"But, I will tell you this. Inasmuch as Bush declared war illegally, it is a war, even though it is an illegal war, and as such is a war crime. I'm instructing the Attorney General to prosecute everyone in the Bush administration, including Bush, everyone in the Pentagon, everyone associated with the Defense Department, every member of Congress who unconstitutionally tried to pass on their war declaring powers to George Bush and continue to provide the money for Bush's war crimes, everyone who advocated for Bush's illegal war, for war crimes and aiding and abetting a war crime.

"So, if you still support Bush's war crimes in any way, you're going to be hearing from the Justice Department."

That's what a qualified president would do. Its what I would do.

 

Ed Martin is an unindicted curmudgeon. He is not a Democrat, Republican, conservative, liberal, deist, atheist, or a member of any -ism.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Spurl      Tag!RawSugar      Shadows Tag!      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments

Editor of Common Sense Political Thought, mostly Republican (but not always), mostly conservative (but again, not always), always interesting.
Dana PicoEditor of Common Sense Political Thought, mostly Republican (but not always), mostly conservative (but again, not always), always interesting.

Way off base

Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution states:

The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States .  .  .  .

That means that the President is always commander-in-chief of the Army and Navy (and, by extension, the Air Force and Marine Corps), and is CinC of the various state militia when those militia are called into the service of the federal government.  While those militia are not in federal service, their commanders-in-chief are the state governors.

This section establishes complete civilian control over all branches of the military; if we were to read the constitution as you do, the commanders-in-chief of the armed forces would be the uniformed chiefs of staff of the four armed services -- the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff does not hold direct military authority -- and we'd have no civilian control of the armed services, save in time of declared war.

by Dana Pico (5 articles, 0 quicklinks, 4 diaries, 135 comments) on Sunday, April 27, 2008 at 2:14:34 PM
 


I am concerned about the intentions of our elected leaders.
Stephen HartI am concerned about the intentions of our elected leaders.

I agree to "Way off Base"

If the action offered were attempted, it would be an invitation for impeachment.

by Stephen Hart (1 articles, 1 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 23 comments) on Sunday, April 27, 2008 at 5:26:33 PM
 


Ed Martin is an unindicted curmudgeon. He is not a Democrat, Republican, conservative, liberal, deist, atheist, or a member of any -ism.
Ed MartinEd Martin is an unindicted curmudgeon. He is not a Democrat, Republican, conservative, liberal, deist, atheist, or a member of any -ism.

Contradiction

Article II, Section 2 sets up the condition for WHEN the president shall be commander in chief.  It clearly states that the WHEN is when the military is called into service.  This requires that the opposite corollary be that the president is not the commander in chief when the military is not called into service.

The Article is a simple, declaratory sentence, consisting of subject, verb and predicate, followed by a conditional prepositional phrase beginning with "when," that acts on and modifies the sentence, setting up the condition.

The "shall be" is a future predicate that is contingent upon the military being called into service, and that "shall be" can only be realized under those conditions.  Article II, Section 2 is conditional, the condition being that the president is commander in chief when, and only under the condition when, the military is called into service.

Thus, it is an obvious contradiction to say that the president is commander in chief when the military is called into service and to say that the president is always commander in chief, unconditionally, when the conditions are clearly stated in the Article.   That does not meet the conditions set forth in the Article.

An example of the conditional future predicate is that I shall be president when hell freezes over.  If you interpret that statement unconditionally, the same way that you interpret that the president is always commander in chief, then I am always president, whether hell freezes over or not.

The educators experienced in the teaching of the English language have found that the Constitution is written to be understood at the 11th grade vocabulary level.  The analysis provided here is an example of that undemanding vocabulary level.  

by Ed Martin (106 articles, 0 quicklinks, 30 diaries, 111 comments) on Sunday, April 27, 2008 at 7:08:40 PM
 

 

3 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

24 hrs 48 hrs
72 hrs 1 week
1 month 6 months
1 year All Time
Articles
Diaries Members
Products Events
Polls  
  

Articles Popularity:

GOP whistleblower names Karl Rove in Ohio's 04 election theft
by steveheller

Epilepsy Study Incriminates Aspartame in Medications
by Dr. GLEN MABSON, Phd. Epileptic Foundation of Maui dba Pacific Epilepsy Society

Bill C51 in Canada is a MAJOR WARNING to all of us. Fascism is coming in through food and health products.
by Linn Cohen-Cole

Dalai Lama: "I Love President Bush... but... Lack(s) Understanding of Reality"
by Rob Kall

You Say You Want a Revolution?
by Olga Bonfiglio

The Greatest Bank Robbery of the Century
by William Helbig

Excuse this interruption of deadly serious matters, to ask what you're packing for the internment camp stay.
by Linn Cohen-Cole

False Flag of Terror
by Kelly Mitchell

McCain to NY Times; Damn It My Friend, Can't You See? I Am Right, Obama's Wrong. Let Me Repeat...
by Rob Kall

Lieberman At Hagee Conference: U.S. Should Attack Iran because God Hates Israel's Enemies
by Gustav Wynn