Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
November 14, 2006 at 19:08:26

View Ratings | Rate It

The 2006 Elections: Fraud? No Fraud?

FACEBOOK
submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Diane Perlman (about the author)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Diane Perlman - Writer

Because the Democrats took the House and Senate, people ignore the fraud in the 2006 elections. On Bill Maher's Real Time on November 10, actor Rainn WIlson inferred that there was no fraud, saying that if the Democrats lost they'd be out in the streets, implying that there was no fraud and they would be sore losers, and the Republicans aren't protesting.

This simplistic, two-dimensional thinking ignores the fact that there was a lot of fraud: that the margins were larger than the actual numbers indicated, that the Democrats probably lost some races in which more people voted for them. There are people, like Donna Edwards of Maryland, who should probably be in the new congress. This was probably the reason why some Republicans and Rove were overconfident about results. I also believe that George Allen and Conrad Burns did not push for a recount of the "close" Virginia and Montana races because scrutiny might reveal the fraud. They probably came very close to stealing the election and the Senate. Because of the overall results, there may be a sense of complacency that may reduce efforts to correct problems for the 2008 elections. Someone, (I can't remember who and would prefer to quote) recently said that we have to be ahead by a landslide in order to squeak by. I hope these races are challenged and corrected.

I think this is a very big deal. I think it would be good if someone could list all the close races that were probably stolen, like with final vote count, estimate of stolen votes and how (Palast & others, and the data called in) and the difference in make up of the final congress, including numbers of women, people of color, etc, to concretize the hypothesis.

 

Diane Perlman is a clinical and political psychologist, devoted to applying knowledge from psychology, conflict studies and social sciences to designing strategies and policies to reverse nuclear proliferation, to drastically reduce terrorism, and (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments

 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2010, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum