Tags for This Article:

Bush Admin (1737) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s):
Add to My Group
July 22, 2007 at 10:54:39

Will Hillary be left standing naked in the street?

by Ed Martin     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com

Tell A Friend

In a letter dated July 16, Undersecretary of Defense Eric Edelman responded to Senator Clinton's question about the Pentagon's plans for the eventual withdrawal of US troops from Iraq: 

"Premature and public discussion of the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq reinforces enemy propaganda...such talk understandably unnerves the very same Iraqi allies we are asking to assume enormous personal risks."  "As you know, it is long-standing departmental policy that operational plans, including contingency plans, are not released outside the department."

This is his reply to the person he works for.

The very next day, (coincidence?) July 17, George Bush issued an Executive Order: Blocking Property of Certain Persons who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq.  This executive order can be read to target Hillary, but it also targets the rest of us. 

Quoting the significant phrases of the executive order to get to the meaning of it:

"all property and interests in property of the following persons...are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury,"

"Following persons" is defined as "any United States citizen."  That's you and me.

"to pose a significant risk of committing an act...that have the purpose or effect of:

"undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq..."

"the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order."

What all this means is that George Bush can order his Secretary of the Treasury to "determine," without any evidence, that we "pose a significant risk" of "undermining political reform in Iraq."  We don't have to actually do any thing.  Just pose a risk.  As the Undersecratary of Defense told Hillary, that can be just about anything the Great Decider decides it is.  "Significant risk" is Bush's excuse for pre-emptive war against the people of the United States.  We can be found guilty of being a significant risk by merely asking how the war's going, advocating that the troops be withdrawn and that the war be ended, or questioning whether Bush should have started the war.  According to George Bush everyone who writes for OpEdNews advocating any of the above is guilty.  Without any due process of law and without prior notice we can have all our property, all our bank accounts confiscated, our interest in our residence, house or apartment, owned or rented, blocked and be left standing naked on the street.

The insidious part of the executive order is that after we're left with nothing, anyone who offers to provide us food, shelter and clothing is also guilty and can be subjected to the same treatment, and left standing beside us, naked on the street.

Well, I'm guilty as hell of violating Bush's executive order, and proud of it.  About seventy percent of the population is guilty, too.  In order to assure that I'm as much in violation as I can be, I'll say this:

George, I'm calling your bluff.  You've plowed up a snake, here.  Your executive order is in violation of the Constitution, my sense of integrity and what's just and honorable.  It attempts to end my constitutional right to free speech, so I'll just use my free speech on my own authority.  Your executive order treats the people of the United States the same way Hitler treated the Jews in Germany.  We saw what happened to them, but I'll be damned if I'll let you do it to me.  If you keep trying to pull these bone-headed stunts, you're going to have a situation to deal with here in the US that's much worse than your Operation Iraqi F--kup.  You're going to have people who stand up and fight back, on our own.  You may have the Democratic congress fooled, but you can't fool me.  You can't frighten me.  Nothing a pip-squeak like you can do frightens me.  The only thing I want to happen in Iraq is that we get our troops our, right now.  I couldn't care less what happens in Iraq after that.  After all, you said that you've brought democracy to Iraq.  So, according to you, it's entirely up to them.

I defy you to try to take anything I own.  Don't make the mistake of even trying to.  As you put it so eloquently, "Bring 'em on."  I'll be waiting and watching for you.

 

Ed Martin is an unindicted curmudgeon. He is not a Democrat, Republican, conservative, liberal, deist, atheist, or a member of any -ism.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Spurl      Tag!RawSugar      Shadows Tag!      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments

I am a retired civil servant. I was an electronics technician.
BarkerI am a retired civil servant. I was an electronics technician.

stand up for our rights

We certainly need to stand up for our rights.  I believe the president craves power - as well as Senator Clinton herself.  I doubt Her Royal Highness Hillary's truthfulness - how many of us forgotten as recently as last year she was more pro-war than the president?

I foresee Senator Clinton leading the charge - until her past comes back to haunt her.  There will be others to follow - I see this as her downfall, not the Democrats.  She will be replaced.

What I find frightening is the public's tacit approval of the president.  If we were really committed to change there would be no SUVs (remember the directions to Camp Casey?  carpool using electric/hybrids, no SUVs?), no overweight Americans (food is a weapon, we condone torture - how many Africans have to starve so Michael Sicko Moore can overeat?).  Solar heating would be the norm not the exception.  And of course, Wal-Mart should have been bankrupt at least ten years ago (how many workers have to slave for 72 hour shifts at two cents an hour?). 

I agree with Ed Martin - we will rise up for our rights and the Republican Party will be destroyed.

 

 

by Barker (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 109 comments) on Sunday, July 22, 2007 at 5:04:44 PM
 

 

1 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

 

 

 

 

24 hrs 48 hrs
72 hrs 1 week
1 month 6 months
1 year All Time
Articles
Diaries Members
Products Events
Polls  
  

Articles Popularity:

GOP whistleblower names Karl Rove in Ohio's 04 election theft
by steveheller

Epilepsy Study Incriminates Aspartame in Medications
by Dr. GLEN MABSON, Phd. Epileptic Foundation of Maui dba Pacific Epilepsy Society

Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Workers vs Exxon
by Merle Savage

Fox-Owned National Geographic Uses Gorillas as Cover for Exploitation of Congo
by Georgianne Nienaber

The "Ownership Society"
by Mike Malloy

The Great Depression of 2008
by Marc McDonald

Dalai Lama: "I Love President Bush... but... Lack(s) Understanding of Reality"
by Rob Kall

Federal Judge Ruling: George W. Bush is a Felon
by Len Hart

Nine Republicans Break Party Ranks: Send Impeachment Article to Judiciary for Hearings
by Ralph Lopez

Australia Only Nation Comprehending Beijing Smog Medical Damage; Skipping Opening Ceremony August 8!
by Stephen Fox